Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2020.06.16.156158

Integrated metabolic modeling, culturing and transcriptomics explains enhanced virulence of V. cholerae during co-infection with ETEC

Abdel-Haleem, A. M.·Ravikumar, V.·Ji, B.·Mineta, K.·Gao, X.·Nielsen, J.·Gojobori, T.·Mijakovic, I.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Gene essentiality is altered during polymicrobial infections. Nevertheless, most studies rely on single-species infections to assess pathogen gene essentiality. Here, we use genome-scale metabolic models to explore the effect of co-infection of the diarrheagenic pathogen Vibrio cholerae (V. cholerae) with another enteric pathogen, enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC). Model predictions showed that V. cholerae metabolic capabilities were increased due to ample cross-feeding opportunities enabled by ETEC. This is in line with increased severity of cholera symptoms known to occur in patients with dual-infections by the two pathogens. In vitro co-culture systems confirmed that V. cholerae growth is enhanced in co-cultures relative to single-cultures. Further, expression levels of several V. cholerae metabolic genes were significantly perturbed as shown by dual RNAseq analysis of its co-cultures with different ETEC strains. A decrease in ETEC growth was also observed, probably mediated by non-metabolic factors. Single gene essentiality analysis predicted conditionally-independent genes that are essential for the pathogen’s growth in both single- and co-infection scenarios. Our results reveal growth differences that are of relevance to drug targeting and efficiency in polymicrobial infections.Importance Most studies proposing new strategies to manage and treat infections have been largely focused on identifying druggable targets that can inhibit a pathogen’s growth when it is the single cause of infection. In vivo, however, infections can be caused by multiple species. This is important to take into account when attempting to develop or use current antibacterials since their efficacy can change significantly between single and co-infections. In this study, we used genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) to interrogate the growth capabilities of Vibrio cholerae (V. cholerae) in single and co-infections with enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), which co-occur in large fraction of diarrheagenic patients. Co-infection model predictions showed that V. cholerae growth capabilities are enhanced in presence of ETEC relative to V. cholerae single-infection, through cross-fed metabolites made available to V. cholerae by ETEC. In vitro, co-cultures of the two enteric pathogens further confirmed model predictions showing an increased growth of V. cholerae in co-culture relative to V. cholerae single-cultures while ETEC growth was suppressed. Dual RNAseq analysis of the co-cultures also confirmed that the transcriptome of V. cholerae is distinct during co-infection compared to single infection scenarios where processes related to metabolism were significantly perturbed. Further, in silico gene-knock out simulations uncovered discrepancies in gene essentiality for V. cholerae growth between single and co-infections. Integrative model-guided analysis thus identified druggable targets that would be critical for V. cholerae growth in both single and co-infections, thus designing inhibitors against those targets would provide a broader spectrum coverage against cholera infections.View Full Text

Explore related subjects

systems biologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Abdel-Haleem, A. M., Ravikumar, V., Ji, B., Mineta, K., Gao, X., Nielsen, J., Gojobori, T., Mijakovic, I.. 2020-06-18. Integrated metabolic modeling, culturing and transcriptomics explains enhanced virulence of V. cholerae during co-infection with ETEC. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.16.156158

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Low-fidelity simulator selection for multi-fidelity inference of epithelial vertex models

Vertex models link cell division, neighbour exchange, and intercellular forces to epithelial tissue form through parameters such as junctional line tension and perimeter contractility. Bayesian inference of these parameters from data quantifies their uncertainty, but for stochastic models of proliferating tissues it requires many costly simulations. Multi-fidelity simulation-based inference reduces this cost by training on many runs of a cheaper, less accurate ('low-fidelity') simulator before refining with a few full ('high-fidelity') runs. Low-fidelity versions can be constructed in several ways, for example by stopping simulations early, coarsening the timestep, or averaging fewer replicates, but it is unclear which to choose before committing to costly training. To address this, we introduce PRISM (Paired Ranking Index for Simulator Matching), a screen that compares each candidate with the full simulator on paired runs, scoring agreement in cell-packing statistics against cost. For a vertex model of a proliferating tissue, PRISM flags stopping early as unreliable before training; once trained, this choice can produce confidently wrong parameter estimates. By contrast, a coarser timestep, within the range tested, is cheap and accurate; while fewer replicates are accurate but too costly. Using a screened low-fidelity simulator, multi-fidelity inference outperforms approximate Bayesian computation and neural-network inference trained on full simulations alone, at matched cost and with well-calibrated uncertainty. The same pattern recurs for a second vertex model fitted to published Drosophila pupal-wing imaging data, although there stopping halfway proves safe. Together, our findings suggest that which approximations are safe depends on the model, and that screening them before training makes multi-fidelity inference of tissue mechanics practical.

systems biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Calibrating developmental dynamics from single-cell atlases: lineage paths outrun least-action routes

Single-cell atlases infer developmental dynamics from destructive snapshots, yet how far realized lineage paths depart from such inferred dynamics has never been measured with controls. We introduce LADD (Least-Action Developmental Dynamics), a measurement framework that learns a stochastic developmental vector field from time-series single-cell RNA-seq and computes minimum-action and minimum-time paths, together with a three-layer calibration protocol that separates genuine path deviation from the generic cost of centroid measurement, and we compare its forecasting component with optimal-transport and flow-matching methods. In the lineage-resolved Caenorhabditis elegans atlas, the raw action ratio of observed lineage-centroid trajectories to optimal paths is 3.79, yet forward-simulated ensembles of the learned model itself score 2.07, leaving a genuine excess of about two-fold. In zebrafish (Danio rerio), the observed ratio sits entirely at the model's floor. Three mechanisms that could explain the residual deviation (detours, flow-opposition, and fate-map complexity) are each excluded; what remains is speed, with lineages moving 30-43% faster along the learned flow. We report validity boundaries for temporal resolution, cross-species comparison, and energetic interpretation, delimiting where action-based trajectory comparisons are meaningful.

systems biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Choice of annotation data significantly impacts automated reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic networks

Genome-scale metabolic models are valuable tools for studying metabolism in many applications, such as metabolic engineering or understanding human disease. However, curated models are available for only a limited number of organisms, and generating high-quality models for additional organisms remains a challenge. To help address this challenge, several software tools have been developed that can produce draft models in an automated fashion, but the quality of these draft models lags behind manually curated ones. Thus, there is still a need to improve these tools. Previous work has focused primarily on developing better methods for each step in the reconstruction process, such as gene annotation and gap-filling. Here, we focus on the data that underlies these methods, such as known connections between protein sequence and function. We find that changing the source of reconstruction data has a substantial impact on the contents and predictions of generated models. In fact, the source of data can have a bigger impact than the choice of reconstruction method. Additionally, we show that the reconstruction process is sensitive to the accuracy of gene annotations in the reconstruction data. Finally, we demonstrate the importance of having functional annotation data from an organism that is closely related to the one for which a model is being built. These observations highlight the importance of reconstruction data and identify principles that should be considered when selecting data for reconstruction tools.

systems biology↗