Search bioRxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2020.05.06.081612

pegFinder: A pegRNA designer for CRISPR prime editing

Chow, R. D.·Chen, S.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

To the EditorCRISPR technologies have been widely adopted as powerful tools for targeted genomic manipulation 1. Recently, a new CRISPR-based strategy for precision genome editing was developed that enables diverse genomic alterations to be directly written into target sites without requiring double-strand breaks (DSBs) or donor templates 2. Termed prime editing, this approach involves two key components: 1) a catalytically impaired Cas9 nickase fused to a reverse transcriptase (PE2), and 2) a multifunctional prime editing guide RNA (pegRNA) that specifies the target site and further acts as a template for reverse transcription (RT). pegRNAs are similar to standard single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs), but additionally have a customizable extension on the 3 end. The 3 extension is composed of a RT template that encodes the desired edit and a primer binding site (PBS) that anneals to the target genomic site to prime the RT reaction 2. These additional components considerably increase the complexity of pegRNA design compared to standard sgRNAs. While many tools have been developed for identifying candidate sgRNAs in a target DNA sequence 3-8, no user-friendly web application currently exists for designing pegRNAs. We therefore developed pegFinder, a streamlined web tool that rapidly designs candidate pegRNAs (Figure 1). The pegFinder web portal is freely available at http://pegfinder.sidichenlab.org/ (Supplementary Figure 1). O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=168 SRC="FIGDIR/small/081612v1_fig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (28K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1494188org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6d80ccorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@122eaf1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16e8e71_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 1:C_FLOATNO pegFinder: A pegRNA designer for CRISPR prime editing Schematic of the pegFinder workflow for designing CRISPR prime editing pegRNAs. The user provides the wildtype DNA sequence, and the edited DNA sequence. Optionally, the user can include the results from sgRNA designer tools to pegFinder, or specify a preselected sgRNA spacer to be used for pegRNA design. pegFinder then generates a pegRNA that can be used to engineer the desired alterations. pegFinder also reports alternative RT templates and PBS sequences of varying lengths that can be swapped into the pegRNA for downstream experimental optimization. pegFinder further reports secondary nicking sgRNAs that can increase prime editing efficiency (PE3 method). C_FIG O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=154 SRC="FIGDIR/small/081612v1_figS1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (25K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@149ba2corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15da377org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@96fe3borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10cfee0_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOSupplementary Figure 1:C_FLOATNO pegFinder web interface Screenshot of the pegFinder web interface, available at http://pegfinder.sidichenlab.org. C_FIG

Explore related subjects

bioengineeringPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chow, R. D., Chen, S.. 2020-05-08. pegFinder: A pegRNA designer for CRISPR prime editing. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.06.081612

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Comparative study of chlorophyll measurement in Physcomitrium patens moss using a conventional microscope adapted for combined 2D+1D imaging and spectral analysis

Imaging spectroscopy often requires expensive and complex equipment. Here we show a simple procedure for attaching a standard miniature fiber spectrometer to a conventional microscope, allowing easy integration of 2D imaging with 1D high-resolution spectral measurements. This combination provides much of the benefit of a full imaging spectrometer without the large equipment investment, and we provide instructions for modifying microscopes to this setup and the present measurements of living cells that demonstrate their performance. Using this setup, we compare the quantitative measurement of chlorophyll concentration in Physcomitrium patens moss using color imaging and spectral sampling.

bioengineering↗
bioRxiv2026

De novo designed single-domain antibodies protect against lethal cobra venom neurotoxicity in vivo

Generative protein design can now rapidly produce de novo binders with high affinity and functional activity against a wide range of targets, including lethal snake venom toxins. However, so far most reported successes rely on new-to-nature scaffolds with limited therapeutic precedent. Single-domain antibodies (VHHs) offer a clinically validated alternative scaffold that can bind and neutralize long-chain -neurotoxins, which are some of the most lethal components in snake venoms. Here we compare three recently established de novo design models with VHH-design capabilities (Germinal, RFantibody, and BoltzGen) for their ability to generate VHHs against the neurotoxin -cobratoxin from the monocled cobra (Naja kaouthia). Using standardized model inputs and evaluation criteria based on AlphaFold3 interface confidence (ipTM) and RMSD self-consistency, we find that Germinal was the only method to generate designs passing stringent in silico criteria for experimental testing. We therefore performed a larger Germinal design campaign employing three different VHH frameworks and experimentally validated 46 designs in vitro. Of these, 42 expressed as soluble proteins and we identified four binding hits derived from two of the three tested frameworks. Of the four binders, two lead candidates were further characterized and demonstrated high affinity (KDs of 4.1 nM and 10.8 nM), monomeric behavior and low polyreactivity, indicating favorable biophysical and developability properties, as well as functional toxin neutralization in vitro. To assess their therapeutic potential we investigated their ability to protect against -cobratoxin toxicity in vivo. Both candidates fully protected mice after -cobratoxin challenge, with 100% survival compared to a lethal control. One candidate also retained notable neutralization capacity against whole venom of Naja kaouthia with a survival of 56%, while the other protected 22% when tested in a rescue setting. Together, we demonstrate that de novo VHH design can generate high affinity single-domain antibodies with in vivo protection against lethal cobra venom neurotoxicity, and provide practical insights into method- and framework-dependent performance.

bioengineering↗
bioRxiv2026

Simple Feedback for Complex Movement: Capturing Whole-Limb Reorganization during Single-IMU Gait Retraining

Clinical gait retraining typically relies on multi-sensor arrays and high-dimensional feedback displays, imposing setup and interpretation burdens that limit routine clinical deployment. We developed a single-IMU visual biofeedback system that delivers real-time feedback of Lower Limb Trajectory Error (LLTE), a composite kinematic error metric integrating knee position and shank angle across the stance phase. Twenty able-bodied adults walked on a treadmill under two visual biofeedback targets (flexed-knee, extended-knee) while receiving either corrected (n=10) or uncorrected (n=8) feedback, where the correction accounted for limb orientation at initial contact. LLTE and stance-phase knee kinematics adapted consistently under the flexed-knee target for both feedback groups, with feedback formulation moderating the temporal trajectory of change. Adaptation toward the extended-knee target was limited, likely because participants were already operating near terminal knee extension and because the scalar error metric provided limited directional information for correction. Ankle range of motion (ROM) changed significantly across the stance phase under both target conditions, while hip ROM did not. Multiscale multivariate sample entropy (MSMVSE) increased monotonically with time scale across all conditions, with no statistically distinguishable difference between corrected and uncorrected feedback. These results suggest that single-IMU LLTE biofeedback can modify gait mechanics and that adaptation was expressed across multiple lower-limb segments rather than through changes at a single joint.

bioengineering↗