Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

de Haan, L.

Publications and source records attributed to de Haan, L..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Association of extent of cannabis use and psychotic like intoxication experiences in a multi-national sample of First Episode Psychosis patients and controls

AimsFirst Episode Psychosis (FEP) patients who use cannabis experience more frequent psychotic and euphoric intoxication experiences compared to controls. It is not clear whether this is consequent to patients being more vulnerable to the effects of cannabis use or to their heavier pattern of use. We aimed to determine whether extent of use predicted psychotic-like and euphoric intoxication experiences in FEP patients and controls and whether this differs between groups. MethodsWe analysed data on lifetime cannabis using patients (n=655) and controls (n=654) across 15 sites from six countries in the EU-GEI study (2010-2015). We used multiple regression to model predictors of cannabis-induced experiences and to determine if there was an interaction between caseness and extent of use. ResultsCaseness, frequency of cannabis use and money spent on cannabis predicted psychotic-like and euphoric experiences, independent of other experiences (p[&le;]0.001). For psychotic-like experiences there was a significant interaction for caseness x frequency of use (p<0.001) and caseness x money spent on cannabis (p=0.001) such that FEP patients had increased experiences at increased levels of use compared to controls. There was no similar significant interaction for euphoric experiences (p>0.5). Conclusions and RelevanceFEP patients are particularly sensitive to increased psychotic-like, but not euphoric experiences, at higher frequency and amount of cannabis use compared to controls. This suggests a specific psychotomimetic response in patients related particularly to heavy cannabis use.

neuroscience

Jumping To Conclusions, General Intelligence, And Psychosis Liability: Findings From The Multicentric EU-GEI Case-Control Study

BackgroundThe \"jumping to conclusions\" (JTC) bias is associated with both psychosis and general cognition but their relationship is unclear. In this study, we set out to clarify the relationship between the JTC bias, IQ, psychosis and polygenic liability to schizophrenia and IQ.\n\nMethods817 FEP patients and 1294 population-based controls completed assessments of general intelligence (IQ), and JTC (assessed by the number of beads drawn on the probabilistic reasoning \"beads\" task) and provided blood or saliva samples from which we extracted DNA and computed polygenic risk scores for IQ and schizophrenia.\n\nResultsThe estimated proportion of the total effect of case/control differences on JTC mediated by IQ was 79%. Schizophrenia Polygenic Risk Score (SZ PRS) was non-significantly associated with a higher number of beads drawn (B= 0.47, 95% CI -0.21 to 1.16, p=0.17); whereas IQ PRS (B=0.51, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.76, p<0.001) significantly predicted the number of beads drawn, and was thus associated with reduced JTC bias. The JTC was more strongly associated with higher level of psychotic-like experiences (PLE) in controls, including after controlling for IQ (B= -1.7, 95% CI -2.8 to -0.5, p=0.006), but did not relate to delusions in patients.\n\nConclusionsthe JTC reasoning bias in psychosis is not a specific cognitive deficit but is rather a manifestation or consequence, of general cognitive impairment. Whereas, in the general population, the JTC bias is related to psychotic-like experiences, independent of IQ. The work has potential to inform interventions targeting cognitive biases in early psychosis.

neuroscience

Smoking and the risk for bipolar disorder: causal evidence from a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

ImportanceThere is increasing evidence that smoking is a risk factor for severe mental illness, including bipolar disorder. Conversely, patients with bipolar disorder might smoke more (often) as a result of the psychiatric disorder. Research that investigates causality and the direction of the relationship between smoking and bipolar disorder has been lacking.\n\nObjectiveTo investigate the direction and causal nature of the relationship between smoking and bipolar disorder we conducted a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) study.\n\nData sourcesPublicly available summary statistics from genome-wide association studies on bipolar disorder, smoking initiation, smoking heaviness, smoking cessation and lifetime smoking (i.e., a compound measure of heaviness, duration and cessation). We applied multiple analytical methods with different, orthogonal assumptions to triangulate results, including inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger or Egger SIMEX, weighted median, weighted mode, and Steiger filtered analyses.\n\nResultsAcross different methods of MR, consistent evidence was found for a positive effect of smoking on the odds of bipolar disorder (smoking initiation ORIVW=1.46, 95% CI=1.28-1.66, P=1.44x10-8, lifetime smoking ORIVW=1.72, 95% CI=1.29-2.28, P=1.8x10-4). The MR analyses of the liability of bipolar disorder on smoking provided no clear evidence of a strong causal effect (smoking initiation betaIVW= -0.008, 95% CI= -0.026-0.009, P=0.35; P=0.94; smoking heaviness betaIVW=0.028, 95% CI= 0.003-0.053, P=2.9x10-2; smoking cessation ORIVW= 0.997, 95% CI= 0.981-1.014, P=0.74; lifetime smoking betaIVW= -0.001, 95%CI=-0.022-0.020, P=0.95).\n\nConclusionsThese findings suggest that smoking initiation and lifetime smoking are likely to be a causal risk factor for developing bipolar disorder. We found some evidence that liability to smoking increased smoking heaviness. Given that smoking is a modifiable risk factor, these findings further support investment into smoking prevention and treatment in order to reduce mental health problems in future generations.

neuroscience