bioRxiv · 10.1101/2020.06.10.145144
Hydroxychloroquine Proves Ineffective in Hamsters and Macaques Infected with SARS-CoV-2
Abstract
We remain largely without effective prophylactic/therapeutic interventions for COVID-19. Although many human clinical trials are ongoing, there remains a deficiency of supportive preclinical drug efficacy studies. Here we assessed the prophylactic/therapeutic efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), a drug of interest for COVID-19 management, in two animal models. When used for prophylaxis or treatment neither the standard human malaria dose (6.5 mg/kg) nor a high dose (50 mg/kg) of HCQ had any beneficial effect on clinical disease or SARS-CoV-2 kinetics (replication/shedding) in the Syrian hamster disease model. Similarly, HCQ prophylaxis/treatment (6.5 mg/kg) did not significantly benefit clinical outcome nor reduce SARS-CoV-2 replication/shedding in the upper and lower respiratory tract in the rhesus macaque disease model. In conclusion, our preclinical animal studies do not support the use of HCQ in prophylaxis/treatment of COVID-19.One Sentence Summary Hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis/treatment showed no beneficial effect in SARS-CoV-2 hamster and macaque disease models.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Rosenke, K., Jarvis, M., Feldmann, F., Schwarz, B., Okumura, A., Lovaglio, J., Saturday, G., Hanley, P., Meade-White, K., Williamson, B., Hansen, F., Perez-Perez, L., Leventhal, S., Tang-Huau, T.-L., Nason, M., Callison, J., Haddock, E., Scott, D., Sewell, G., Bosio, C., Hawman, D., de Wit, E., Feldmann, H.. 2020-06-11. Hydroxychloroquine Proves Ineffective in Hamsters and Macaques Infected with SARS-CoV-2. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.10.145144
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.