Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2020.11.30.403741

Estimating disease spread using structured coalescent andbirth-death models: A quantitative comparison

Seidel, S.·Stadler, T.·Vaughan, T.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Understanding how disease transmission occurs between subpopulations is critically important for guiding disease control efforts irrespective of whether the subpopulations represent geographically separated people, age or risk groups. The structured coalescent (SC) and the multitype birth-death (MBD) model can both be used to infer migration rates between subpopulations from phylogenies reconstructed from pathogen genetic sequences. However, the two classes of phylodynamic methods rely on different assumptions. Here, we report on a simulation study which compares inferences made using these models for a variety of migration rates in both endemic diseases and epidemic outbreaks. For the epidemic outbreak, we found that the MBD recovers the true migration rates better than the SC regardless of migration rate. We hypothesize that the inaccurate SC estimates stem from the its assumption of a constant population size. For the endemic scenario, our analysis shows that both models obtain a similar coverage of the migration rates, while the SC provides slightly narrower posterior intervals. Irrespective of the scenario, both models estimate the root location with similar coverage. Our study provides concrete modelling advice for infectious disease analysts. For endemic disease either model can be used, while for epidemic outbreaks the MBD should be the model of choice. Additionally, our study reveals the need to develop the SC further such that varying population sizes can easily be taken into account. Author summaryControlling an infectious disease requires us to quantify and understand how it spreads through pools of susceptible individuals, defined by their belonging to different geographical regions, age or risk groups. Rates of pathogen movement between these pools can be inferred from pathogen phylogenies which are themselves reconstructed from pathogen genetic sequences collected from infected individuals. Two popular foundations for such models are the multitype birth-death model and the structured coalescent. Although these models fulfill the same purpose, they differ in their assumptions and can, hence, produce contrasting results. To assess the appropriateness of the models in different situations, we performed a simulation study. We find that, for endemic diseases, both models are able to estimate the migration parameters reliably. For epidemic outbreaks, however, the multitype birth-death model obtains better estimates of the migration rates. We hypothesize that the structured coalescents inaccurate estimates for the epidemic scenario arise because it assumes a constant number of infected individuals through time.

Explore related subjects

bioinformaticsPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Seidel, S., Stadler, T., Vaughan, T.. 2020-11-30. Estimating disease spread using structured coalescent andbirth-death models: A quantitative comparison. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.30.403741

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

RoDPAA: A Robust Dissimilarity-Based Principal Angle Analysis Framework for Multi-View Microbiome Data Integration

Multiview microbiome studies profile the same participants across body sites or molecular layers, but integration is hampered by sparse, compositional data, modest sample sizes and methods that recognize only exact sharing. We present RoDPAA (Robust Dissimilarity-based Principal Angle Analysis), a framework that represents each view through any data-appropriate dissimilarity, such as Bray--Curtis, without log-ratio transformation or likelihood assumptions. RoDPAA aligns view-specific signal subspaces through principal angles, captures complete and partial sharing, and tests by permutation how many components are shared, using only eigendecomposition and little tuning. In Gaussian simulations, RoDPAA matched JIVE and MOFA given true ranks, ran faster and alone recovered the shared dimension in every replicate. In two inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) cohorts with sparse, zero-inflated data, Bray--Curtis-based RoDPAA recovered shared structure that was stable to prevalence filtering, whereas log-ratio-based alternatives were not. Its leading microbiome--metabolome factors, learned without disease labels, were the only ones associated with IBD.

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

Deducing splicing events from transcript sets with splicelogic

Long-read RNA sequencing captures a greater proportion of full-length transcripts, enabling more accurate isoform identification, discovery of novel isoforms, and more precise differential transcript usage analysis. However, comparing transcripts, whether between conditions or between sets such as novel and annotated isoforms, yields complex isoform changes that are hard to manipulate, summarize, and visualize. This is compounded by vertical integration of some tools, where downstream analysis depends on the specific output of a particular upstream tool. To address this gap, we have developed splicelogic, an R/Bioconductor package that makes transcript-set comparisons biologically interpretable by turning them into discrete splicing events, such as exon skipping, alternative splice sites, intron retention, and alternative transcription start and end sites. We designed splicelogic to integrate easily with existing RNA-seq workflows and tools. The splicelogic functions are modular, readable, and extensible, making it easy for users to adapt core logic to their own custom scientific questions or novel splicing definitions. By obtaining interpretable splicing events from transcript changes, splicelogic enables downstream analyses, including annotation of RNA-binding protein recognition sites, alongside summary statistics and visualization. The splicelogic package is publicly available and distributed through Bioconductor.

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

Contrastive Learning Improves Generalization on M2OR Olfactory Binding Dataset

Olfaction-based biosensors stand to have profound impacts in fields such as medical diagnostics, national security, and drug discovery. A promising mode of vapor phase biodetection mimics volatile organic compound-olfactory receptor (VOC-OR) interactions with target-specific protein or peptide probes; however, lack of experimental coverage remains a core bottleneck. Current computational approaches aim to improve prediction of VOC-OR binding to reduce experimental burden, and current machine learning approaches fail to demonstrate a level of generalization that addresses current engineering challenges. Here, using the Molecular to Olfactory Dataset (M2OR) and Insect Olfactory Binding Protein Database (iOBPdb) datasets, data partitioning methods and their performance are evaluated on a neural network and contrastive learning framework on such VOC-OR binding datasets, varying: model training, architecture, and structure of the input data distribution. It was found that holding out certain chemical or proteomic motifs from the training data diminished model performance with a two layer neural network model. The model was able to generalize to state of the art performance (0.88 AUCROC) on every data split by applying a contrastive learning objective defined by shared molecular constituents and a stochastic sampler. This suggests the contrastive objective provides a strong inductive bias for neural networks to predict novel VOC-OR pairs. These findings highlight that model performance on pairwise biological interaction datasets can be inflated through identity leakage from constituent overlap, and emphasize the need for more robust evaluation protocols. Furthermore, we show contrastive regularization mitigates dataset degeneracy through enforcement of compatibility in the models latent geometry that may extend to other binder target-datasets where identity leakage confounds evaluation.

bioinformatics↗