Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Neuroscience

Find bioRxiv neuroscience preprints. Search neural circuits, brain imaging and behavior in indexed metadata; check the original manuscript and its version. Preprints are not peer reviewed.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Uncertainpy: A Python toolbox for uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis in computational neuroscience.

Computational models in neuroscience typically contain many parameters that are poorly constrained by experimental data. Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis provide rigorous procedures to quantify how the model output depends on this parameter uncertainty. Unfortunately, the application of such methods is not yet standard within the field of neuroscience.\n\nHere we present Uncertainpy, an open-source Python toolbox, tailored to perform uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of neuroscience models. Uncertainpy aims to make it easy and quick to get started with uncertainty analysis, without any need for detailed prior knowledge. The toolbox allows uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis to be performed on already existing models without needing to modify the model equations or model implementation. Uncertainpy bases its analysis on polynomial chaos expansions, which are more efficient than the more standard Monte-Carlo based approaches.\n\nUncertainpy is tailored for neuroscience applications by its built-in capability for calculating characteristic features in the model output. The toolbox does not merely perform a point-to- point comparison of the \"raw\" model output (e.g. membrane voltage traces), but can also calculate the uncertainty and sensitivity of salient model response features such as spike timing, action potential width, mean interspike interval, and other features relevant for various neural and neural network models. Uncertainpy comes with several common models and features built in, and including custom models and new features is easy.\n\nThe aim of the current paper is to present Uncertainpy for the neuroscience community in a user- oriented manner. To demonstrate its broad applicability, we perform an uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis on three case studies relevant for neuroscience: the original Hodgkin-Huxley point-neuron model for action potential generation, a multi-compartmental model of a thalamic interneuron implemented in the NEURON simulator, and a sparsely connected recurrent network model implemented in the NEST simulator.\n\nSIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTA major challenge in computational neuroscience is to specify the often large number of parameters that define the neuron and neural network models. Many of these parameters have an inherent variability, and some may even be actively regulated and change with time. It is important to know how the uncertainty in model parameters affects the model predictions. To address this need we here present Uncertainpy, an open-source Python toolbox tailored to perform uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of neuroscience models.

neuroscience↗

Pain neuroscience education on YouTube: a systematic review

ObjectivesThe Internet in general, and YouTube in particular, is now one of the most popular sources of health-related information. Pain neuroscience education has become a primary tool for managing persistent pain, based in part on the discovery that information about pain can change pain. Our objective was to examine the availability, characteristics, and content of YouTube videos providing pain neuroscience education.\n\nMethodsWe conducted a systematic review of videos on YouTube using the search terms \"pain education\", \"what is pain\", and \"pain brain\" in January 2018. Videos were included if they were in English, were under 10 minutes long, and included information on the neuroscience of pain. Videos were coded for i) descriptive characteristics (e.g., number of views, duration on YouTube), ii) source and style, iii) whether or not they addressed seven pre-determined target concepts of pain neuroscience education (e.g., Pain is not an accurate marker of tissue state), and iv) how engaging they were.\n\nResultsWe found 106 unique videos that met the inclusion criteria. The videos ranged from having four views to over five million views (Mdn = 1163 views), with the three most highly viewed videos accounting for 75% of the total views. Animated videos were much more highly viewed than non-animated videos. Only a small number of videos had been posted by a clearly-identifiable reputable source such as an academic or medical research institution (10%), although a number of videos were posted by healthcare professionals and professional medical societies. For a small number of videos (7%), the source was unclear. We found 17 videos that addressed at least one target concept of pain neuroscience science education, only nine of which were considered to be engaging. The target concept Pain is a brain output was considered to be well addressed by the most videos (N = 11), followed by Pain is a protector (N = 10). We found only one video that adequately addressed all seven target concepts of pain neuroscience education.\n\nDiscussionYouTube contains a variety of videos that practitioners, patients, and families may view to access pain neuroscience education information. A small portion of these videos addressed one or more target concepts of pain neuroscience education in an engaging manner. It is yet to be determined to what extent patients are able to learn information from these videos, to what extent the videos promote behavior change, and thus to what extent the videos may be useful for clinical practice.

