In the face of competition, imperfect knowledge can lead to sustainable exploitation of a shared resource.
Overexploitation of a shared resource is a frequent phenomenon among groups of selfish consumers, known as the tragedy of the commons. To avoid "self-damage through self-interest", humans may either defend exclusive access to resources, or collectively adopt advanced cooperative behaviour and carefully designed spatial harvesting strategies to exploit a shared resource sustainably. However, why do many non-human species that are neither social nor territorial also appear to avoid overexploiting resources? This study shows that, even under highly competitive scenarios, cooperation is not necessary to sustainably exploit shared resources if individuals have imperfect knowledge about the distribution of those resources. Poorly informed individuals are more likely to inadvertently exploit resources in peripheral habitats, which may allow for higher resource renewal in the nearby and low-cost habitats, enhancing the sustainability of resource use. As a result, those consumers can achieve a long-term yield that approaches that of cooperative consumers and is higher than omniscient consumers. Ironically, while there might be an evolutionary drive for individuals to make well-informed decisions, consumers of shared resources may be collectively more prosperous when they make decisions based on less information. These findings might explain why apparently sub-optimal consumer behaviour appears so prevalent in nature.