Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.05.05.441737

Cross-fitted instrument: a blueprint for one-sample Mendelian Randomization

Abstract

Bias from weak instruments may undermine the ability to estimate causal effects in instrumental variable regression (IVR). We present here a simple solution for handling weak instrument bias by introducing a new type of instrumental variable called cross-fitted instrument (CFI). CFI splits the data at random and estimates the impact of the instrument on the exposure in each partition. The estimates are then used to perform an IVR on each partition. We adapt CFI to Mendelian randomization (MR) and term this adaptation Cross-Fitting for Mendelian Randomization (CFMR). A major advantage of CFMR is its use of all the available data to select genetic instruments, as opposed to traditional two-sample MR where a large part of the data is only used for instrument selection. Consequently, CFMR has the potential to enhance the power of MR in a meta-analysis setting by enabling an unbiased one-sample MR to be performed in each cohort prior to meta-analyzing the results across all the cohorts. In a similar fashion, CFMR enables a cross-ethnic MR analysis by accounting for ethnic heterogeneity, which is particularly important in consortia-led meta-analyses where the participating cohorts might be of different ethnicities. To our knowledge, there are currently no MR approach that can account for such heterogeneity. Finally, CFMR enables the application of MR to exposures that are rare or difficult to measure, which would normally preclude their analysis in the regular two-sample MR setting. Key messagesO_LIWe develop a new method to enable an unbiased one-sample Mendelian Randomization. C_LIO_LIThe new method provides the same power as the standard two-sample Mendelian Randomization approach and does not require summary statistics from a genome-wide association study in an independent cohort. C_LIO_LIOur approach enables a cross-ethnic instrumental variable regression to account for heterogeneity in a sample consisting of multiple ethnicities. C_LI

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Denault, W. R. P., Bohlin, J., Page, C. M., Burgess, S., Jugessur, A.. 2021-05-05. Cross-fitted instrument: a blueprint for one-sample Mendelian Randomization. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.05.441737

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Comparative functional genomics reveals distributed SERPINE1 like characteristics among Drosophila serpins

Serpins (serine protease inhibitors) regulate proteolytic activity through a suicide-substrate inhibitory mechanism, whereby the serpin covalently traps and inactivates their target protease. Serpins are broadly conserved across eukaryotes, but the evolutionary and functional relationships between human SERPINE1, and Drosophila Serpins in incompletely defined. To identify candidate Drosophila functional analogs of SERPINE1/PAI-1, a multi-omics framework was applied to thoroughly compare the serpins across species. The multi-level analysis integrated orthology prediction, protein sequence and structural characterization, phylogenetic reconstruction, bulk tissue transcriptomics, single-cell transcriptomics, and aging-associated expression analysis. Candidate serpins (Spn42Da, Spn42Db, Spn42Dc, Spn42Dd, Spn28B, and Spn28F) were evaluated using DIOPT, AlphaFold/ChimeraX structural comparisons, reactive center loop analyses, phylogenetic distances, GTEx, Human Protein Atlas, FlyAtlas2, Fly Cell Atlas, and Aging Fly Cell Atlas datasets. Comparative analyses demonstrated full-length sequence and reactive center loop (RCL) divergence despite preservation of the canonical serpin fold. Tissue, cell-type, and age-associated expression analysis revealed distinct candidate-specific patterns. Spn42Dd comparisons uncovered similarities to human SERPINE1 in sequence/structural and broad expression but did not represent the strongest overall cross-species expression correlations. Spn42Da and Spn42Db received the highest cross species integrated support. Quality check of the ranking confirmed that Spn42Da and Spn42Db were stable top candidates across orthology, sequence alignment, and expression domains. The multi-domain analysis was unable to identify a single definitive Drosophila serpin as the closest counterpart to human SERPINE1, indicating that cross-species similarity is distributed across multiple candidate serpins. This study therefore provides a quantitative method for prioritizing potential evolutionary and functional analogs across highly divergent species.

bioinformatics↗

CellChat Hotspot: A Targeted Approach to Cell Cell Communication Analysis With Spatial transcriptomics Validation.

Abstract. In recent years, single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA seq) has enabled the investigation of intercellular communication through Cell Cell Communication (CCC) tools such as CellChat. Despite their potential, these approaches remain challenging to interpret, particularly when global analyses generate complex interaction networks that may include biologically irrelevant signals. To address this limitation, we developed a framework termed CellChat Hotspot, designed to improve the biological interpretability of inferred communication networks. This approach integrates gene set enrichment analysis with a context driven filtering strategy, selecting both genes and cells based on their functional relevance prior to communication inference. Applied to stage II colon cancer data, CellChat Hotspot enabled the identification of condition-specific interaction patterns associated with recurrence. Non recurrent patients showed enrichment of immune related processes, whereas recurrent cases were characterized by pathways associated with invasion and metastasis. Notably, a loss of interaction in the HSPG pathway between CALB1+ and stromal cells was observed in recurrent patients, suggesting a potential disruption of cell matrix adhesion mechanisms. To verify the reliability of this finding, we applied the framework to spatial transcriptomics data, which confirmed the presence of the HSPG2 DAG1 interaction in non-recurrent tumors and its near absence in recurrent ones. Overall, this framework provides a biologically guided strategy for studying intercellular communication in complex systems such as the tumor microenvironment.

bioinformatics↗

DiffTernary: a Diffusion Model for Molecular Glue Ternary Complex Docking

Molecular glues (MGs) modulate protein function by inducing or stabilizing protein interactions. However, accurately modeling MG ternary complexes remains challenging. Here, we present DiffTernary, a diffusion-based docking method for the joint prediction of relative protein arrangement and MG binding pose. We introduce Ternary-PDB, a dataset of 76,702 experimentally determined ternary complexes curated from the Protein Data Bank using structural filters and a release cutoff aligned with AlphaFold 3 (AF3). When trained on this dataset, DiffTernary achieved acceptable protein-protein interaction (PPI) predictions (DockQ > 0.23) for 50.0% of MGBench complexes with a single prediction, compared with 51.1% for AF3. In comparisons with AF3, OpenFold3, ESMFold2, Protenix-v1 and Protenix-v2, DiffTernary ranked second with a best-of-25 PPI prediction success rate of 78.4%, behind ESMFold2 (90.9%) and ahead of AF3 (72.7%). A separate DiffTernary model trained on TernaryDB achieved a mean DockQ of 0.306 on the 94 complexes in the TernaryDB MGD test set with a single prediction, compared with 0.228 for DeepTernary. Confidence-based selection among 40 samples yielded acceptable PPI predictions for 41.5% of complexes, compared with 30.9% for DeepTernary. An E2Former variant increased training and sampling throughput 6.90-fold and 4.37-fold, respectively, under the evaluated configurations. Together, DiffTernary and Ternary-PDB provide an efficient docking approach for MG complex prediction and a valuable structural resource for MG discovery and design.

bioinformatics↗