scientific communication and education↗

Automating literature screening and curation with applications to computational neuroscience

ObjectiveModelDB (https://modeldb.science) is a discovery platform for computational neuroscience, containing over 1800 published model codes with standardized metadata. These codes were mainly supplied from unsolicited model author submissions, but this approach is inherently limited. We estimate we have captured only around one-third of NEURON models and lower fractions for other simulators. To more completely characterize the state of computational neuroscience modeling work, we aim to identify works containing results derived from computational neuroscience approaches and their standardized associated metadata (e.g. cell types, research topics). Materials and MethodsKnown computational neuroscience work from ModelDB and identified neuroscience work queried from PubMed were included in our study. After pre-screening with SPECTER2, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 were used to identify likely computational neuroscience work and their relevant metadata. ResultsSPECTER2, GPT-4, and GPT-3.5 demonstrated varied but high abilities in identification of computational neuroscience work. GPT-4 achieved 96.9% accuracy and GPT-3.5 improved from 54.2% to 85.5% through instruction-tuning and Chain of Thought. GPT-4 also showed high potential in identifying relevant metadata annotations. DiscussionDue to computational limitations, we only used each papers title and abstract, partially leading to false negatives. Further efforts should be devoted to including more training data and further improving current LLMs through fine-tuning approaches. ConclusionNLP and LLM techniques can be added to ModelDB to facilitate further model discovery, and will contribute to a more standardized and comprehensive framework for establishing domain-specific resources.

neuroscience↗

Overcoming the Reproducibility Crisis - Results of the first Community Survey of the German National Research Data Infrastructure for Neuroscience.

The lack of reproducibility of research results is a serious problem - known as "the reproducibility crisis". The German National Research Data Infrastructure (NFDI) initiative implemented by the German Research Foundation (DFG) aims to help overcoming this crisis by developing sustainable solutions for research data management (RDM). NFDI comprises domain specific consortia across all science disciplines. In the field of neuroscience, NFDI Neuroscience (NFDI-Neuro) contributes to the strengthening of systematic and standardized RDM in its research communities. NFDI-Neuro conducted a comprehensive survey amongst the neuroscience community to determine the current needs, challenges, and opinions with respect to RDM. The outcomes of this survey are presented here. The German neuroscience community perceives barriers with respect to RDM and data sharing mainly linked to (1) lack of data and metadata standards, (2) lack of community adopted provenance tracking methods, 3) lack of a privacy preserving research infrastructure for sensitive data (4) lack of RDM literacy and (5) lack of required time and resources for proper RDM. NFDI-Neuro aims to systematically address these barriers by leading and contributing to the development of standards, tools, and infrastructure and by providing training, education, and support, as well as additional resources for RDM to its research community. The RDM work of NFDI-Neuro is conducted in close collaboration with its partner EBRAINS AISBL, the coordinating entity of the EU Flagship Human Brain Project, and its Research Infrastructure (RI) EBRAINS with more than 5000 registered users and developers from more than 70 countries of all continents. While NFDI-Neuro aims to address the German national needs, it closely aligns with the international community and the topics of the Digital Europe Program and EU Data Spaces. Significance StatementA comprehensive survey amongst the neuroscience community in Germany determined the current needs, challenges, and opinions with respect to standardized research data management (RDM) to overcome the reproducibility crisis. Significant deficits were pointed out concerning the perceived lack of standards for data and metadata, lack of provenance tracking and versioning of data, lack of protected digital research infrastructure for sensitive data and the lack of education and resources for proper RDM. Yet, at the same time, an overwhelming majority of community members indicated that they would be willing to share their data with other researchers and are interested to increase their RDM skills. Thus, the survey results suggest that training, the provision of standards, tools, infrastructure and additional resources for RDM holds the potential to significantly facilitate reproducible research in neuroscience.

neuroscience↗

Gender and geographical disparity in editorial boards of journals in psychology and neuroscience

