Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

de Beukelaar, T.

Publications and source records attributed to de Beukelaar, T..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Detecting Sleep Deprivation from Running Biomechanics Using Machine Learning Classification: A Comparison Between Wearable and Laboratory Motion Capture

Sleep deprivation is associated with impaired endurance performance and an increased risk of running-related injury. Previous research has identified alterations in running biomechanics following a single night of sleep deprivation under laboratory conditions. However, whether these biomechanical changes can be detected using wearable technology remains unknown. Twenty-one recreationally active runners completed submaximal treadmill running under both normal sleep and total sleep deprivation conditions in a randomized crossover design. Biomechanical features were extracted simultaneously using a full-body motion capture system and a trunk-mounted wearable sensor. Five machine learning classifiers were evaluated in two classification tasks: a within-subject task using paired recordings from the same individual, and a between-subject task performed without individual baseline data. Within-subject classification consistently exceeded chance level for both measurement systems, with best accuracies of 85% for the wearable sensor (Logistic Regression) and 83% for the motion capture system (Random Forest). These findings indicate that sleep deprivation produces a systematic and individually consistent biomechanical signature during running. In contrast, between-subject classification failed across nearly all models and systems, with accuracies remaining close to chance level ([~]50%), demonstrating that inter-individual variability obscures the sleep-deprivation signal in the absence of personalized baseline data. Both systems converged on temporal organization, loading-related variables, and stride-to-stride variability as the most discriminative feature domains. Contrary to expectations, the laboratory motion capture system did not outperform the wearable sensor. Together, these findings demonstrate that individualized, baseline-referenced monitoring is essential for detecting sleep-deprivation-related changes in running gait, and suggest that a single trunk-mounted wearable sensor may provide a practical solution for real-world monitoring when paired recordings are available.

bioengineering↗

Cortical Activity During Sustained Isometric Ankle Contractions Following Chronic Sleep Restriction: A High-Density EEG Study

BackgroundChronic sleep restriction (CSR) impairs cognitive function, but its effects on the cortical dynamics underlying active motor performance remain poorly understood. High-density EEG provides a means to examine task-related oscillatory activity across sensorimotor and attentional networks during movement. MethodsFifteen healthy males completed a randomized crossover study involving a CSR condition (five hours sleep per night for four nights) and a control condition (normal sleep). Before and after each intervention, participants performed sustained isometric ankle contractions at 40% of their maximal force while EEG was recorded. Source-reconstructed event-related desynchronization (ERD) was computed across theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands in the sensorimotor network and dorsal attention network. Sustained attention was assessed with the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) and perceived workload with the NASA Task Load Index. ResultsCSR successfully reduced sleep duration by 2.36 hours on average (p < .001). Following CSR, PVT reaction times increased significantly ({Delta} = +31 ms, p = .002) and attentional lapses increased ({Delta} = +9.87, p < .001). CSR produced a significant overall increase in ERD across bands, networks, and movement directions (F(1, 5713) = 14.20, p < .001). This effect was present in both the sensorimotor and dorsal attention networks. The ERD increase was specific to dorsiflexion and absent during plantarflexion (condition x session x movement direction: F(1, 5713) = 9.13, p = .003). Subjective mental demand increased following CSR (p = .027), while objective motor performance was largely unimpaired. ConclusionCSR increased broadband ERD during dorsiflexion across both sensorimotor and attentional networks, alongside impaired sustained attention and greater perceived mental demand. As motor performance was largely preserved, this increased ERD may reflect compensatory neural recruitment under sleep pressure.

neuroscience↗

Exercise Intensity Modulates the Validity of Non-Linear Heart Rate Time Series Analysis Window Length: Implications for DFAa1 Monitoring

PurposeDetrended fluctuation analysis alpha-1 (DFAa1) has emerged as a promising non-invasive biomarker for exercise intensity assessment. However, the standard 2-min analysis window lacks temporal resolution necessary for real-time training applications. This study systematically investigated the validity of shortened DFAa1 windows (30s and 1min) versus the 2-min reference across different intensities. MethodsPhysically active males completed three continuous cycling protocols: low-intensity training at the first lactate threshold (LOW, n=19), moderate-intensity training at the second lactate threshold (MOD, n=19), and a 30-min self-paced time trial (TT30, n=18). DFAa1 was calculated using 30-s, 1-min, and 2-min moving windows, advancing in 1s increments. Validity was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, and standard error of measurement (SEM). ResultsDuring LOW, both shortened windows showed poor agreement with the 2-min reference (30s: ICC=0.02, mean bias of -0.05; 1min: ICC=0.37, -0.02). During MOD, the 30-s window remained unreliable (ICC=0.32, -0.01), while the 1-min window achieved moderate reliability (ICC=0.63, 0.00). During TT30, both shortened windows substantially improved performance (30s: ICC=0.78, -0.02; 1min: ICC=0.95, -0.01), with the 1-min window achieving excellent reliability. ConclusionDFAa1 analysis window validity is intensity-dependent, with shortened windows showing progressively improved agreement as exercise intensity and heart rate increases. While the 2-min window remains essential for low-intensity monitoring, 1-min or 30-s windows provide appropriate validity during high-intensity exercise, enabling more-responsive real-time feedback. These results support adaptive windowing strategies that dynamically adjust window length based on exercise intensity and the number of included data points, to optimize the analytical validity-temporal responsiveness trade-off.

physiology↗

Effects of one night of sleep deprivation on single- and dual-task gait

Sleep deprivation impairs cognitive control, which may affect movements that rely on these processes, such as walking. To test whether gait changes after one night of sleep deprivation reflect reduced cognitive capacity, we compared its effects with those of dual-task walking (i.e., walking while performing a simultaneous cognitive task). We hypothesize that sleep deprivation will produce gait changes similar to those under dual-task conditions. Eighteen healthy adults (9 female, 9 male; 22.2 (2.3) yrs) were tested the morning after a sleep deprivation (SDEP) and a control night. Participants completed two 2-min trials: single-task walking and walking with a concurrent 2-back working memory task (DT, dual-task). Using lateral foot and pelvis marker trajectories, we calculated spatiotemporal parameters, foot placement error in antero-posterior (FPEAP) and mediolateral (FPEML) directions, and mediolateral margin of stability (MoSML). SDEP increased average step time (p<0.001) and step length (p=0.001), and DT reduced spatiotemporal variability. Both SDEP (p=0.001) and DT (p<0.001) reduced FPEAP, but only DT reduced FPEML (p<0.001). Additionally, mean MoSML decreased only in SDEP (p=0.011). Overall, these findings suggest that while sleep deprivation and dual-tasking both affect gait, the effects of sleep deprivation on gait cannot be fully explained by reduced cognitive resources.

neuroscience↗