Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2019.12.13.874909

Survey of Public Assay Data: Opportunities and Challenges to Understanding Antimicrobial Resistance

Abstract

ABSTRACTComputational learning methods allow researchers to make predictions, draw inferences, and automate generation of mathematical models. These models are crucial to solving real world problems, such as antimicrobial resistance, pathogen detection, and protein evolution. Machine learning methods depend upon ground truth data to achieve specificity and sensitivity. Since the data is limited in this case, as we will show during the course of this paper, and as the size of available data increases super-linearly, it is of paramount importance to understand the distribution of ground truth data and the analyses it is suited and where it may have limitations that bias downstream learning methods. In this paper, we focus on training data required to model antimicrobial resistance (AR). We report an analysis of bacterial biochemical assay data associated with whole genome sequencing (WGS) from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), and discuss important implications when making use of assay data, utilizing genetic features as training data for machine learning models. Complete discussion of machine learning model implementation is outside the scope of this paper and the subject to a later publication. The antimicrobial assay data was obtained from NCBI BioSample, which contains descriptive information about the physical biological specimen from which experimental data is obtained and the results of those experiments themselves.[1] Assay data includes minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of antibiotics, links to associated microbial WGS data, and treatment of a particular microorganism with antibiotics. We observe that there is minimal microbial data available for many antibiotics and for targeted taxonomic groups. The antibiotics with the highest number of assays have less than 1500 measurements each. Corresponding bias in available assays makes machine learning problematic for some important microbes and for building more advanced models that can work across microbial genera. In this study we focus, therefore, on the antibiotic with most assay data (tetracycline) and the corresponding genus with the most available sequence (Acinetobacter with 14000 measurements across 49 antibiotic compounds). Using this data for training and testing, we observed contradictions in the distribution of assay outcomes and report methods to identify and resolve such conflicts. Per antibiotic, we find that there can be up to 30% of (resolvable) conflicting measurements. As more data becomes available, automated training data curation will be an important part of creating useful machine learning models to predict antibiotic resistance. CCS CONCEPTS* Applied computing [->] Computational biology; Computational genomics; Bioinformatics;

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Agarwal, A., Nayar, G., Kaufman, J.. 2019-12-13. Survey of Public Assay Data: Opportunities and Challenges to Understanding Antimicrobial Resistance. https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.13.874909

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Accelerating discovery and integration from RNA to Protein with R2T2P

Integrating transcriptomics and proteomics data remains an unmet challenge in the post-genomics era, discouraging researchers from pursuing integrative approaches to molecular biology research. Leveraging the power of translation profiling, we present RNA to Translation to Protein (R2T2P), a computational platform integrating genome-guided transcriptome assembly with identification of translation and proteins, including a tailored differential analysis framework and support for multiple reference transcriptomes. We applied R2T2P to investigate a cellular model of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), where ectopic expression of the DUX4 retrogene in skeletal muscle triggers significant alterations in transcription and RNA metabolism. We uncovered hundreds of uncharacterized, highly overexpressed RNAs, including antisense and alternative transcripts, and quantified their contribution to translatome and proteome. Re-analysis of expression datasets from patient-derived myotubes and muscle biopsies validated this alternative transcriptome in FSHD patients, adding a reservoir of bona-fide novel molecular actors in a rare disease. Available at https://github.com/nfdata-omics/R2T2P/, R2T2P is a flexible and powerful workflow in modern integrative biology.

bioinformatics↗

MorphoANOVA: Dissecting Histology-Gene Expression Relationships in Spatial Transcriptomics

Spatial transcriptomics (ST) measures the expression of hundreds to thousands of genes within tissue architecture, often accompanied by histology images. However, it remains challenging to systematically characterize which genes exhibit associations with tissue morphology, whether these associations vary spatially, and which genes show additional spatial expression patterns beyond those captured by morphology. Here we introduce MorphoANOVA, a gene-wise statistical framework for characterizing morphology--expression relationships across genes measured by ST. Using nested spatially varying coefficient models and sequential ANOVA, MorphoANOVA assesses slide-wide associations with an H\&E-derived morphology feature, location-specific changes in these associations, and additional spatial variation after accounting for the selected feature. The resulting statistics enable gene prioritization and pathway enrichment analysis, while spatial component maps support the interpretation of individual genes. Simulations demonstrate MorphoANOVA's ability to distinguish the modeled components and recover their spatial patterns. Applications to human cortex and breast cancer identify biological programs associated with different morphology--expression patterns and reveal distinct relationships with cell composition. Across three HER2-positive breast cancer patients, invasive-cancer marker genes consistently exhibit stronger evidence of location-specific morphology associations. MorphoANOVA thus provides a framework for systematically interpreting spatial gene-expression patterns in relation to tissue morphology.

bioinformatics↗

Evaluation effects can rival reported concordance gains in cross-cancer survival prediction

Studies of cross-cancer learning for survival prediction from tumour omics have reported concordance gains of 0.020 and 0.045, but how such gains compare with evaluation effects remains unclear. We examined these effects across 13 TCGA cancers (5,761 patients, 1,526 disease-specific deaths), using five repeats of five-fold cross-validation and paired bootstrap intervals. When model selection did not use test data, our borrowing model gained 0.009 (95% interval 0.001 to 0.016) over its target-fitted reference when cancers received equal weight (post hoc). Random-effects pooling gave a gain of 0.002 (-0.002 to 0.006), with most weight assigned to cancers where the model made little use of the pretrained score. Choosing the fusion weight on test splits raised the apparent equal-weight gain to 0.017. We reimplemented a published method, VAECox, which showed no pretraining gain over random initialisation at the last or validation-selected training step. Choosing each network's best test step, as the published code does, raised concordance by 0.03 to 0.05 across the 13-cancer and ten-cancer overall-survival settings, but barely changed the difference between networks. In a constructed post hoc experiment, choosing the best test step only for the pretrained network changed the equal-weight mean difference from -0.004 to +0.045 (+0.035 to +0.054). Across seven multi-omics comparisons, estimates from single five-fold runs differed from their cancer's five-run mean by at least 0.02 in 11% to 42% of runs. Concordance was about 0.02 lower at held-out tissue source sites. Interpreting a reported gain therefore requires each model's selection rule, variation across repeated partitions, the weighting of cancers and the evaluation population.

bioinformatics↗