While certain metrics of diversity have seen great improvement in recent years in academic psychology and neuroscience, unequal representation remains for many positions of power. Here, we reviewed publicly available information in order to infer the proportion of editors by gender and their country of affiliation in the top 50 journals worldwide in each of the two fields. The sample included a total of 2,864 editors for psychology journals and 3,093 editors for neuroscience journals. There was a statistically significant difference in the proportion of male and female editors in both fields, both across editorial roles, and within various role categories, including editor-in-chief and their deputies at neuroscience journals, associate and section editors in both fields, and editorial and advisory board members in both fields. The only category in which there was not a significant imbalance of male and female scholars was the editors-in-chief of psychology journals and their deputies. Geographically, USA-based academics significantly outnumbered those from other countries as editors in both psychology and neuroscience. Results also indicated that over three quarters of psychology journals (76%) were comprised of more than 50% male editors, while only 20% had a similar proportion of female editors. In neuroscience, 88% of journals were comprised of more than 50% male editors, while only 10% of journals included a similar, proportional majority of female editors. Findings suggest that editorial positions in academic journals, possibly one of the most powerful decision-making roles in academic psychology and neuroscience, are not balanced in gender or geographical representation.

scientific communication and education↗

Short Neurorobotics Workshop for High School Students Promotes Competence and Confidence in Computational Neuroscience

Understanding the brain is a fascinating challenge, captivating the scientific community and the public alike. The lack of effective treatment for most brain disorders makes the training of the next generation of neuroscientists, engineers and physicians a key concern. Over the past decade there has been a growing effort to introduce neuroscience in primary and secondary schools, however hands-on laboratories have been limited to anatomical or electrophysiological activities. Modern neuroscience research labs are increasingly using computational tools to model circuits of the brain to understand information processing. Here we introduce the use of neurorobots - robots controlled by computer models of biological brains - as an introduction to computational neuroscience in the K-12 classroom. Neurorobotics has enormous potential as an education technology because it combines multiple activities with clear educational benefits including neuroscience, active learning, and robotics. We describe an introductory neurorobot workshop that teaches high school students how to use neurorobots to investigate key concepts in neuroscience, including spiking neural networks, synaptic plasticity, and adaptive action selection. Our do-it-yourself (DIY) neurorobot uses wheels, a camera, a speaker, and a distance sensor to interact with its environment, and can be built from generic parts costing about $150 in under 4 hrs. Our Neurorobot App visualizes the neurorobot's visual input and brain activity in real-time, and enables students to design new brains and deliver dopamine-like reward signals to reinforce chosen behaviors. We have tested the Neurorobot Workshop with high school students (n = 3 workshops, 9 students total) and have found that students were able to complete all exercises in under 3 hrs. In a post-workshop survey, students reported having gained the ability to develop neural networks that perform specific functions, including goal-directed behavior and memory. Here we provide DIY hardware assembly instructions, discuss our open-source Neurorobot App and demonstrate how to teach the Neurorobot Workshop. By doing this we hope to accelerate research in educational neurorobotics and promote the use of neurorobots to teach computational neuroscience in high school.

scientific communication and education↗

Toward Reliable Network Neuroscience for Mapping Individual Differences

A rapidly emerging application of network neuroscience in neuroimaging studies has provided useful tools to understand individual differences in intrinsic brain function by mapping spontaneous brain activity, namely intrinsic functional network neuroscience (ifNN). However, the variability of methodologies applied across the ifNN studies - with respect to node definition, edge construction, and graph measurements-makes it difficult to directly compare findings and also challenging for end users to select the optimal strategies for mapping individual differences in brain networks. Here, we aim to provide a benchmark for best ifNN practices by systematically comparing the measurement reliability of individual differences under different ifNN analytical strategies using the test-retest design of the Human Connectome Project. The results uncovered four essential principles to guide ifNN studies: 1) use a whole brain parcellation to define network nodes, including subcortical and cerebellar regions, 2) construct functional networks using spontaneous brain activity in multiple slow bands, 3) optimize topological economy of networks at individual level, 4) characterise information flow with specific metrics of integration and segregation. We built an interactive online resource of reliability assessments for future ifNN (ibraindata.com/research/ifNN). AUTHOR SUMMARYIt is an essential mission for neuroscience to understand the individual differences in brain function. Graph or network theory offer novel methods of network neuroscience to address such a challenge. This article documents optimal strategies on the test-retest reliability of measuring individual differences in intrinsic brain networks of spontaneous activity. The analytical pipelines are identified to optimize for highly reliable, individualized network measurements. These pipelines optimize network metrics for high inter-individual variances and low inner-individual variances by defining network nodes with whole-brain parcellations, deriving the connectivity with spontaneous high-frequency slow-band oscillations, constructing brain graphs with topology-based methods for edge filtering, and favoring multi-level or multi-modal metrics. These psychometric findings are critical for translating the functional network neuroscience into clinical or other personalized practices requiring neuroimaging markers.

