Biology subjects

van der Wee, N.

Publications and source records attributed to van der Wee, N..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Image-Based Meta- and Mega-Analysis (IBMMA): A Unified Framework for Large-Scale, Multi-Site, Neuroimaging Data Analysis

The increasing scale and complexity of neuroimaging datasets aggregated from multiple study sites present substantial analytic challenges, as existing statistical analysis tools struggle to handle missing voxel-data, suffer from limited computational speed and inefficient memory allocation, and are restricted in the types of statistical designs they are able to model. We introduce Image-Based Meta- & Mega-Analysis (IBMMA), a novel software package implemented in R and Python that provides a unified framework for analyzing diverse neuroimaging features, efficiently handles large-scale datasets through parallel processing, offers flexible statistical modeling options, and properly manages missing voxel-data commonly encountered in multi-site studies. IBMMA produced stronger effect sizes and revealed findings in brain regions that traditional software overlooked due to missing voxel-data resulting in gaps in brain coverage. IBMMA has the potential to accelerate discoveries in neuroscience and enhance the clinical utility of neuroimaging findings.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Social dysfunction relates to altered default mode network functional integrity across neuropsychiatric disorders: A replication and generalization study

BackgroundSocial dysfunction is an early manifestation of neuropsychiatric disorders that may relate to altered Default Mode Network (DMN) integrity. This study aimed to replicate previous findings linking social dysfunction with diminished resting-state DMN functional connectivity and altered task-based DMN functional activation in response to emotional faces across schizophrenia (SZ), Alzheimers disease (AD), and healthy controls (HC), and to extend these findings to major depressive disorder (MDD). MethodsResting-state fMRI and task-based fMRI data on implicit facial emotional processing were acquired in an overlapping cohort (resting-state fMRI: N=167; SZ=32, MDD=44, AD=29, HC=62. Task-based fMRI: N=152; SZ=30, MDD=42, AD=26, HC=54). Additionally, mega-analyses (N=317 for resting-state fMRI; N=291 for task-based fMRI) of the current and a prior independent sample were conducted. Social dysfunction was indexed with the Social Functioning Scale (SFS) and the De Jong-Gierveld Loneliness (LON) scale. ResultsThe association between higher mean SFS+LON social dysfunction scores and diminished DMN connectivity within the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex across SZ/AD/HC participants was replicated, and extended to MDD patients. Similar observations within the dorsomedial and rostromedial prefrontal cortex were found in the mega-analysis. Associations between social dysfunction and DMN activation in response to sad and happy faces were not replicated or found in the mega-analysis. ConclusionsDiminished dorsomedial prefrontal cortex DMN connectivity emerged as a transdiagnostic neurobiological marker for social dysfunction, suggesting a potential treatment target for precision medicine approaches. DMN functional responses to emotional faces may not be a sensitive biomarker for social dysfunction.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Genetic underpinnings of sociability in the UK Biobank

Difficulties with sociability include a tendency to avoid social contacts and activities, and to prefer being alone rather than being with others. While sociability is a continuously distributed trait in the population, decreased sociability represent a common early manifestation of multiple neuropsychiatric disorders such as Schizophrenia (SCZ), Bipolar Disorder (BP), Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASDs), and Alzheimers disease (AD). We aimed to investigate the genetic underpinnings of sociability as a continuous trait in the general population. In this respect, we performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) using a sociability score based on 4 social functioning-related self-report questions in the UK Biobank sample (n=342,461) to test the effect of individual genetic variants. This was followed by LD score analyses to investigate the genetic correlation with psychiatric disorders (SCZ, BP, MDD, ASDs) and a neurological disorder (AD) as well as related phenotypes (Loneliness and Social Anxiety). The phenotypic data indeed showed that the sociability score was decreased in individuals with ASD, (probable) MDD, BP and SCZ, but not in individuals with AD. Our GWAS showed 604 genome-wide significant SNPs, coming from 18 independent loci (SNP-based h2=0.06). Genetic correlation analyses showed significant correlations with SCZ (rg=0.15, p=9.8e-23), MDD (rg=0.68, p=6.6e-248) and ASDs (rg=0.27, p=4.5e-28), but no correlation with BP (rg=0.01, p=0.45) or AD (rg=0.04, p=0.55). Our sociability trait was also genetically correlated with Loneliness (rg=0.45, p=2.4e-8) and Social Anxiety (rg=0.48, p=0.002). Our study shows that there is a significant genetic component to variation in population levels of sociability, which is relevant to some psychiatric disorders (SCZ, MDD, ASDs), but not to BP and AD.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Evaluating the evidence for biotypes of depression: attempted replication of Drysdale et.al. 2017

BackgroundPsychiatric disorders are highly heterogeneous, defined based on symptoms with little connection to potential underlying biological mechanisms. A possible approach to dissect biological heterogeneity is to look for biologically meaningful subtypes. A recent study Drysdale et al. (2017) showed promising results along this line by simultaneously using resting state fMRI and clinical data and identified four distinct subtypes of depression with different clinical profiles and abnormal resting state fMRI connectivity. These subtypes were predictive of treatment response to transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy.\n\nObjectiveHere, we attempted to replicate the procedure followed in the Drysdale et al. study and their findings in an independent dataset of a clinically more heterogeneous sample of 187 participants with depression and anxiety. We aimed to answer the following questions: 1) Using the same procedure, can we find a statistically significant and reliable relationship between brain connectivity and clinical symptoms? 2) Is the observed relationship similar to the one found in the original study? 3) Can we identify distinct and reliable subtypes? 4) Do they have similar clinical profiles as the subtypes identified in the original study?\n\nMethodsWe followed the original procedure as closely as possible, including a canonical correlation analysis to find a low dimensional representation of clinically relevant resting state fMRI features, followed by hierarchical clustering to identify subtypes. We extended the original procedure using additional statistical tests, to test the statistical significance of the relationship between resting state fMRI and clinical data, and the existence of distinct subtypes. Furthermore, we examined the stability of the whole procedure using resampling.\n\nResults and ConclusionWe were not able to replicate the findings of the original study. Relationships between brain connectivity and clinical symptoms were not statistically significant and we also did not find clearly distinct subtypes of depression. We argue, that based on our rigorous approach and in-depth review of the original results, that the evidence for the existence of the distinct resting state connectivity based subtypes of depression is weak and should be interpreted with caution.

neuroscience↗