Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2020.11.30.403774

Dynamic modelling of the PI3K/mTOR signalling network uncovers biphasic dependence of mTORC1 activation on the mTORC2 subunit Sin1

Nguyen, L. K.·Ghomlaghi, M.·Shin, S.·Yang, G.·James, D. E.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The PI3K/mTOR signalling network critically regulates a broad array of important biological processes, including cell growth, metabolism and autophagy. Dysregulation of PI3K/mTOR signalling is associated with a variety of human diseases, including cancer and metabolic disorders. The mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a kinase that functions as a core catalytic subunit in two physically and functionally distinct complexes termed mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTORC2, which also share other common components such as mLTS8 (also known as G{beta}L) and DEPTOR. Despite being the subject of intensive research, a full picture of how mTORC1/2 assembly and activity are coordinated, and how they are functionally connected remain to be fully characterised. This is due primarily to the complex network wiring, featuring a growing number of intricate feedback loops and post-translational modifications, which require quantitative systems-level approaches to decipher. Here, we integrate predictive computational modelling, in vitro experiments and -omics data analysis to elucidate the dynamic and emergent features of the PI3K/mTOR network behavior. We construct new mechanistic models of the network that encapsulate novel critical mechanistic details, including mTORC1/2 coordination by mLTS8 (de)ubiquitination, and Akt-to-mTORC2 positive feedback loop. Model simulations subsequently confirmed by experimental validation revealed a previously unknown biphasic, threshold-gated dependence of mTORC1 activity on the key mTORC2 subunit Sin1, which is robust against cell-to-cell variation in protein expression. Furthermore, our results support the essential role of mLST8 in both mTORC1 and 2 activity, and suggest mLST8 could serve as a viable therapeutic target in breast cancer. Overall, our integrated analyses provide fresh systems-level insights into the dynamic behavior of PI3K/mTOR signalling and shed new light on the complexity of this important network. AUTHOR SUMMARYSignalling networks are the key information-processing machineries that underpin the ability of living cells to respond proportionately to extra- (and intra-) cellular cues. The PI3K/mTOR signalling network is one of the most important signalling networks in human cells that regulates cellular response to hormones such as insulin, yet our understanding of the network behaviour remains far from complete. Here, we employed a highly integrative approach that combines predictive mathematical modelling, biological experimentation, and data analysis to gain novel systems-level insights into PI3K/mTOR signalling. We constructed new mathematical models of this complex network incorporating important regulatory mechanisms. In contrary to commonly held views that mTORC2 lies upstream and is a positive regulator of mTORC1, we found that their relationship is highly nonlinear and dose dependent. This finding has major implications for mTORC2-directed anti-cancer strategies as depending on the cellular contexts, blocking mTORC2 may reduce or even enhance mTORC1 activation, the latter could inadvertently blunt the effect of mTORC2 blockade. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that mLST8 is required for the assembly and activity of both mTOR complexes, and suggest mLST8 is a viable therapeutic target in breast cancer, notably breast cancer.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

systems biologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nguyen, L. K., Ghomlaghi, M., Shin, S., Yang, G., James, D. E.. 2020-11-30. Dynamic modelling of the PI3K/mTOR signalling network uncovers biphasic dependence of mTORC1 activation on the mTORC2 subunit Sin1. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.30.403774

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Parsimonious Creatures: Building Gene Regulatory Networks Robust to Somatic Evolution

