Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

van der Vliet, W.

Publications and source records attributed to van der Vliet, W..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Supervised Domain Adaptation Mitigates Cross-Ethnicity Prediction Error in Neuroimaging Based Cognitive Prediction

Machine learning models are increasingly used to predict cognitive and clinical outcomes from neuroimaging data, yet challenges in fairness and generalizability remain. Large scale datasets are often racially and ethnically imbalanced, leading to systematic performance disparities, with models typically achieving higher accuracy for majority populations represented in the training data. In this study, we evaluated whether supervised domain adaptation methods including balanced weighting, two-stage TrAdaBoost, feature augmentation with SrcOnly prediction, and linear interpolation can mitigate these biases. Using the ABCD dataset, we assessed whether models trained on 80 MRI measures from White American participants could generalize more effectively to African American participants. All domain adaptation methods reduced prediction error for African American participants, particularly for MRI modalities with large baseline disparities (e.g., structural MRI), while offering limited improvements where initial gaps were smaller (e.g., functional connectivity). Among the approaches, balanced weighting performed best and remained stable and beneficial even when only 10 African American participants were used to adapt the original model trained exclusively on White American participants. These findings suggest that simple, low-cost strategies can effectively reduce cross-ethnic performance gaps and improve equity in predictive neuroimaging, offering a practical path forward for future neuroimaging predictive biomarkers.

neuroscience↗

Multimodal MRI-based neuromarkers trace longitudinal changes in cognitive functioning in ADHD

The National Institute of Mental Healths Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework conceptualises cognition as a core functional domain for psychopathology that should be studied across multiple units of analysis and developmental timescales. In ADHD, however, it remains unclear whether neuroimaging-derived markers can not only predict inter-individual differences in cognition but also track longitudinal cognitive development and capture cognition-psychopathology relationships. Using the longitudinal Oregon ADHD-1000 study (n = 594 participants; 1,053 observations), we developed multimodal machine-learning markers of general cognitive functioning (g) from structural and resting-state functional MRI. The multimodal marker achieved an out-of-sample correlation of r = .46 and generalised similarly across children with and without ADHD. The marker explained 25.01% of interindividual variance (r = .48) and 18.82% of intraindividual variance (r = .52) in cognitive functioning. Commonality analyses showed that it captured 60.87% of intraindividual age-related cognitive variation (5.18% of the total variance in g). The marker also accounted for substantial portions of the cognition-hyperactivity association (58.79%; 6.39% of total variance in g) and the cognition-inattention association (25.99%; 4.13% of total variance in g). These findings provide evidence that multimodal structural and functional MRI can generate RDoC-informed markers that predict cognitive functioning, track cognitive development over time, and capture meaningful links between cognition and ADHD symptoms. Although predictive performance remains below levels required for clinical application, the results establish a foundation for longitudinal, RDoC-inspired investigations of cognitive development in ADHD.

neuroscience↗

When Brain Models Are not Universal: Benchmarking of Ethnic Bias in MRI-Based Cognitive Prediction Across Modalities

Predictive neuroimaging models promise precision medicine but risk exacerbating health inequities if they perform unevenly across ethnic/racial groups. Using the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development data, we benchmarked ethnic/racial bias in models predicting cognitive functioning from 91 MRI phenotypes across four training strategies. Models trained on one ethnicity performed best within that group. Models trained on participants sampled without regard to ethnicity, a common practice, performed better on White participants, likely because the ABCD sample was predominantly White. Training on equal-sized White and African American subsamples reduced disparities without accuracy loss, emerging as the upper bound for both accuracy and fairness. Structural MRI exhibited the greatest bias, whereas task-based fMRI phenotypes were more equitable. Stronger brain-cognition associations generalized more equitably, but multimodal stacking--despite enhancing prediction--did not improve fairness. Increasing representation of African American participants improved performance up to balanced sampling, with diminishing returns beyond. This first modality-wide benchmark reveals pervasive, modality-dependent ethnic bias in cognitive prediction and identifies key factors shaping equity in neuroimaging models.

neuroscience↗

Improving Predictability, Test-Retest Reliability and Generalisability of Brain-Wide Associations for Cognitive Abilities via Multimodal Stacking

Brain-wide association studies (BWASs) have attempted to relate cognitive abilities with brain phenotypes, but have been challenged by issues such as predictability, test-retest reliability, and cross-cohort generalisability. To tackle these challenges, we proposed a machine-learning "stacking" approach that draws information from whole-brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) across different modalities, from task-fMRI contrasts and functional connectivity during tasks and rest to structural measures, into one prediction model. We benchmarked the benefits of stacking, using the Human Connectome Projects: Young Adults (n=873, 22-35 years old) and Human Connectome Projects-Aging (n=504, 35-100 years old) and the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study (Dunedin Study, n=754, 45 years old). For predictability, stacked models led to out-of-sample r[~].5-.6 when predicting cognitive abilities at the time of scanning, primarily driven by task-fMRI contrasts. Notably, using the Dunedin Study, we were able to predict participants cognitive abilities at ages 7, 9, and 11 using their multimodal MRI at age 45, with an out-of-sample r of 0.52. For test-retest reliability, stacked models reached an excellent level of reliability (ICC>.75), even when we stacked only task-fMRI contrasts together. For generalisability, a stacked model with non-task MRI built from one dataset significantly predicted cognitive abilities in other datasets. Altogether, stacking is a viable approach to undertake the three challenges of BWAS for cognitive abilities. Significance statementScientists have had limited success in predicting cognitive abilities from brain MRI. We proposed a machine learning method, called stacking, to draw information across different types of brain MRI. Using three large databases (n=2,131, 22-100 years old), we found stacking to make the prediction of cognitive abilities 1) closer to actual cognitive scores when applied to a new individual, not part of the modelling process, 2) reliable over times and 3) applicable to the data collected from different age groups and MRI scanners. Indeed, stacking, especially with fMRI task contrasts, allowed us to use MRI of people aged 45 to predict their childhood cognitive abilities reasonably well. Accordingly, stacking may help MRI realise its potential to predict cognitive abilities.

neuroscience↗