Biology subjects

van Werven, F.

Publications and source records attributed to van Werven, F..

10 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Co-option of a mouse-specific retrotransposon rewires Ash2l isoform usage to prime developmental promoters

How pluripotent stem cells pre-configure the chromatin landscape to enable timely activation of developmental gene programs remains a central question in developmental biology. Here we demonstrate that the core chromatin regulator ASH2L undergoes a developmentally regulated transcription start site (TSS) switch that generates two protein isoforms with distinct developmental functions: a full-length ASH2L containing an N-terminal intrinsically disordered region (IDR), and a conserved, truncated protein isoform lacking this region. In mouse pluripotent stem cells, a lineage-specific ERV-K retrotransposon drives the upstream TSS, which suppresses the downstream TSS through transcription-coupled SETD2-mediated histone H3 lysine 36 methylation. The resulting stem cell-specific truncated ASH2L assembles into COMPASS complexes and enhances histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation at promoters governing early development. Despite being restricted to pluripotent stem cells, truncated ASH2L is required for proper axial patterning in gastruloids and for the transition of neural progenitors to motor neurons. This temporal decoupling, wherein a chromatin state established during pluripotency executes its function only after the establishing isoform disappears, defines an epigenetic priming mechanism for developmental timing. Thus, lineage-specific retrotransposon co-option reveals how a dedicated protein isoform configures the pluripotent epigenome for developmental transitions after its own expression has ceased.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2025

Mapping and quantifying nascent transcript start sites using TT-TSS-seq

Transcription initiation is a highly dynamic and tightly regulated process involving the coordinated action of transcription factors, chromatin remodelers, and RNA polymerase which determine where and when transcription begins. Accurately mapping and quantifying transcription start sites (TSSs) from nascently transcribed RNAs remains a key area of interest, as it provides critical insights into transcription dynamics. Here, we combined transient transcriptome sequencing with transcription start site sequencing (TT-TSS-seq) to accurately map and quantify transcription initiation sites from nascent transcripts. Since transient metabolic labelling yields low-input RNA, we optimized the TSS-seq protocol to enhance sensitivity and accuracy. Specifically, we refined enzymatic reactions for decapping and RNA ligation and incorporated 5 oligonucleotides containing unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) and barcodes to enable accurate quantification and sample multiplexing. The TT-TSS-seq approach detected transcription initiation of unstable transcripts, such as enhancer RNAs. Moreover, we identified that a large fraction of genes use multiple transcription initiation sites, yet often produce only a single stable transcript. Overall, TT-TSS-seq provides precise mapping and quantification of transcription initiation sites, offering new insights into transcriptional dynamics and expanding the toolkit for studying gene regulation.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2025

DNA supercoiling impacts alternative transcription start site selection in yeast

Most genes are transcribed from multiple transcription start sites (TSSs), defined as alternative TSSs, which are highly regulated and can lead to various gene regulatory outcomes including changes in translation efficiency and protein isoform expression. Transcription factors and chromatin regulators control alternative TSS selection. DNA supercoiling affects multiple aspects of transcription including transcription initiation; however, its regulatory effect on genes with multiple TSSs is not known. Here, we investigated how DNA supercoiling impacts alternative TSS usage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We depleted topoisomerases during early meiosis, where alternative TSS usage is prevalent, and applied an improved TSS sequencing protocol. We show that supercoiling affects alternative TSS usage at almost 600 genes. Increased alternative and aberrant TSS usage was observed near and within open reading frames, likely resulting from transcription-induced supercoiling originating from upstream alternative TSSs. DNA supercoiling had the greatest impact on genes with a dominant alternative TSS, significant spacing between alternative TSSs, and greater overall gene length. Our results establish that DNA supercoiling release during transcription is critical for correct TSS selection.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2023

The yeast RNA methylation complex consists of conserved yet reconfigured components with m6A-dependent and independent roles

N6-methyladenosine (m6A), the most abundant mRNA modification, is deposited in mammals/insects/plants by m6A methyltransferase complexes (MTC) comprising a catalytic subunit and at least five additional proteins. The yeast MTC is critical for meiosis and was known to comprise three proteins, of which two were conserved. We uncover three novel MTC components (Kar4/Ygl036w-Vir1/Dyn2). All MTC subunits, except for Dyn2, are essential for m6A deposition and have corresponding mammalian MTC orthologs. Unlike the mammalian bipartite MTC, the yeast MTC is unipartite, yet multifunctional. The mRNA interacting module, comprising Ime4, Mum2, Vir1, and Kar4, exerts the MTCs m6A-independent function, while Slz1 enables the MTC catalytic function in m6A deposition. Both functions are critical for meiotic progression. Kar4 also has a mechanistically separate role from the MTC during mating. The yeast MTC constituents play distinguishable m6A-dependent, MTC-dependent and MTC-independent functions, highlighting their complexity and paving the path towards dissecting multi-layered MTC functions in mammals.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2022

m6A-ELISA, a simple method for quantifying N6-methyladenosine from mRNA populations

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is a widely studied and abundant RNA modification. The m6A mark regulates the fate of RNAs in various ways, which in turn, drives changes in cell physiology, development, and disease pathology. Over the last decade, numerous methods have been developed to map and quantify m6A sites genomewide through deep sequencing. Alternatively, m6A levels can be quantified from a population of RNAs using techniques such as liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry or thin layer chromatography. However, many methods for quantifying m6A levels involve extensive protocols and specialized data analysis, and often only a few samples can be handled in a single experiment. Here, we developed a simple method for determining m6A levels in mRNA populations from various sources based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent-based assay (m6A-ELISA). We have optimized various steps of m6A-ELISA such as sample preparation and the background signal resulting from the primary antibody. We validated the method using mRNA populations from budding yeast and mouse embryonic stem cells. The full protocol takes less than a day, requiring only 25 ng of mRNA. The m6A-ELISA protocol is therefore quick, cost-effective, and scalable, making it a valuable tool for determining relative m6A levels in samples from various sources that could be adapted to detect other mRNA modifications.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2022

m6A reader Pho92 is recruited co-transcriptionally and couples translation efficacy to mRNA decay to promote meiotic fitness in yeast

