Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2020.07.20.212845

Magnetic Temporal Interference For Noninvasive, High-resolution, and Localized Deep Brain Stimulation: Concept Validation

Zaeimbashi, M.·Khalifa, A.·Dong, C.·Wei, Y.·Cash, S.·Sun, N.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Non-invasive deep brain stimulation has been a major challenge in the field of neuroscience and brain stimulation in the past three decades. Current brain stimulation technologies suffer from such hurdles as the inability to do deep brain stimulation, poor spatial resolution, and invasiveness. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) technique, for instance, cannot target brain regions deeper than [~]2cm and has a poor spatial resolution, impacting a large area of the peripheral region and leading to various side effects. Implantable electrodes, even though effective for deep brain stimulation, are invasive and carry various drawbacks related to the surgery and site infection. In this paper, we propose a new concept that relies on temporal interference of two high- frequency magnetic fields generated by two electromagnetic coils. The neural system does not respond to each of these high-frequency magnetic fields alone because of the intrinsic low-pass filtering properties of the neural membrane. The peripheral areas of the brain are impacted only by the high-frequency magnetic fields that cannot stimulate the nerves, while the deep brain area where the two fields interfere experiences a magnetic field that contains a low-frequency envelope and therefore the nerves can be stimulated. This technique can noninvasively focus a magnetic or electric beam at any depth inside the brain with a high resolution, without impacting the peripheral regions.

Explore related subjects

bioengineeringPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zaeimbashi, M., Khalifa, A., Dong, C., Wei, Y., Cash, S., Sun, N.. 2020-07-21. Magnetic Temporal Interference For Noninvasive, High-resolution, and Localized Deep Brain Stimulation: Concept Validation. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.20.212845

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Engineered microvessel networks -- Longitudinal transcriptomic profiling validates chip-grown tissues as a robust model for studying vasculature

Vascularised Organ-on-Chip (OoC) models are promising New Approach Methodologies (NAMs), but their translation requires validation for defined Contexts of Use (CoU). Here, we combine microfluidic microvessel networks (MVNs) with longitudinal bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing to determine how cell provenance influences engineered vascular phenotype. Stromal cell identity produced distinct network architectures and transcriptional trajectories, demonstrating that support cells, commonly treated as interchangeable, represent an important CoU variable. Primary human pancreatic microvascular endothelial cells failed to form stable perfusable networks, but supplementation with 10% Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs) or Blood Outgrowth Endothelial Cells (BOECs) rescued self-assembly. Single-cell transcriptomics identified specialised endothelial populations associated with vascular morphogenesis, including tip, stalk, phalanx, endothelial to mesenchymal transition (EndMT) and pericyte-like endothelial cells. Failed networks lacked coherent endothelial specialisation, whereas rescued networks restored stabilising cell states and revealed FLRT2--UNC5B signalling within pericyte-like HUVECs, recapitulating a pathway implicated in angiogenic development in vivo. These findings establish cell provenance as a critical determinant of microvascular NAM performance and demonstrate how transcriptomic validation can define and strengthen the biological relevance of microvessel-on-chip models for specific CoUs.

bioengineering↗
bioRxiv2026

Benchmarking foundation models for resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging time series in cognitive aging research

Foundation models trained on large neuroimaging datasets could help smaller studies investigate cognition from brain recordings. However, whether the foundation model-derived representations improve assessment of current cognition, prediction of follow-up cognition, or characterization of cognitive change remains unclear. We evaluated nine configurations from five model families that process regional resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging time series, using 3,103 scans from 1,653 participants across two observational and five intervention aging cohorts. Primary frozen representations showed no consistent superiority over conventional functional connectivity for concurrent cognitive associations or diagnostic classification. Changing the readout improved selected concurrent cognitive associations without updating model weights, indicating that performance depended partly on how representations were extracted. Additional post-training and embedding alignment yielded gains in selected settings but did not consistently improve performance across outcomes. In the primary longitudinal analyses, imaging representations did not establish added value beyond baseline clinical measures. These findings show that readout choice influences concurrent cognitive associations, while the added value of these representations for longitudinal outcomes remains unestablished.

bioengineering↗
bioRxiv2026

PROST: An Open Toolbox, Harmonised Multi-Lab Dataset, and Meta-Analysis of Ankle-Foot Roll-Over Shape

The ankle-foot roll-over shape (ROS) is the sagittal-plane path of the centre of pressure (CoP) during the stance phase of walking, expressed in a shank-based coordinate system. It describes the effective rocker geometry that emerges from both the shape and the elastic deformation of the ankle-foot system during walking, and informs prosthetic and orthotic design. Previous studies characterised ROS in small samples with differing laboratory protocols, so they have not systematically assessed inter-individual variability or its relation to anthropometrics. We developed the open-source Public ROS Toolbox (PROST) for standardised ROS computation, and used it to harmonise marker trajectories, ground reaction forces and CoP data from four public gait datasets collected in independent laboratories. For each leg, we fitted a circular arc to the pooled ROS of all its stance phases. In a one-stage individual-participant data meta-analysis, linear mixed-effects models, with dataset as a fixed effect and participant as a random intercept, related the arc radius and the horizontal coordinate of the circle centre to anthropometrics, and, in the two self-selected-speed datasets, to walking speed. The harmonised dataset comprises 249 participants and 5,667 stance phases at walking speeds of 0.7-8.5 km/h. Circular arcs fitted the ROS closely (mean RMS radial residual 1.9 mm). The radius had a median of 410.3 mm (interquartile range, IQR, 237.6 mm), and the circle centre lay posterior to the ankle (median -20.6 mm, IQR 49.5 mm). Between-participant differences, quantified by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), accounted for 42% of the variance in log radius (95% CI 25-57%) and 47% of the variance in the horizontal coordinate of the circle centre (95% CI 24-65%). Anthropometrics explained a negligible share of this variance (radius: pseudo-R2 -0.001, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.12), and height normalisation did not reduce radius variability (robust coefficient of variation 43% with and without normalisation). Faster self-selected walking was associated with a larger radius and a more posterior circle centre. To our knowledge, this study provides the first harmonised multi-lab ROS dataset. Together with the open-source toolbox, it is publicly available to support reproducible research in gait biomechanics, rehabilitation device design and clinical gait assessment. ROS geometry was participant-specific but was not predicted by age, sex, height or mass. A device ROS scaled from anthropometrics is therefore unlikely to match an individual's ROS, motivating studies of whether matching it, through device geometry and stiffness, improves gait mechanics.

bioengineering↗