Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

van der Hooft, J. J.

Publications and source records attributed to van der Hooft, J. J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Spec2Vec: Improved mass spectral similarity scoring through learning of structural relationships

Spectral similarity is used as a proxy for structural similarity in many tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) based metabolomics analyses such as library matching and molecular networking. Although weaknesses in the relationship between spectral similarity scores and the true structural similarities have been described, little development of alternative scores has been undertaken. Here, we introduce Spec2Vec, a novel spectral similarity score inspired by a natural language processing algorithm -- Word2Vec. Spec2Vec learns fragmental relationships within a large set of spectral data to derive abstract spectral embeddings that can be used to assess spectral similarities. Using data derived from GNPS MS/MS libraries including spectra for nearly 13,000 unique molecules, we show how Spec2Vec scores correlate better with structural similarity than cosine-based scores. We demonstrate the advantages of Spec2Vec in library matching and molecular networking. Spec2Vec is computationally more scalable allowing structural analogue searches in large databases within seconds.

bioinformatics↗

matchms - processing and similarity evaluation of mass spectrometry data

Mass spectrometry data is at the heart of numerable applications in the biomedical and life sciences. With growing use of high throughput techniques researchers need to analyse larger and more complex datasets. In particular through joint effort in the research community, fragmentation mass spectrometry datasets are growing in size and number. Platforms such as MassBank (Horai et al. 2010), GNPS (Wang et al. 2016) or MetaboLights (Haug et al. 2020) serve as an open-access hub for sharing of raw, processed, or annotated fragmentation mass spectrometry data (MS/MS). Without suitable tools, however, exploitation of such datasets remains overly challenging. In particular, large collected datasets contain data aquired using different instruments and measurement conditions, and can further contain a significant fraction of inconsistent, wrongly labeled, or incorrect metadata (annotations).

bioinformatics↗