Search bioRxivSearch

bioRxiv · 10.1101/042242

Advancing insect vector biology research: a community survey for future directions, research applications and infrastructure requirements

Abstract

BackgroundVector-borne pathogens impact public health and economies worldwide. It has long been recognized that research on arthropod vectors such as mosquitoes, ticks, sandflies and midges which transmit parasites and arboviruses to humans and economically important animals is crucial for development of new control measures that target transmission by the vector. While insecticides are an important part of this arsenal, appearance of resistance mechanisms is an increasing issue. Novel tools for genetic manipulation of vectors, use of Wolbachia endosymbiotic bacteria and other biological control mechanisms to prevent pathogen transmission have led to promising new intervention strategies. This has increased interest in vector biology and genetics as well as vector-pathogen interactions. Vector research is therefore at a crucial juncture, and strategic decisions on future research directions and research infrastructures will benefit from community input.\n\nMethodology/Principal FindingsA survey initiated by the European Horizon2020 INFRAVEC-2 consortium set out to canvass priorities in the vector biology research community and to determine key issues that should be addressed for researchers to efficiently study vectors, vector-pathogen interactions, as well as access the structures and services that allow such work to be carried out.\n\nConclusions/SignificanceWe summarize the key findings of the survey which in particular reflect priorities in European countries, and which will be of use to stakeholders that include researchers, government, and research organizations.\n\nAuthor SummaryResearch on arthropod vectors that transmit so-called arboviruses or parasites, such as mosquitoes, ticks, sandflies and midges is important for the development of control measures that target transmission of these pathogens. Important developments in this research area, for example vector genome sequencing, genome manipulation and use of transmission-blocking endosymbionts such as Wolbachia have increased interest in vector biology. As such, strategic decisions on research directions as well as research infrastructures will benefit from community input. A survey initiated by the European Horizon2020 INFRAVEC-2 consortium set out to investigate priorities in the vector biology research community as well as key issues that impact on research, and access to the structures and services that allow such studies to be carried out. Here we summarize the key findings of this survey, which in particular reflect priorities in European countries. The survey data will be of use to decision makers such as governments and research organizations, but also researchers and others in the field.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Alain Kohl, Emilie Pondeville, Esther Schnettler, Andrea Crisanti, Clelia Supparo, George K Christophides, Paul J Kersey, Gareth L Maslen, Willem Takken, Constantianus J. M. Koenraadt, Clelia F Oliva, Núria Busquets, F Xavier Abad, Anna-Bella Failloux, Elena A Levashina, Anthony J Wilson, Eva Veronesi, Maëlle Pichard, Sarah Arnaud Marsh, Frédéric Simard, Kenneth D Vernick. 2016-03-03. Advancing insect vector biology research: a community survey for future directions, research applications and infrastructure requirements. https://doi.org/10.1101/042242

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Bayesian Analysis of High Throughput Data

Duplicate or triplicate experimental replicates are commonplace in the high throughput literature. However, it has not been tested whether this is statistically defensible or not. To address this issue, we use probabilistic programming to develop a simple hierarchical model for analyzing high throughput measurement data. With the model and simulated data, we show that a small increase in replicate experiments can quantitatively improve accuracy in measurement. We also provide posterior densities for statistical parameters used in the evaluation of HT data. Finally, we provide an extensible open source implementation that ingests data structured in a simple format and produces posterior densities of estimated measurement and assay evaluation parameters.

Scientific Communication and Education

Reproducibility and replicability of rodent phenotyping in preclinical studies

The scientific community is increasingly concerned with cases of published \"discoveries\" that are not replicated in further studies. The field of mouse behavioral phenotyping was one of the first to raise this concern, and to relate it to other complicated methodological issues: the complex interaction between genotype and environment; the definitions of behavioral constructs; and the use of the mouse as a model animal for human health and disease mechanisms. In January 2015, researchers from various disciplines including genetics, behavior genetics, neuroscience, ethology, statistics and bioinformatics gathered in Tel Aviv University to discuss these issues. The general consent presented here was that the issue is prevalent and of concern, and should be addressed at the statistical, methodological and policy levels, but is not so severe as to call into question the validity and the usefulness of model organisms as a whole. Well-organized community efforts, coupled with improved data and metadata sharing, were agreed by all to have a key role to play in identifying specific problems and promoting effective solutions. As replicability is related to validity and may also affect generalizability and translation of findings, the implications of the present discussion reach far beyond the issue of replicability of mouse phenotypes but may be highly relevant throughout biomedical research.

Scientific Communication and Education

Identification of Successful Mentoring Communities using Network-based Analysis of Mentor-Mentee Relationships across Nobel Laureates

Skills underlying scientific innovation and discovery generally develop within an academic community, often beginning with a graduate mentors laboratory. In this paper, a network analysis of doctoral student-dissertation advisor relationships in The Academic Tree is used to identify successful mentoring communities in high-level science, as measured by number of Nobel laureates within the community. Nobel laureates form a distinct group in the network with greater numbers of Nobel laureate ancestors, descendants, mentees/grandmentees, and local academic family. Subnetworks composed entirely of Nobel laureates extend across as many as four generations. Successful historical mentoring communities were identified centering around Cambridge University in the latter 19th century and Columbia University in the early 20th century. The current practice of building web-based academic networks, extended to include a wider variety of measures of academic success, would allow for the identification of modern successful scientific communities and should be promoted.

Scientific Communication and Education