neuroscience↗

NEST Desktop - An educational application for neuroscience

Simulation software for spiking neuronal network models matured in the past decades regarding performance and flexibility. But the entry barrier remains high for students and early career scientists in computational neuroscience since these simulators typically require programming skills and a complex installation. Here, we describe an installation-free Graphical User Interface (GUI) running in the web browser, which is distinct from the simulation engine running anywhere, on the students laptop or on a supercomputer. This architecture provides robustness against technological changes in the software stack and simplifies deployment for self-education and for teachers. Our new open source tool, NEST Desktop, comprises graphical elements for creating and configuring network models, running simulations, and visualizing and analyzing the results. NEST Desktop allows students to explore important concepts in computational neuroscience without the need to learn a simulator control language before. Our experiences so far highlight that NEST Desktop helps advancing both quality and intensity of teaching in computational neuroscience in regular university courses. We view the availability of the tool on public resources like the European ICT infrastructure for neuroscience EBRAINS as a contribution to equal opportunities. Significance StatementThe graphical user interface NEST Desktop makes neuronal network simulations accessible to non-programmers. It facilitates the interactive exploration of neuronal network models by integrating the whole workflow of wiring up the setup, simulating the neuronal dynamics, and analyzing the recorded activity data into a single tool. NEST Desktop effectively supports teaching the concepts and methods of computational neuroscience. Due to its installation-free web-based implementation, it is in particularly suitable for online courses.

neuroscience↗

20 years of African Neuroscience: Waking a sleeping giant

Understanding the function and dysfunction of the brain remains one of the key challenges of our time. However, an overwhelming majority of brain research is carried out in the Global North, by a minority of well-funded and intimately interconnected labs. In contrast, with an estimated one neuroscientist per million people in Africa, news about neuroscience research from the Global South remains sparse. Clearly, devising new policies to boost Africa’s neuroscience landscape is imperative. However, the policy must be based on accurate data, which is largely lacking. Such data must reflect the extreme heterogeneity of research outputs across the continent’s 54 countries distributed over an area larger than USA, Europe and China combined. Here, we analysed all of Africa’s Neuroscience output over the past 21 years. Uniquely, we individually verified in each of 12,326 publications that the work was indeed performed in Africa and led by African-based researchers. This step is critical: previous estimates grossly inflated figures, because many of Africa’s high-visibility publications are in fact the result of internationally led collaborations, with most work done outside of Africa. The remaining number of African-led Neuroscience publications was 5,219, on average only ~5 per country and year. From here, we extracted metrics such as the journal and citations, as well as detailed information on funding, international collaborations and the techniques and model systems used. We link these metrics to demographic data and indicators of mobility and economy. For reference, we also extracted the same metrics from 220 randomly selected publications each from the UK, USA, Australia, Japan and Brazil. Our unique dataset allows us to gain accurate and in-depth information on the current state of African Neuroscience research, and to put it into a global context. This in turn allows us to make actionable recommendations on how African research might best be supported in the future.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

scientific communication and education↗

Teacher Perceptions of Using Robots to Teach Neuroscience in Secondary School

The use of robots to help teachers to engage students in STEM subjects has been increasing in recent years, and much progress has been made in K12 schools to incorporate robots in the pedagogy. Recent studies indicate that robots can play a significant role to engage students in neuroscience subjects, but little is known about teachers perceptions of using robots to teach neuroscience. In this paper, we present a study based on a survey questionnaire conducted with 84 teachers across multiple high schools in the United States to understand their perceptions about the usefulness of using robots to teach neuroscience. To situate teachers with an example of how robots can be used in neuroscience classrooms, we describe an educational tool called the SpikerBot. Our preliminary results indicate that there is an opportunity for neuroscience-oriented robots in secondary education, provided sufficient on-boarding and training videos.

