Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

van Tol, M.-J.

Publications and source records attributed to van Tol, M.-J..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Major depressive disorder recurrence and medication status shape brain network topology

Introduction: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent and disabling psychiatric disorder. Human neuroimaging studies increasingly frame its neurobiological substrate in terms of alterations of large-scale brain network organization. Resting-state fMRI findings broadly align with this view, yet remaining highly heterogeneous, reflecting both clinical and analytic variability. Predominant approaches largely characterize functional organization in terms of pairwise relationships between regions, which may limit the ability to capture more global features of brain organization associated with depression and its course. Here we use novel methods from Topological Data Analysis to provide new perspectives on these brain-behavior associations Objectives: The main objective of this study was to determine whether whole-brain topological descriptors of functional connectivity capture alterations associated with MDD. In particular, we examined whether these features vary along clinically relevant dimensions of heterogeneity, focusing on illness course (single-episode vs. recurrent MDD) and current antidepressant medication status. To this end, we analyzed the area under the curve (AUC) of the zeroth and first Betti numbers (B and B), which index global network integration and higher-order cycle structure across scales, respectively. Methods: Neuroimaging (resting state fMRI) and phenotypic data were obtained from 1,490 participants (776 individuals with MDD and 714 never-depressed controls) included in the REST-meta-MDD project of the DIRECT consortium. Functional connectivity matrices were computed using Pearson correlations between regions defined by the Power-264 atlas and harmonized across sites using CovBat. Topological Data Analysis was applied to characterize whole-brain network organization across connectivity thresholds using B and B curves and their areas under the curve (AUC). B associated cycle counts and their coarse anatomical configurations were further examined. Group differences and effects of illness course and medication status were assessed using multiple linear and generalized linear regression models. Results: Compared with controls, individuals with MDD showed significantly higher B AUC, indicating altered global integration profiles across connectivity thresholds. B AUC did not differ by illness course, illness duration, or symptom severity. In contrast, B AUC showed a graded increase across illness courses, with the highest values observed in recurrent depression. This effect was driven by an increased number of one-dimensional cycles rather than greater cycle persistence. Medication status further modulated B alterations, with elevated values observed in unmedicated single-episode and medicated recurrent MDD. Anatomical decomposition revealed that higher-order alterations were primarily driven by inter-network configurations spanning multiple large-scale functional systems. Discussion:These findings indicate that MDD is associated with altered multiscale functional organization, combining less compact global integration with an increased prevalence of cross-network hole-defining cycles, with these features varying systematically with illness course and current medication, suggesting that topology-informed measures capture clinically relevant variability in brain organization in depression.

neuroscience↗

Lifestyle, Early-life, and Genetic Health Risk Factors Underlying the Brain Age Gap: A Mega-Analysis Across 3,934 Individuals from the ENIGMA MDD Consortium

BackgroundLarge-scale studies show that adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) generally have a higher imaging-predicted age relative to their chronological age (i.e., positive brain age gap) compared to controls, though considerable within-group variation exists. This study examines lifestyle, early-life, and genetic health risk factors contributing to the brain age gap. Identifying risk and resilience factors could help protect brain and mental health. MethodsUsing an established model trained on FreeSurfer-derived brain regions (www.photon-ai.com/enigma_brainage), we generated brain age predictions for 1,846 controls and 2,088 individuals with MDD (aged 18-75) from 12 international cohorts. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) were calculated for major depression, C-reactive protein, and body mass index (BMI) using large-scale GWAS results. Linear mixed models were applied to assess lifestyle (BMI, smoking, education), early-life childhood trauma, and genetic (PRS) health risk associations with the brain age gap. Additionally, we evaluated the link between the brain age gap and peripheral biological age indicators (epigenetic clocks). ResultsHigher brain age gaps were significantly associated with BMI ({beta}=0.01, PFDR=0.02) and smoking ({beta}=0.11, PFDR=0.02), while lower brain age gaps were linked to higher education ({beta}=-0.02, PFDR=0.02). Higher childhood trauma scores predicted a higher brain age gap ({beta}=0.04, P=0.01). Higher brain age gaps were positively associated with all PRS ({beta}s=0.04-0.16, PsFDR=0.02-0.03). There were no significant interactions between diagnosis and assessed factors on the brain age gap. In a multivariable model, only modifiable health factors--BMI, smoking, and education--remained uniquely associated with brain age gaps. ConclusionsGenetic liability for depression and related traits is linked to poorer brain health, but health behaviors potentially offer a key opportunity for intervention. This study underscores the importance of targeting modifiable lifestyle factors to mitigate poor brain health in depressed individuals, an approach perhaps under-recognized in clinical practice.

neuroscience↗

First vs recurrent episode symptomatology in Major Depressive Disorder and its relation to brain function and structure: a network approach.

AbstractO_ST_ABSBackground.C_ST_ABSMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a prevalent psychiatric disorder. At least half of the patients who recover from a first depressive episode, will experience a relapse. Therefore, understanding the underlying mechanisms supporting relapse is a clinical urgency that could be informed by studying complex brain-behavior associations. Here, we investigated how the relationships between depressive symptomatology and regional brain characteristics differed between people with first depressive episode vs recurrent depression. Methods.We used REST-meta-MDD data from the DIRECT consortium. We focused on comparing global and local network properties between first (n=239) and recurrent episode (n=179) on: (i) symptom network, (ii) brain structural (VBM) and functional networks (ALFF, ReHO), and (iii) integrated symptoms network and brain characteristics using the psychopathology and multimodal network approach. Results.Symptom network analysis showed high values of strength centrality for "Insomnia: Early Hours of the Morning" and "General somatic symptoms" at recurrence compared to the first episode. Also, differences in global strength in the integrated symptom-brain network (measured with ReHo metric) (S=2.09 p= 0.042). Finally, we found the edge of specific symptom-brain links, including insomnia and somatic symptoms-, to differ between the first episode and recurrence. Conclusions.For symptom networks, local but not global properties differentiated first from recurrent episode MDD, with specially stronger relations of insomnia and somatic symptoms in recurrent episode depression. For integrated symptom-brain networks, global strength of the network reflecting regional functional integrity (ReHO) was related to recurrence. This suggests that symptoms have relevance for understanding the complex brain-symptom relations underpinning recurrence of depression.

neuroscience↗