bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.05.04.442412
The Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator (ASySD): a rapid, open-source, interoperable tool to remove duplicate citations in biomedical systematic reviews.
Abstract
BackgroundResearchers who perform systematic searches across multiple databases often identify duplicate publications. Identifying such duplicates ("deduplication") can be extremely time-consuming, but failure to remove these citations can, in the worst instance, lead to the wrongful inclusion of duplicate data. Many existing tools are not sensitive enough, lack interoperability with other tools, are not freely accessible, or are difficult to use without programming knowledge. Here, we report the performance of our Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator (ASySD), a novel tool to perform automated deduplication of systematic searches for biomedical reviews. MethodsWe evaluated ASySDs performance on 5 unseen biomedical systematic search datasets of various sizes (1,845 - 79,880 citations), which had been deduplicated by human reviewers. We compared the performance of ASySD with Endnotes automated deduplication option and with the Systematic Review Accelerator Deduplication Module (SRA-DM). ResultsASySD identified more duplicates than either SRA-DM or Endnote, with a sensitivity in different datasets of 0.95 to 0.99. The false-positive rate was comparable to human performance, with a specificity of 0.94-0.99. The tool took less than 1 hour to deduplicate all datasets. ConclusionsFor duplicate removal in biomedical systematic reviews, ASySD is a highly sensitive, reliable, and time-saving tool. It is open source and freely available online as both an R package and a user-friendly web application.
Source connections
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Hair, K., Bahor, Z., Liao, J., Macleod, M. R., Sena, E. S.. 2021-05-04. The Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator (ASySD): a rapid, open-source, interoperable tool to remove duplicate citations in biomedical systematic reviews.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.04.442412
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.