bioRxiv · 10.1101/008417
Proportionality: a valid alternative to correlation for relative data
Abstract
In the life sciences, many measurement methods yield only the relative abundances of different components in a sample. With such relative---or compositional---data, differential expression needs careful interpretation, and correlation---a statistical workhorse for analyzing pairwise relationships---is an inappropriate measure of association. Using yeast gene expression data we show how correlation can be misleading and present proportionality as a valid alternative for relative data. We show how the strength of proportionality between two variables can be meaningfully and interpretably described by a new statistic {varphi} which can be used instead of correlation as the basis of familiar analyses and visualization methods, including co-expression networks and clustered heatmaps. While the main aim of this study is to present proportionality as a means to analyse relative data, it also raises intriguing questions about the molecular mechanisms underlying the proportional regulation of a range of yeast genes.
Source connections
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
David Lovell, Vera Pawlowsky-Glahn, Juan José Egozcue, Samuel Marguerat, Jürg Bähler. 2014-08-25. Proportionality: a valid alternative to correlation for relative data. https://doi.org/10.1101/008417
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.