Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.05.27.445943

Differences in nanoscale organization of DNase I hypersensitive and insensitive chromatin in single human cells

Abstract

Methodological advances in conformation capture techniques have fundamentally changed our understanding of chromatin architecture. However, the nanoscale organization of chromatin and its cell-to-cell variance are less studied. By using a combination of high throughput super-resolution microscopy and coarse-grained modelling we investigated properties of active and inactive chromatin in interphase nuclei. Using DNase I hypersensitivity as a criterion, we have selected prototypic active and inactive regions from ENCODE data that are representative for K-562 and more than 150 other cell types. By using oligoFISH and automated STED microscopy we systematically measured physical distances of the endpoints of 5kb DNA segments in these regions. These measurements result in high-resolution distance distributions which are right-tailed and range from very compact to almost elongated configurations of more than 200 nm length for both the active and inactive regions. Coarse-grained modeling of the respective DNA segments suggests that in regions with high DNase I hypersensitivity cell-to-cell differences in nucleosome occupancy determine the histogram shape. Simulations of the inactive region cannot sufficiently describe the compaction measured by microscopy, although internucleosomal interactions were elevated and the linker histone H1 was included in the model. These findings hint at further organizational mechanisms while the microscopy-based distance distribution indicates high cell-to-cell differences also in inactive chromatin regions. The analysis of the distance distributions suggests that direct enhancer-promoter contacts, which most models of enhancer action assume, happen for proximal regulatory elements in a probabilistic manner due to chromatin flexibility.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Brandstetter, K., Zuelske, T., Ragoczy, T., Hoerl, D., Haugen, E., Rynes, E., Stamatoyannopoulos, J. A., Leonhardt, H., Wedemann, G., Harz, H.. 2021-05-27. Differences in nanoscale organization of DNase I hypersensitive and insensitive chromatin in single human cells. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.27.445943

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Functional characterization of Rho GTPase activating proteins SYDE1 and SYDE2

The human genome encodes more than 60 proteins containing Rho GTPase activating protein (RhoGAP) domains, many of which remain understudied with respect to their target specificity and biological roles. SYDE1 and SYDE2 are two such orphan RhoGAPs, for which there are few studies characterizing their biochemical and cellular functions and conflicting reports identifying their cognate GTPases. We previously identified SYDE1 and SYDE2 in a screen for substrates of the c-Jun N-terminal kinases. Here, we show that SYDE1 and SYDE2 are preferentially phosphorylated by JNK1 relative to other mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) at sites proximal to a kinase docking region. Purified SYDE1 and SYDE2 are shown to have significant catalytic GAP activity toward RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42. However, neither up- nor down-regulation of SYDE1/2 expression leads to detectable changes in bulk GTP loading of any of these GTPases. Nevertheless, we demonstrate that SYDE1 and SYDE2, in a partially GAP-dependent manner, increase cell spreading and number of focal adhesions, and promote more directionally persistent migration in HEK293 cells. Together, these findings establish SYDE1 and SYDE2 as robust JNK substrates with catalytic activity toward a set of Rho GTPases and reveal basic functions of SYDE1 and SYDE2 in regulating cell morphology, adhesion, and migration.

cell biology↗

The filopodial scaffold polyphosphate dictates cell adhesion-versus-invasion decisions

Inorganic polyphosphate (polyP) is an ancient polymer conserved across all life, serving cell type and location specific functions in every major compartment. Yet its role at the plasma membrane, where it accumulates to peak levels in many primary cells, is largely unknown. Here we identify polyP as a stabilizing component of filopodia, actin based membrane protrusions that govern cell adhesion, contact inhibition, and chemotaxis. Elevating cellular polyP increases filopodial stability and enhances cell adhesion, whereas reducing polyP accelerates filopodial disassembly and promotes cell migration. Mechanistically, we find that polyP acts as a structural filopodial scaffold, recruiting and organizing IRSp53, a membrane curvature inducing protein. We show that metastatic fibroblasts and breast cancer organoids carry markedly reduced and intracellularly reorganized polyP levels relative to their non transformed counterparts. Restoring endogenous polyP via lipid nanoparticle delivery suppresses their invasive phenotypes and reverses prometastatic gene expression signatures, implicating polyP as a primordial tumor suppressor.

cell biology↗

Mitochondrial transfer mediates metabolic communication between beta cells and islet macrophages

Pancreatic islet macrophages support islet homeostasis and adapt their metabolic program in response to environmental cues, including beta cell released factors. Intercellular mitochondrial transfer is a biological process that modulates cellular responses. To test whether beta cells, which are strongly secretory, transfer mitochondria to islet macrophages, we generated mice with beta cell-specific expression of mitochondrial GFP (PhAMfloxIns1Cre). We demonstrate that beta cells transfer mitochondria to islet macrophages in vivo and in vitro. Diabetogenic stressors did not alter the frequency of mitochondrial transfer and macrophages containing beta cell-derived GFP exhibit increased protein synthesis rates. RNA-seq identified upregulation of activity-regulated cytoskeleton associated protein (Arc) in macrophages receiving beta cell-derived mitochondria, while disruption of actin cytoskeleton dynamics prevented mitochondrial transfer. Together, these findings identify mitochondrial transfer as a previously unrecognized mechanism of beta cell-macrophage communication that may contribute to islet homeostasis and immune regulation.

cell biology↗