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA modification impacts mRNA fate primarily via reader proteins, which dictate processes in development, stress, and disease. Yet little is known about m6A function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which occurs solely during early meiosis. Here we perform a multifaceted analysis of the m6A reader protein Pho92/Mrb1. Cross-linking immunoprecipitation analysis reveals that Pho92 associates with the 3end of meiotic mRNAs in both an m6A-dependent and independent manner. Within cells, Pho92 transitions from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, and associates with translating ribosomes. In the nucleus Pho92 associates with target loci through its interaction with transcriptional elongator Paf1C. Functionally, we show that Pho92 promotes and links protein synthesis to mRNA decay. As such, the Pho92-mediated m6A-mRNA decay is contingent on active translation and the CCR4-NOT complex. We propose that the m6A reader Pho92 is loaded co-transcriptionally to facilitate protein synthesis and subsequent decay of m6A modified transcripts, and thereby promotes meiosis.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2021

RSC-mediated nucleosome positioning and GRFs form barriers in promoters to limit divergent noncoding transcription

The directionality of gene promoters - the ratio of protein-coding over divergent noncoding transcription - is highly variable and regulated. How promoter directionality is controlled remains poorly understood. Here, we show that the chromatin remodelling complex RSC and general regulatory factors (GRFs) dictate promoter directionality by attenuating divergent transcription. At gene promoters that are highly directional, depletion of RSC leads to a relative increase in divergent noncoding transcription and thus a decrease in promoter directionality. We find that RSC facilitates nucleosome positioning upstream in promoters at the sites of divergent transcription. These highly directional promoters are also enriched for the binding of GRFs such as Reb1 and Abf1. Ectopic targeting of divergent transcription initiation sites with GRFs or the dCas9 protein suppresses divergent transcription. Our data suggest that RSC and GRFs play a pervasive role in limiting divergent transcription. We propose that any DNA binding factor, when stably associated with cryptic transcription start sites, form barriers for repressing divergent transcription. Our study provides an explanation as to why certain promoters are more directional than others.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Regulated repression, and not activation, governs the cell fate promoter controlling yeast meiosis

Intrinsic signals and cues from the external environment drive cell fate decisions. In budding yeast, the decision to enter meiosis is controlled by nutrient and mating-type signals that regulate expression of the master transcription factor for meiotic entry, IME1. How nutrient signals control IME1 expression remains poorly understood. Here we show that IME1 transcription is regulated by multiple sequence-specific transcription factors that mediate association of Tup1-Cyc8 co-repressor to its promoter. We find that at least eight transcription factors bind the IME1 promoter when nutrients are ample. Remarkably, association of these transcription factors is highly regulated by different nutrient cues. Mutant cells lacking three transcription factors (Sok2/Phd1/Yap6) displayed reduced Tup1-Cyc8 association, increased IME1 expression and earlier onset of meiosis. Our data demonstrate that the promoter of a master regulator is primed for rapid activation while repression by multiple transcription factors mediating Tup1-Cyc8 recruitment dictates the fate decision to enter meiosis.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Transcription levels of a long noncoding RNA orchestrate opposing regulatory and cell fate outcomes in yeast

Many long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) act in cis through transcription-coupled chromatin alterations that drive changes in local gene expression. How some cis-acting lncRNAs promote and others repress gene expression remains poorly understood. Here we report that in S. cerevisiae transcription levels of the lncRNA IRT2, located upstream in the promoter of the inducer of meiosis gene, regulate opposing chromatin and transcription states. Low IRT2 transcription displays enhancer RNA-like features. At these levels, IRT2 promotes histone exchange delivering acetylated histone H3 lysine 56 to chromatin thereby facilitating recruitment of a transcription factor and consequently activating transcription. Conversely, increasing IRT2 transcription enhances chromatin assembly and transcriptional repression. The opposing functions of IRT2 direct a regulatory circuit, which ensures that cells expressing opposite, but not one of either, mating-type loci enter meiosis. Our data demonstrate that the transcription levels of an lncRNA are key to controlling gene expression and cell fate outcomes.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2019

Integrated Genomic Analysis Reveals Key Features of Long Undecoded Transcript Isoform (LUTI)-based Gene Repression

Long Undecoded Transcript Isoforms (LUTIs) represent a class of non-canonical mRNAs that downregulate gene expression through the combined act of transcriptional and translational repression. While single gene studies revealed some important aspects of LUTI-based repression, how these features impact gene regulation at a global scale is unknown. By using transcript leader and direct RNA sequencing, here we identify 74 LUTI candidates that are expressed specifically during meiotic prophase. Translational repression of these candidates is ubiquitous and dependent on upstream open reading frames. However, LUTI-based transcriptional repression is highly variable. In only 50% of the cases, LUTI transcription causes downregulation of the protein-coding transcript isoform. Higher LUTI expression, enrichment of histone 3 lysine 36 trimethylation, and changes in nucleosome position are the strongest predictors of LUTI-based transcriptional repression. We conclude that LUTIs downregulate gene expression in a manner that integrates translational repression, chromatin state changes, and the magnitude of LUTI expression.

molecular biology↗