Competitive ecosystems are robustly stabilized by structured environments

Abstract

Natural environments, like soils or the mammalian gut, frequently contain microbial consortia competing within a niche, wherein many species contain genetic mechanisms of interspecies competition. Recent computational work suggests that physical structures in the environment can stabilize competition between species that would otherwise be subject to competitive exclusion under isotropic conditions. Here we employ Lotka-Volterra models to show that physical structure stabilizes large competitive ecological networks, even with significant differences in the strength of competitive interactions between species. We show that for stable communities the length-scale of physical structure inversely correlates with the width of the distribution of competitive fitness, such that physical environments with finer structure can sustain a broader spectrum of interspecific competition. These results highlight the generic stabilizing effects of physical structure on microbial communities and lay groundwork for engineering structures that stabilize and/or select for diverse communities of ecological, medical, or industrial utility. AUTHOR SUMMARYNatural environments often have many species competing for the same resources and frequently one species will out-compete others. This poses the fundamental question of how a diverse array of species can coexist in a resource limited environment. Among other mechanisms, previous studies examined how interactions between species - like cooperation or predation - could lead to stable biodiversity. In this work we looked at this question from a different angle: we used computational models to examine the role that the environment itself might play in stabilizing competing species. We modeled how species arrange themselves in space when the environment contains objects that alter the interfaces along which competing species meet. We found that these structured environments stabilize species coexistence, across a range of density of those objects and in a way that was robust to differing strengths of interspecies competition. Thus, in addition to biological factors, our work presents a generic mechanism by which the environment itself can influence ecological outcomes and biodiversity.