scientific communication and education↗

The Mismatch Between Neuroscience Graduate Training and Professional Skill Sets

Understanding the skill sets required for career paths is a prerequisite for preparing students for those careers. Neuroscience career paths are rapidly changing as the field expands and increasingly overlaps with computational and data-heavy job sectors. With the steady growth in neuroscience trainees and the diversification of jobs for those trainees, it is important to assess whether or not our training is matching the skill sets required in the workforce. Here, we surveyed hundreds of neuroscience professionals and graduate students to assess their use and valuation of a range of skills, from bench skills to communication and management. We find that professionals with neuroscience degrees can be clustered into three main groups based on their skill sets: academic research, industry research and technical work, and non-research. Further, we find that while graduate students do not use or highly value management and communication skills, almost all neuroscience professionals report strongly needing those skills. Finally, coding and data analysis skills are widely used in academic and industry research and predict higher salaries. Our findings can help trainees assess their own skill sets as well as encourage educational leaders to offer training in management and communication-skills which may help catapult trainees into the next stages of their careers.

scientific communication and education↗

Ultraliser: a framework for creating multiscale, high-fidelity and geometrically realistic 3D models for in silico neuroscience

UO_SCPLOWLTRALISERC_SCPLOW is a neuroscience-specific software framework capable of creating accurate and biologically realistic 3D models of complex neuroscientific structures at intracellular (e.g. mitochondria and endoplasmic reticula), cellular (e.g. neurons and glia) and even multicellular scales of resolution (e.g. cerebral vasculature and minicolumns). Resulting models are exported as triangulated surface meshes and annotated volumes for multiple applications in in silico neuroscience, allowing scalable supercomputer simulations that can unravel intricate cellular structure-function relationships. UO_SCPLOWLTRALISERC_SCPLOW implements a high performance and unconditionally robust voxelization engine adapted to create optimized watertight surface meshes and annotated voxel grids from arbitrary non-watertight triangular soups, digitized morphological skeletons or binary volumetric masks. The framework represents a major leap forward in simulation-based neuroscience, making it possible to employ high-resolution 3D structural models for quantification of surface areas and volumes, which are of the utmost importance for cellular and system simulations. The power of UO_SCPLOWLTRALISERC_SCPLOW is demonstrated with several use cases in which hundreds of models are created for potential application in diverse types of simulations. UO_SCPLOWLTRALISERC_SCPLOW is publicly released under the GNU GPL3 license on GitHub (BlueBrain/Ultraliser). SignificanceThere is crystal clear evidence on the impact of cell shape on its signaling mechanisms. Structural models can therefore be insightful to realize the function; the more realistic the structure can be, the further we get insights into the function. Creating realistic structural models from existing ones is challenging, particularly when needed for detailed subcellular simulations. We present UO_SCPLOWLTRALISERC_SCPLOW, a neuroscience-dedicated framework capable of building these structural models with realistic and detailed cellular geometries that can be used for simulations. Key pointsO_LIUltraliser creates spatial models of neuro-glia-vascular (NGV) structures with realistic geometries. C_LIO_LIUltraliser creates high fidelity watertight manifolds and large scale volumes from centerline descriptions, non-watertight surfaces, and binary masks. C_LIO_LIResulting models enable scalable in silico experiments that can probe intricate structure-function relationships. C_LIO_LIThe framework is unrivalled both in ease-of-use and in the accuracy of resulting geometry representing a major leap forward in simulation-based neuroscience. C_LI

bioinformatics↗

Is there a problem with methods skills in cognitive neuroscience? Evidence from an online survey.

