Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/060715

Plant Chimeras: the good, the bad, and the Bizzaria

Abstract

Chimeras - organisms that are composed of cells of more than one genotype - captured the human imagination long before they were formally described and used in the laboratory. These organisms owe their namesake to a fire-breathing monster from Greek mythology that has the head of a lion, the body of a goat, and the tail of a serpent. The first description of a non-fictional chimera dates back to the middle of the seventeenth century when the Florentine gardener Pietro Nati discovered an adventitious shoot growing from the graft junction between sour orange (Citrus aurantium) and citron (C. medica). This perplexing chimera that grows with sectors phenotypically resembling each of the citrus progenitors inspired discussion and wonder from the scientific community and was fittingly named the Bizzaria. Initially, the Bizzaria was believed to be an asexual hybrid that formed from a cellular fusion between the grafted parents; however, in-depth cellular analyses carried out centuries later demonstrated that the Bizzaria, along with other chimeras, owe their unique sectored appearance to a conglomeration of cells from the two donors. Since this pivotal discovery at the turn of the twentieth century, chimeras have served both as tools and as unique biological phenomena that have contributed to our understanding of plant development at the cellular, tissue, and organismal level. Rapid advancements in genome sequencing technologies have enabled the establishment of new model species with novel morphological and developmental features that enable the generation of chimeric organisms. In this review, we show that genetic mosaic and chimera studies provide a technologically simple way to delve into the organismal, genetic, and genomic inner workings underlying the development of diverse model organisms. Moreover, we discuss the unique opportunity that chimeras present to explore universal principles governing intercellular communication and the coordination of organismal biology in a heterogenomic landscape.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Margaret H Frank, Daniel H Chitwood. 2016-06-28. Plant Chimeras: the good, the bad, and the Bizzaria. https://doi.org/10.1101/060715

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Enhanced production of nitrogenase components in Nicotiana benthamiana through co-expression with Bacterioferritin A

O_LIEngineering nitrogen fixing crops requires not only transferring the nitrogenase structural genes, but also the accessory genes to synthesize its iron-sulphur cofactors. Scaffold protein NifU is a critical element in this system as the starting point of nitrogenase cofactor assembly. NifU has been successfully produced in plants, however, its optimal production required high levels of iron in the medium. This is likely due to a faulty connection with the endogenous iron trafficking network C_LIO_LITo identify specific elements targeting iron to NifU, pull-down assays were performed to identify showing bacterioferritin A (BfrA) as a likely candidate. Co-immunopurification, mutant characterization, iron transfer assays, and co-expression in Nicotiana benthamiana assays were carried out. C_LIO_LIBfrA transfers iron to NifU through protein-protein interactions. When these two proteins were co-expressed in N. benthamiana leaves, there was an increase in NifU production. In turn, it led to doubling NifH synthesis, a nitrogenase structural protein that is also required for the synthesis of the more complex nitrogenase cofactors. C_LIO_LIOur results provide a new element towards engineering nitrogen-fixing crops. They also underscore the importance of transferring the metal delivery systems when expressing metalloproteins in heterologous systems. C_LI

Plant Biology↗

Seasonal climatic impacts on orchid productivity in an urban ecosystem

Context: The global diversity hotspot in Southwest Australia has >480 orchids facing increasing threats from climate extremes, fire and habitat decline. Aims: To develop effective and consistent tools for measuring climate impacts on productivity in a diverse urban orchid community. Methods: Annual variations in flower and seed production for 17 orchids were determined using thousands of records over a decade with extreme climate variability. Key results: Rainfall deficits and temperatures in autumn, winter and spring increased substantially over 125 years. Seasonal climate anomalies reduced flowering and seed production for orchids, but this varied between species and seasons. These effects were summarised by climate response (CRI) and sensitivity (CSI) indexes. Early or late flowering species were most vulnerable to seasonal drought, but warm dry conditions promoted visually deceptive pollination. CRIs were strongly correlated with orchid pollination syndromes and flowering times. Effects on mycorrhizal fungi and pollinators were also observed. Extrapolating climate trends to 2100 predicted further impacts on orchid productivity (5-40%). Conclusions: Orchid climate responses were substantial, complex and deeply integrated with key traits such as pollination, phenology and fire responses. Implications: Research in an urban climate observatory produced a climate analysis framework potentially relevant to all orchids and other biota.

Plant Biology↗

Biuret inhibits Arabidopsis root growth through an active, reversible, and genetically tractable developmental response

Biuret, a nitrogen-rich by-product of urea and a common contaminant of urea-based fertilisers, has long been considered a passive phytotoxin, affecting plant performances. Yet its effects on root development and the existence of endogenous mechanisms of perception or tolerance remain largely uncharacterised. Here we combined physiological, developmental, genetic and transcriptomic approaches to investigate the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to biuret. Biuret inhibited primary root growth in a dose-dependent manner by reducing meristematic cell division rather than cell elongation, and concomitantly impaired shoot growth by limiting leaf expansion. This root inhibition was reversible upon biuret removal and was accompanied by increased auxin-responsive (DR5) and decreased cytokinin-responsive (TCS) outputs at the root apex, consistent with a regulated remodelling of meristem activity rather than purely cumulative damage. A forward genetic screen identified the biuret-resistant mutant bir29, which sustained root and inflorescence development under inhibitory concentrations. Using {superscript 1}N-labelled biuret, we showed that resistance occurred without any change in biuret influx or accumulation, uncoupling sensitivity from exposure. Whole-genome transcriptomics revealed that bir29 fails to execute the wild-type response, neither repressing the cell-cycle machinery nor deploying the stress-associated programme induced by biuret. Genetic characterisation linked resistance to multiple genomic loci required for full resistance. Together, the results indicate that biuret triggers an active, reversible and genetically tractable developmental response, suggesting that this xenobiotic compound is integrated into endogenous signalling networks. Significance StatementBiuret, a poorly metabolised contaminant of urea fertilisers, is generally regarded as a passive phytotoxin, yet we show that it inhibits Arabidopsis root growth through a reversible and genetically tractable developmental response, accompanied by reorganised auxin and cytokinin signalling, rather than through cumulative chemical injury. The isolation of the resistant mutant bir29 suggests that plants integrate this xenobiotic molecule into endogenous signalling networks, reframing biuret as an informative probe of root developmental regulation.

Plant Biology↗