Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2021.01.28.428707

Predicting cross-tissue hormone-gene relations usingbalanced word embeddings

Abstract

MotivationLarge volumes of biomedical literature present an opportunity to build whole-body human models comprising both within-tissue and across-tissue interactions among genes. Current studies have mostly focused on identifying within-tissue or tissue-agnostic associations, with a heavy emphasis on associations among disease, genes and drugs. Literature mining studies that extract relations pertaining to inter-tissue communication, such as between genes and hormones, are solely missing. ResultsWe present here a first study to identify from literature the genes involved in inter-tissue signaling via a hormone in the human body. Our models BioEmbedS and BioEmbedS-TS respectively predict if a hormone-gene pair is associated or not, and whether an associated gene is involved in the hormones production or response. Our models are classifiers trained on word embeddings that we had carefully balanced across different strata of the training data such as across production vs. response genes of a hormone (or) well-studied vs. poorly-represented hormones in the literature. Model training and evaluation are enabled by a unified dataset called HGv1 of ground-truth associations between genes and known endocrine hormones that we had compiled. Our models not only recapitulate known gene mediators of tissue-tissue signaling (e.g., at average 70.4% accuracy for BioEmbedS), but also predicts novel genes involved in inter-tissue communication in humans. Furthermore, the species-agnostic nature of our ground-truth HGv1 data and our predictive modeling approach, demonstrated concretely using human data and generalized to mouse, hold much promise for future work on elucidating inter-tissue signaling in other multi-cellular organisms. AvailabilityProposed HGv1 dataset along with our models predictions, and the associated code to reproduce this work are available respectively at https://cross-tissue-signaling.herokuapp.com/, and https://github.com/BIRDSgroup/BioEmbedS. Contactnmanik@cse.iitm.ac.in

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jadhav, A., Kumar, T., Raghavendra, M., Loganathan, T., Narayanan, M.. 2021-01-30. Predicting cross-tissue hormone-gene relations usingbalanced word embeddings. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.28.428707

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Accelerating discovery and integration from RNA to Protein with R2T2P

Integrating transcriptomics and proteomics data remains an unmet challenge in the post-genomics era, discouraging researchers from pursuing integrative approaches to molecular biology research. Leveraging the power of translation profiling, we present RNA to Translation to Protein (R2T2P), a computational platform integrating genome-guided transcriptome assembly with identification of translation and proteins, including a tailored differential analysis framework and support for multiple reference transcriptomes. We applied R2T2P to investigate a cellular model of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), where ectopic expression of the DUX4 retrogene in skeletal muscle triggers significant alterations in transcription and RNA metabolism. We uncovered hundreds of uncharacterized, highly overexpressed RNAs, including antisense and alternative transcripts, and quantified their contribution to translatome and proteome. Re-analysis of expression datasets from patient-derived myotubes and muscle biopsies validated this alternative transcriptome in FSHD patients, adding a reservoir of bona-fide novel molecular actors in a rare disease. Available at https://github.com/nfdata-omics/R2T2P/, R2T2P is a flexible and powerful workflow in modern integrative biology.

bioinformatics↗

MorphoANOVA: Dissecting Histology-Gene Expression Relationships in Spatial Transcriptomics

Spatial transcriptomics (ST) measures the expression of hundreds to thousands of genes within tissue architecture, often accompanied by histology images. However, it remains challenging to systematically characterize which genes exhibit associations with tissue morphology, whether these associations vary spatially, and which genes show additional spatial expression patterns beyond those captured by morphology. Here we introduce MorphoANOVA, a gene-wise statistical framework for characterizing morphology--expression relationships across genes measured by ST. Using nested spatially varying coefficient models and sequential ANOVA, MorphoANOVA assesses slide-wide associations with an H\&E-derived morphology feature, location-specific changes in these associations, and additional spatial variation after accounting for the selected feature. The resulting statistics enable gene prioritization and pathway enrichment analysis, while spatial component maps support the interpretation of individual genes. Simulations demonstrate MorphoANOVA's ability to distinguish the modeled components and recover their spatial patterns. Applications to human cortex and breast cancer identify biological programs associated with different morphology--expression patterns and reveal distinct relationships with cell composition. Across three HER2-positive breast cancer patients, invasive-cancer marker genes consistently exhibit stronger evidence of location-specific morphology associations. MorphoANOVA thus provides a framework for systematically interpreting spatial gene-expression patterns in relation to tissue morphology.

bioinformatics↗

Evaluation effects can rival reported concordance gains in cross-cancer survival prediction

Studies of cross-cancer learning for survival prediction from tumour omics have reported concordance gains of 0.020 and 0.045, but how such gains compare with evaluation effects remains unclear. We examined these effects across 13 TCGA cancers (5,761 patients, 1,526 disease-specific deaths), using five repeats of five-fold cross-validation and paired bootstrap intervals. When model selection did not use test data, our borrowing model gained 0.009 (95% interval 0.001 to 0.016) over its target-fitted reference when cancers received equal weight (post hoc). Random-effects pooling gave a gain of 0.002 (-0.002 to 0.006), with most weight assigned to cancers where the model made little use of the pretrained score. Choosing the fusion weight on test splits raised the apparent equal-weight gain to 0.017. We reimplemented a published method, VAECox, which showed no pretraining gain over random initialisation at the last or validation-selected training step. Choosing each network's best test step, as the published code does, raised concordance by 0.03 to 0.05 across the 13-cancer and ten-cancer overall-survival settings, but barely changed the difference between networks. In a constructed post hoc experiment, choosing the best test step only for the pretrained network changed the equal-weight mean difference from -0.004 to +0.045 (+0.035 to +0.054). Across seven multi-omics comparisons, estimates from single five-fold runs differed from their cancer's five-run mean by at least 0.02 in 11% to 42% of runs. Concordance was about 0.02 lower at held-out tissue source sites. Interpreting a reported gain therefore requires each model's selection rule, variation across repeated partitions, the weighting of cancers and the evaluation population.

bioinformatics↗