Cognitive neuroscience increasingly relies on complex data analysis methods. Researchers in this field come from highly diverse scientific backgrounds, such as psychology, engineering and medicine. This poses challenges with respect to acquisition of appropriate scientific computing and data analysis skills, as well as communication among researchers with different knowledge and skills sets. Are researchers in cognitive neuroscience adequately equipped to address these challenges? Here, we present evidence from an online survey of methods skills. Respondents (n=305) mainly comprised students and post-doctoral researchers working in the cognitive neurosciences. Multiple choice questions addressed a variety of basic and fundamental aspects of neuroimaging data analysis, such as signal analysis, linear algebra, and statistics. We analysed performance with respect to the following factors: undergraduate degree (grouped into Psychology, Methods, Biology), current researcher status (undergraduate student, PhD student, post-doctoral researcher), gender, and self-rated expertise levels. Overall accuracy was 72%. Not surprisingly, the Methods group performed best (87%), followed by Biology (73%) and Psychology (66%). Accuracy increased from undergraduate (59%) to PhD (74%) level, but not from PhD to post-doctoral (74%) level. The difference in performance for the Methods versus non-methods (Psychology/Biology) groups was particularly striking for questions related to signal analysis and linear algebra, two areas especially relevant to neuroimaging research. Self-rated methods expertise was not strongly predictive of performance. The majority of respondents (93%) indicated they would like to receive at least some additional training on the topics covered in this survey. In conclusion, methods skills among junior researchers in cognitive neuroscience can be improved, researchers are aware of this, and there is strong demand for more skills-oriented training opportunities. We hope that this survey will provide an empirical basis for the development of bespoke skills-oriented training programmes in cognitive neuroscience institutions.

scientific communication and education↗

NDI: A platform-independent data interface and database for neuroscience physiology and imaging experiments

Collaboration in neuroscience is impeded by the difficulty of sharing primary data, results, and software across labs. Here we introduce Neuroscience Data Interface (NDI), a platform-independent standard that allows an analyst to use and create software that functions independently from the format of the raw data or the manner in which the data is organized into files. The interface is rooted in a simple vocabulary that describes common apparatus and storage devices used in neuroscience experiments. Results of analyses - and analyses of analyses - are stored as documents in a scalable, queryable database that stores the relationships and history among the experiment elements and documents. The interface allows the development of an application ecosystem where applications can focus on calculation rather than data format or organization. This tool can be used by individual labs to exchange and analyze data, and it can serve to curate neuroscience data for searchable archives.

neuroscience↗

NeuroML-DB: Sharing and characterizing data-driven neuroscience models described in NeuroML

As researchers develop computational models of neural systems with increasing sophistication and scale, it is often the case that fully de novo model development is impractical and inefficient. Thus arises a critical need to quickly find, evaluate, re-use, and build upon models and model components developed by other researchers. We introduce the NeuroML Database (NeuroML-DB.org), which has been developed to address this need and to complement other model sharing resources. NeuroML-DB stores over 1,500 previously published models of ion channels, cells, and networks that have been translated to the modular NeuroML model description language. The database also provides reciprocal links to other neuroscience model databases (ModelDB, Open Source Brain) as well as access to the original model publications (PubMed). These links along with Neuroscience Information Framework (NIF) search functionality provide deep integration with other neuroscience community modeling resources and greatly facilitate the task of finding suitable models for reuse. Serving as an intermediate language, NeuroML and its tooling ecosystem enable efficient translation of models to other popular simulator formats. The modular nature also enables efficient analysis of a large number of models and inspection of their properties. Search capabilities of the database, together with web-based, programmable online interfaces, allow the community of researchers to rapidly assess stored model electrophysiology, morphology, and computational complexity properties. We use these capabilities to perform a database-scale analysis of neuron and ion channel models and describe a novel tetrahedral structure formed by cell model clusters in the space of model properties and features. Author SummaryComputational models of neurons and their circuits are increasingly used by neuroscience researchers as a tool to probe fundamental aspects of brain function. Here we describe a database of computational models of neurons and networks that makes it easier to evaluate and reuse these models. The models in the database are available in a standard format, called NeuroML, that makes it easier to extend and reuse the models in simulation studies using a wide range of simulation software platforms. The use of this standard format also makes it easier to characterize models in an automated way and analyze relationships across the features of simulated data from model simulations. Striking Image O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/459920v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (75K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4be5adorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d3f138org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@81b8e2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9127bf_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

neuroscience↗

No Free Lunch from Deep Learning in Neuroscience: A Case Study through Models of the Entorhinal-Hippocampal Circuit

