Performance of a scalable extraction-free RNA-seq method

Abstract

RNA sequencing enables high-contents/high-complexity measurements in small molecule screens performed on biological samples. Whereas the costs of DNA sequencing and the complexity of RNA-seq library preparation and analysis have decreased consistently, RNA extraction remains a significant bottleneck for RNA-seq of hundreds of samples in parallel. Direct use of cell lysate for RNA-seq library prep is common in single cell RNA-seq but not in bulk RNA-seq protocols. Recently published protocols suggest that direct lysis is compatible with simplified RNA-seq library prep. Here, we evaluate the performance of a bulk RNA-seq library prep protocol optimized for analysis of many samples of adherent cultured cells in parallel. We combine a low-cost direct lysis buffer compatible with cDNA synthesis ("in-lysate cDNA synthesis") with Smart-3SEQ and examine the effects of calmidazolium and fludrocortisone-induced perturbation of primary human dermal fibroblasts. We compared this method to normalized purified RNA inputs from matching samples followed by Smart-3SEQ or Illumina TruSeq library prep. Our results show that whereas variable RNA inputs for each sample in the in-lysate cDNA synthesis protocol result in variable sequencing depth, this had minimal effect on data quality, measurement of gene expression patterns, or generation of differentially expressed gene lists. We found that in-lysate cDNA synthesis combined with Smart-3SEQ RNA-seq library prep allows generation of high-quality data when compared to library prep with extracted RNA, or when compared to Illumina TruSeq. Our data show that small molecule screens using RNA-seq are feasible at low reagent and time costs.