For early multicellular life to have formed and maintained cellular organization, preventing loss of controlled cell replication due to somatic evolution was of critical importance, and remains important to this day for control of cancer. We study how gene regulatory networks (GRNs) can be designed to slow the divergence of somatic clonal lineages in the context of early multicellular life. We model the mutation of GRNs within simplified 12-celled organisms we term "parsimonious creatures", who must replicate from a single cell to 12 cells and then prevent replication past 12 cells to maximize fitness. We found two minimal motifs can achieve these goals, but both are prone to breakdown through somatic evolution: The feedforward motif, which is loosely regulating but relatively robust, and the simple step motif, which uses strong interactions and feedback to form memoryless ultrasensitivity, but is fragile. These simple motifs may be duplicated to form redundant networks via one of two structures: averaging redundancy, which averages multiple sources of information, and min redundancy, which adopts the most conservative source. Averaging redundancy uniformly slows somatic evolution, while min redundancy stalls somatic evolution until neutral mutations accumulate. Either may be superior dependent on life history. However, averaging redundancy slowly increases fitness as the network becomes larger, but large min redundancy networks eventually become "paralyzed", increasing the probability of senescence and reducing fitness. These GRN designs are idealized, yet provide imperfect solutions with fundamental tradeoffs, offering insight as to why somatic evolution remains an incompletely solved problem for multicellular life.

systems biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Homogeneous network inference for subtype-stratified master regulator analysis in cancer

Master-regulator analysis of 34 TCGA tumour cohorts (cancer x molecular subtype; n between 27 and 562 tumours) requires one regulatory network per cohort. Mutual-information (MI) networks inferred with ARACNe3 are the usual choice, but they are not available for the smallest cohorts; filling the gap with correlation networks would mix two methods inside the very comparison between subtypes that the analysis is meant to make. We therefore infer every network with a single procedure, fixed-size Spearman regulons (FSR): rank correlation between regulator and target, a fixed effect-size threshold rho >= 0.2, the per-target data-processing-inequality (DPI) pruning implemented in corto, bootstrap support, and truncation to the 100 best-supported targets per regulator. We quantify what this choice concedes and what it provides, labelling each claim as a standard result, a heuristic, or an empirical result. Rank correlation is more powerful than the MI estimators we simulated for n < 200 but cannot see non-monotone dependence, which in a synthetic worst case costs at most about 0.05-0.10 of the master regulators recovered; the per-target DPI is a heuristic with a measurable disagreement rate with the MI-based one; and pairwise dependence is not direct interaction, for MI and correlation alike. Where both methods are feasible (n >= 95) they overlap in 0.7 of the top-20 regulators, the same as two filterings of the same ARACNe3 network, although the rank correlation of the full score vector shows a measurable method effect in the tail. Subsampling large real cohorts indicates that networks inferred from fewer than 60 tumours do not reliably reproduce their own cohort's master regulators, that 60-100 is a grey zone, and that a cancer-wide network does not rescue small subtypes. We present FSR as an adequate and uniform choice for multi-cohort analysis, not as a statistically superior one.

systems biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Low-fidelity simulator selection for multi-fidelity inference of epithelial vertex models

Vertex models link cell division, neighbour exchange, and intercellular forces to epithelial tissue form through parameters such as junctional line tension and perimeter contractility. Bayesian inference of these parameters from data quantifies their uncertainty, but for stochastic models of proliferating tissues it requires many costly simulations. Multi-fidelity simulation-based inference reduces this cost by training on many runs of a cheaper, less accurate ('low-fidelity') simulator before refining with a few full ('high-fidelity') runs. Low-fidelity versions can be constructed in several ways, for example by stopping simulations early, coarsening the timestep, or averaging fewer replicates, but it is unclear which to choose before committing to costly training. To address this, we introduce PRISM (Paired Ranking Index for Simulator Matching), a screen that compares each candidate with the full simulator on paired runs, scoring agreement in cell-packing statistics against cost. For a vertex model of a proliferating tissue, PRISM flags stopping early as unreliable before training; once trained, this choice can produce confidently wrong parameter estimates. By contrast, a coarser timestep, within the range tested, is cheap and accurate; while fewer replicates are accurate but too costly. Using a screened low-fidelity simulator, multi-fidelity inference outperforms approximate Bayesian computation and neural-network inference trained on full simulations alone, at matched cost and with well-calibrated uncertainty. The same pattern recurs for a second vertex model fitted to published Drosophila pupal-wing imaging data, although there stopping halfway proves safe. Together, our findings suggest that which approximations are safe depends on the model, and that screening them before training makes multi-fidelity inference of tissue mechanics practical.

systems biology↗