Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2020.04.10.035717

Discovery of pharmaceutically-targetable pathways and prediction of survivorship for pneumonia and sepsis patients from the view point of ensemble gene noise

Abstract

Finding novel biomarkers for human pathologies and predicting clinical outcomes for patients is rather challenging. This stems from the heterogenous response of individuals to disease which is also reflected in the inter-individual variability of gene expression responses. This in turn obscures differential gene expression analysis (DGE). In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, we wondered whether an alternative to DGE approaches could be applied to dissect the molecular nature of a host-response to infection exemplified here by an analysis of H1N1 influenza, community/hospital acquired pneumonia (CAP) and sepsis. To this end, we turned to the analysis of ensemble gene noise. Ensemble gene noise, as we defined it here, represents a variance within an individual for a collection of genes encoding for either members of known biological pathways or subunits of annotated protein complexes. From the law of total variance, ensemble gene noise depends on the stoichiometry of the ensemble genes expression and on their average noise (variance). Thus, rather than focusing on specific genes, ensemble gene noise allows for the holistic identification and interpretation of gene expression disbalance on the level of gene networks and systems. Comparing H1N1, CAP and sepsis patients we spotted common disturbances in a number of pathways/protein complexes relevant to the sepsis pathology which lead to an increase in the ensemble gene noise. Among others, these include mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I and peroxisomes which could be readily targeted for adjuvant treatment by methylene blue and 4-phenylbutyrate respectively. Finally, we showed that ensemble gene noise could be successfully applied for the prediction of clinical outcome, namely mortality, of CAP and sepsis patients. Thus, we conclude that ensemble gene noise represents a promising approach for the investigation of molecular mechanisms of a pathology through a prism of alterations in coherent expression of gene circuits.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

de Jong, T. V., Guryev, V., Moshkin, Y. M.. 2020-04-11. Discovery of pharmaceutically-targetable pathways and prediction of survivorship for pneumonia and sepsis patients from the view point of ensemble gene noise. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.10.035717

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Accelerating discovery and integration from RNA to Protein with R2T2P

Integrating transcriptomics and proteomics data remains an unmet challenge in the post-genomics era, discouraging researchers from pursuing integrative approaches to molecular biology research. Leveraging the power of translation profiling, we present RNA to Translation to Protein (R2T2P), a computational platform integrating genome-guided transcriptome assembly with identification of translation and proteins, including a tailored differential analysis framework and support for multiple reference transcriptomes. We applied R2T2P to investigate a cellular model of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), where ectopic expression of the DUX4 retrogene in skeletal muscle triggers significant alterations in transcription and RNA metabolism. We uncovered hundreds of uncharacterized, highly overexpressed RNAs, including antisense and alternative transcripts, and quantified their contribution to translatome and proteome. Re-analysis of expression datasets from patient-derived myotubes and muscle biopsies validated this alternative transcriptome in FSHD patients, adding a reservoir of bona-fide novel molecular actors in a rare disease. Available at https://github.com/nfdata-omics/R2T2P/, R2T2P is a flexible and powerful workflow in modern integrative biology.

bioinformatics↗

MorphoANOVA: Dissecting Histology-Gene Expression Relationships in Spatial Transcriptomics

Spatial transcriptomics (ST) measures the expression of hundreds to thousands of genes within tissue architecture, often accompanied by histology images. However, it remains challenging to systematically characterize which genes exhibit associations with tissue morphology, whether these associations vary spatially, and which genes show additional spatial expression patterns beyond those captured by morphology. Here we introduce MorphoANOVA, a gene-wise statistical framework for characterizing morphology--expression relationships across genes measured by ST. Using nested spatially varying coefficient models and sequential ANOVA, MorphoANOVA assesses slide-wide associations with an H\&E-derived morphology feature, location-specific changes in these associations, and additional spatial variation after accounting for the selected feature. The resulting statistics enable gene prioritization and pathway enrichment analysis, while spatial component maps support the interpretation of individual genes. Simulations demonstrate MorphoANOVA's ability to distinguish the modeled components and recover their spatial patterns. Applications to human cortex and breast cancer identify biological programs associated with different morphology--expression patterns and reveal distinct relationships with cell composition. Across three HER2-positive breast cancer patients, invasive-cancer marker genes consistently exhibit stronger evidence of location-specific morphology associations. MorphoANOVA thus provides a framework for systematically interpreting spatial gene-expression patterns in relation to tissue morphology.

bioinformatics↗

Evaluation effects can rival reported concordance gains in cross-cancer survival prediction

Studies of cross-cancer learning for survival prediction from tumour omics have reported concordance gains of 0.020 and 0.045, but how such gains compare with evaluation effects remains unclear. We examined these effects across 13 TCGA cancers (5,761 patients, 1,526 disease-specific deaths), using five repeats of five-fold cross-validation and paired bootstrap intervals. When model selection did not use test data, our borrowing model gained 0.009 (95% interval 0.001 to 0.016) over its target-fitted reference when cancers received equal weight (post hoc). Random-effects pooling gave a gain of 0.002 (-0.002 to 0.006), with most weight assigned to cancers where the model made little use of the pretrained score. Choosing the fusion weight on test splits raised the apparent equal-weight gain to 0.017. We reimplemented a published method, VAECox, which showed no pretraining gain over random initialisation at the last or validation-selected training step. Choosing each network's best test step, as the published code does, raised concordance by 0.03 to 0.05 across the 13-cancer and ten-cancer overall-survival settings, but barely changed the difference between networks. In a constructed post hoc experiment, choosing the best test step only for the pretrained network changed the equal-weight mean difference from -0.004 to +0.045 (+0.035 to +0.054). Across seven multi-omics comparisons, estimates from single five-fold runs differed from their cancer's five-run mean by at least 0.02 in 11% to 42% of runs. Concordance was about 0.02 lower at held-out tissue source sites. Interpreting a reported gain therefore requires each model's selection rule, variation across repeated partitions, the weighting of cancers and the evaluation population.

bioinformatics↗