Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.03.06.434204

Cross-modal perceptual enhancement of unisensory targets is uni-directional and does not affect temporal expectations

Abstract

Previous studies demonstrated that redundant target stimuli can enhance performance due to multisensory interplay and interactively facilitate performance enhancements due to temporal expectations (TE; faster and accurate reactions to temporally expected targets). Here we tested whether other types of multisensory interactions - i.e. interactions evoked by temporally flanking irrelevant stimuli - can result in similar performance patterns and boost not only unisensory target perception (multi-vs. unisensory sequences) but also unisensory temporal expectations (expected vs. unexpected). To test our hypothesis, we presented sequences of 12 stimuli (10 Hz) which either consisted of auditory (A), visual (V) or alternating auditory-visual stimuli (e.g. A-V-A-V-...) with either auditory (AV(A)) or visual (AV(V)) targets. Participants had to discriminate target frequency which was unpredictable by temporal regularities (expected vs. unexpected target positions) and by stimulation sequence (A, V, AV(A), AV(V)). Moreover, we ran two experiments in which we presented redundant multisensory targets and manipulated the speed of the stimulation sequence (10 vs. 15 Hz stimulus trains) to control whether the results of Experiment 1 depended on sequence speed. Performance for unisensory targets was affected by temporally flanking distractors, with multisensory interactions selectively improving unisensory visual target perception. Yet, only redundant multisensory targets reliably affected TEs. Together, these results indicate that cross-modal facilitation of unisensory target perception in fast stimulus streams is uni-directional, but also differs from multisensory interactions evoked by redundant targets; more specifically, it appears to be context-dependent (task, design etc.) whether unisensory stimulation (unlike redundant target stimulation) allows for the generation of temporal expectations.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ball, F., Nentwich, A., Noesselt, T.. 2021-03-08. Cross-modal perceptual enhancement of unisensory targets is uni-directional and does not affect temporal expectations. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.06.434204

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

A Mechanistic Account of Dedifferentiation in the Aging Visual System

To uncover the mechanisms of age-related dedifferentiation, we simulated neural degradation in a computational model of the ventral visual stream. Severing connections or adding noise, whether in inferotemporal cortex (IT) or upstream, reduced IT differentiation, indicating that dedifferentiation need not originate locally. Degrading peripheral V1, which preferentially drove place-selective IT neurons, selectively reduced place differentiation, a candidate mechanism for the stronger place dedifferentiation reported in aging.

neuroscience↗

Reusing pipettes in Patch-seq: a foundation for automated multimodal profiling

Patch-seq is a technique for single-cell multimodal characterization. It combines whole-cell electrophysiology, single-cell transcriptomics, and morphological reconstruction in single neurons. Patch-seq morphologies are a critical bridge among cell types, genes, physiology, and large-scale connectivity platforms such as EM connectomes and single-cell-resolution projectomes. However, patch-seq experimental complexity and operator dependence limit throughput. Automation could enable scalable Patch-seq but requires procedural adaptations, including detergent-based pipette cleaning, robotic nucleus extraction and collection. The impact of these automations on Patch-seq quality has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we show that each of these modifications preserves or improves key Patch-seq outcomes. Automated nucleus extraction performs comparably to, or better than, expert manual operation, preserving key RNA and morphological metrics. Detergent-cleaned, reused pipettes supported a viable sealing success rate across multiple cleaning cycles and preserved electrophysiological quality and transcriptomic yield without introducing excess contamination. Sonication effectively allows collection of nuclear material without damaging RNA and supports subsequent pipette cleaning and reuse. Enhanced automated sealing and break-in procedures increased throughput regardless of brain region, cell type or species. Together, these results validate the core procedural adaptations required for automated Patch-seq and establish a foundation for high-throughput, standardized multimodal single-cell characterization.

neuroscience↗

Development of direction selectivity in the Xenopus tadpole optic tectum and midbrain tegmentum

Detecting motion direction is a fundamental function performed by direction selective (DS) neurons. DS neurons in the optic tectum (superior colliculus in mammals) enable the tracking of moving objects. DS neurons of the accessory optic system support reflexive eye / head movements that stabilize gaze during self-motion. By developmental stage 48 (10 days postfertilization), Xenopus tadpoles display visually guided behaviors that require both types of DS neurons. Our previous work has shown that these two regions are not only functionally distinct but also follow different developmental programs. Here we characterized and compared how direction selectivity develops in both visual processing centers. Using in vivo electrophysiological recordings during moving bar visual stimulation, we measured DS synaptic inputs and spiking outputs in both regions across three key developmental stages of the retinotectal projection. Tegmental neurons were direction selective ab initio, and both input and output tuning remained stable across development. Tectal neurons were observed to receive DS inputs early, and their input selectivity also remained stable across development. However, their spiking output grew substantially more DS at the later developmental stage. This was due at least in part to a naturally occurring decrease in intrinsic excitability which preferentially dampened overall spike rates, but especially in response to the non-preferred direction of motion, thereby increasing direction selectivity. These results reveal distinct developmental trajectories in parallel visual pathways. Tegmental direction selectivity is established early and stays stable, whereas tectal output tuning sharpens during development through a decrease in intrinsic excitability.

neuroscience↗