Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/173856

Systematic analysis of atx-2 suppressors reveals a novel regulator of PAR-5/14-3-3sigma function during mitosis in Caenorhabditis elegans

Abstract

RNA regulation plays a critical role in mitosis, yet the mechanisms remain unclear. Our lab recently identified that the conserved RNA-Binding Protein (RBP), ATX-2, regulates cytokinesis by regulating the targeting of ZEN-4 to the spindle midzone through a conserved translation regulator, PAR-5/14-3-3sigma (Gnazzo et al., 2016). While co-depletion of ATX-2 and PAR-5 restored ZEN-4 targeting to the spindle midzone, it did not rescue cell division. To identify factors that may work in concert with ATX-2 to regulate cell division, we conducted a two-part, candidate RNAi suppressor and visual screen to identify factors that are important for cell division and also mediate the targeting of ATX-2 to the centrosomes and the spindle midzone. Using this approach, we identified ten genes that suppress the embryonic lethality defect observed in atx-2 mutant embryos. These ten genes, including act-2, cgh-1, cki-1, hum-6, par-2, rnp-4, vab-3, vhl-1, vps-24, and wve-1, all have some role regulating RNA or the cell cycle. Five of these genes (cgh-1, cki-1, vab-3, vhl-1, vps-24) fail to target ATX-2 to the centrosomes and midzone when depleted. The strongest suppressor of the atx-2 phenotype is the DEAD-box RNA helicase CGH-1/DDX6, which has been implicated in cell division, RNA processing and translation, and neuronal function. Loss of CGH-1 rescued the cytokinesis defect and also restored ZEN-4 localization to the spindle midzone. ATX-2 and CGH-1 are mutually required for their localization to centrosomes and the spindle midzone. Our findings provide the first functional evidence that CGH-1/DDX6 regulates ATX-2 function during mitosis to target ZEN-4 to the spindle midzone via PAR-5/14-3-3sigma. We suggest that RNA machinery is necessary for the completion of cytokinesis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gnazzo, M. M., Villarreal, A. R., Skop, A. R.. 2017-08-09. Systematic analysis of atx-2 suppressors reveals a novel regulator of PAR-5/14-3-3sigma function during mitosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. https://doi.org/10.1101/173856

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

A dynamic phosphoproteome reveals stage-specific regulation of cytokinesis in Leishmania

Leishmania parasites undergo extensive morphological and metabolic remodelling during their transition from motile insect promastigotes to non-motile intracellular amastigotes, yet how dynamic protein kinase signalling drives this process remains poorly understood. Here, we present a high-resolution temporal phosphoproteome of L. mexicana promastigote to axenic amastigote differentiation, profiling 16,495 phosphosites on 3,101 proteins across seven developmental time points and identifying 5,795 dynamically regulated sites. This temporal map reveals stage-specific signalling programs, including regulated sites in MPK2 and non-regulated sites in MRK1, protein kinases known to be essential for amastigote differentiation. Using analogue-sensitive (AS) chemical genetics, we show that acute inhibition of either kinase in axenic amastigotes disrupts the spatial coordination of cleavage furrow ingression with nuclear and kinetoplast segregation, revealing essential cytokinesis roles obscured in constitutive gene deletions. Despite generating similar cytokinesis phenotypes, genetic over-expression and cellular localisation analyses demonstrate that MPK2 and MRK1 act through spatially segregated signalling pathways. Time-resolved phosphoproteomics upon MPK2 inhibition places its activity upstream of cytoskeletal remodelling networks. Importantly, we show that the stage-specific requirement for MPK2 is defined by the parasite's morphology: while motile promastigotes tolerate MPK2 inhibition, genetic ablation of flagellar motility sensitises them to loss of MPK2 activity. Thus, flagellar motility acts as a mechanical buffer during promastigote division, explaining why non-motile amastigotes are vulnerable to MPK2 inhibition. Together, our findings provide a systems level framework for Leishmania signalling and demonstrate that cellular architecture and biomechanics dictate protein kinase dependency across developmental stages of the parasite.

cell biology↗

Single-cell Transcriptome-Proteome-PTMome(x8)-Metabolome (scTPPM) co-profiling decodes multimodal regulation during mouse oocyte meiosis

Single-cell multi-omics technology is crucial for comprehensive characterization of cellular molecular features. Despite recent advances in single-cell multi-omics approaches, co-profiling of nucleic acids, proteins, metabolites, and post-translational modifications (PTMs) within the same cell individuals remains major challenges. Here, we developed a single-cell transcriptome, proteome, PTMome, and metabolome (scTPPM) profiling approach, enabling simultaneous analysis of transcriptomes, proteomes, eight types of PTMs (e.g., phosphorylation, methylation, ubiquitination, O_GlcNAc, acetylation, crotonylation, lactylation, and succinylation), and metabolomes in individual cells. We demonstrated the scTPPM's performance in tumor cell lines and oocyte samples, reaching total identification and quantification of 27,668 genes, 4,847 proteins, 1,508 PTM sites, and 680 metabolites in single mouse oocytes. We profiled previously-uncharacterized dynamic crosstalk among the entire metabolic pathways from metabolic enzyme expression and regulation to metabolite-mediated post-translational modifications during oocyte maturation. In summary, scTPPM provided an effective workflow for multi-omics co-profiling in single cells, enabling multi-layered insights into complex regulatory network.

cell biology↗

Sequence context and partner availability specify divergent cell fates from a single transcription factor

Transcription factors drive the gene regulatory networks that control developmental transitions, yet which of their many targets a cell uses remains unresolved. Expressing Cebp, Cebp{beta} or Cebp{delta} identically, alone or with Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and cMyc, gave four outcomes: adipocyte from fibroblasts and neural stem cells, trophectoderm from embryonic stem cells, and myeloid from B cells. Raising Cebp levels changed how many sites it reached, not which sequence it read: clustered motifs maintained somatic enhancers, while spillover onto low-copy sites created de novo enhancers carrying composites of Cebp and cell-type-restricted partners. In fibroblasts, Cebp also redistributed Oct4, Sox2 and Klf4 from early targets, blocking iPSC formation. Supplying the predicted partners rewrote the output: Spi1 redirected Cebp into parallel adipogenic and myeloid programs, via a transient PpargCD45 state using separate enhancers for each; TFAP2C abolished adipogenic conversion. Motif density and partner composites therefore assemble a factor's instructive output in the receiving cell.

cell biology↗