bioRxiv · 10.1101/2019.12.22.886440
Detection of genome-wide low-frequency mutations with Paired-End and Complementary Consensus Sequencing (PECC-Seq) revealed end-repair derived artifacts as residual errors
Abstract
To improve the accuracy and the cost-efficiency of next-generation sequencing in ultralow-frequency mutation detection, we developed the Paired-End and Complementary Consensus Sequencing (PECC-Seq), a PCR-free duplex consensus sequencing approach. PECC-Seq employed shear points as endogenous barcodes to identify consensus sequences from the overlap in the shortened, complementary DNA strands-derived paired-end reads for sequencing error correction. With the high accuracy of PECC-Seq, we identified the characteristic base substitution errors introduced by the end-repair process of mechanical fragmentation-based library preparations, which were prominent at the terminal 6 bp of the library fragments in the 5-NpCpA-3 or 5-NpCpT-3 trinucleotide context. As demonstrated at the human genome scale (TK6 cells), after removing these potential end-repair artifacts from the terminal 6 bp, PECC-Seq could reduce the sequencing error frequency to mid-10-7 with a relatively low sequencing depth. For TA base pairs, the background error rate could be suppressed to mid-10-8. In mutagen-treated TK6, slight increases in mutagen treatment-related mutant frequencies could be detected, indicating the potential of PECC-Seq in detecting genome-wide ultra-rare mutations. In addition, our finding on the patterns of end-repair artifacts may provide new insights in further reducing technical errors not only for PECC-Seq, but also for other next-generation sequencing techniques.
Source connections
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
You, X., Thiruppathi, S., Liu, W., Cao, Y., Naito, M., Furihata, C., Honma, M., Luan, Y., Suzuki, T.. 2019-12-23. Detection of genome-wide low-frequency mutations with Paired-End and Complementary Consensus Sequencing (PECC-Seq) revealed end-repair derived artifacts as residual errors. https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.22.886440
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.