Research in Neuroscience, as in many scientific disciplines, is undergoing a renaissance based on deep learning. Unique to Neuroscience, deep learning models can be used not only as a tool but interpreted as models of the brain. The central claims of recent deep learning-based models of brain circuits are that they make novel predictions about neural phenomena or shed light on the fundamental functions being optimized. We show, through the case-study of grid cells in the entorhinal-hippocampal circuit, that one may get neither. We begin by reviewing the principles of grid cell mechanism and function obtained from first-principles modeling efforts, then rigorously examine the claims of deep learning models of grid cells. Using large-scale architectural and hyperparameter sweeps and theory-driven experimentation, we demonstrate that the results of such models may be more strongly driven by particular, non-fundamental, and post-hoc implementation choices than fundamental truths about neural circuits or the loss function(s) they might optimize. We discuss why these models cannot be expected to produce accurate models of the brain without the addition of substantial amounts of inductive bias, an informal No Free Lunch result for Neuroscience. Based on first principles work, we provide hypotheses for what additional loss functions will produce grid cells more robustly. In conclusion, circumspection and transparency, together with biological knowledge, are warranted in building and interpreting deep learning models in Neuroscience.

neuroscience↗

Trends in self-citation rates in neuroscience literature

Citation metrics influence academic reputation and career trajectories. Recent works have highlighted flaws in citation practices in the Neurosciences, such as the under-citation of women. However, self-citation rates--or how much authors cite themselves--have not yet been comprehensively investigated in the Neurosciences. This work characterizes self-citation rates in basic, translational, and clinical Neuroscience literature by collating 100,347 articles from 63 journals between the years 2000-2020. In analyzing over five million citations, we demonstrate four key findings: 1) increasing self-citation rates of Last Authors relative to First Authors, 2) lower self-citation rates in low- and middle-income countries, 3) gender differences in self-citation stemming from differences in the number of previously published papers, and 4) variations in self-citation rates by field. Our characterization of self-citation provides insight into citation practices that shape the perceived influence of authors in the Neurosciences, which in turn may impact what type of scientific research is done and who gets the opportunity to do it.

neuroscience↗

Designing optimal perturbation inputs for system identification in neuroscience

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWInvestigating the dynamics of neural networks, which are governed by connectivity between neurons, is a fundamental challenge in neuroscience. Because passive (spontaneous) activity provides only limited information for estimating connectivity, perturbation-based approaches are widely applied in neuroscience, as they can evoke underlying hidden dynamics. However, the characteristics of such perturbations have typically been designed based on empirical or biological intuition. To enable more accurate estimation of connectivity, we propose a data-driven and theoretically grounded framework for optimally designing perturbation inputs, based on formulating the neural model as a control system. The core theoretical insight underlying our approach is that neural signals observed in the passive state lack sufficient latent information, which leads to failures in the system identification. Perturbations reveal these hidden dynamics and lead to improved estimation. Guided by these insights, we derive a theoretical basis for optimizing perturbation inputs that minimize estimation errors in neural system identification. Building upon this, we further explore the relationship of this theory with stimulation patterns commonly used in neuroscience, such as frequency, impulse, and step inputs. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this framework for neuroscience through simulations grounded in experimental paradigms such as neural state classification and optimal control of neural states. Our theoretical analysis, together with multiple simulations, consistently shows that perturbations designed according to our framework achieve substantially more accurate system identification compared to the conventional, intuition-based inputs. This study provides a theoretical foundation for designing perturbation inputs to achieve accurate estimation of neural dynamics. This, in turn, enables reliable discrimination of neural states such as levels of consciousness and pathological conditions, and facilitates precise control of their transitions toward recovery from abnormal states.

neuroscience↗