bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.04.01.438033
Evaluation of efficacy- versus affinity-driven agonism with biased GLP-1R ligands P5 and exendin-F1
Abstract
The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) is an important regulator of glucose homeostasis and has been successfully targeted for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Recently described biased GLP-1R agonists with selective reductions in {beta}-arrestin versus G protein coupling show improved metabolic actions in vivo. However, two prototypical G protein-favouring GLP-1R agonists, P5 and exendin-F1, are reported to show divergent effects on insulin secretion. In this study we aimed to resolve this discrepancy by performing a side-by-side characterisation of these two ligands across a variety of in vitro and in vivo assays. Exendin-F1 showed reduced acute efficacy versus P5 for several readouts, including recruitment of mini-G proteins, G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and {beta}-arrestin-2. Maximal responses were also lower for both GLP-1R internalisation and the presence of active GLP-1R-mini-Gs complexes in early endosomes with exendin-F1 treatment. In contrast, prolonged insulin secretion in vitro and sustained anti-hyperglycaemic efficacy in mice were both greater with exendin-F1 than with P5. We conclude that the particularly low acute efficacy of exendin-F1 and associated reductions in GLP-1R downregulation appear to be more important than preservation of endosomal signalling to allow sustained insulin secretion responses. This has implications for the ongoing development of affinity- versus efficacy-driven biased GLP-1R agonists as treatments for metabolic disease.
Source connections
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Marzook, A., Chen, S., Pickford, P., Lucey, M., Wang, Y., Correa, I. R., Broichhagen, J., Hodson, D., Salem, V., Rutter, G. A., Tan, T. M., Bloom, S. R., Tomas, A., Jones, B.. 2021-04-02. Evaluation of efficacy- versus affinity-driven agonism with biased GLP-1R ligands P5 and exendin-F1. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.01.438033
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.