Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Zuanazzi, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Zuanazzi, A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

rTMS to right parietal cortex decreases the precision of spatial priors in perceptual decision making

Throughout life human observers make perceptual decisions under uncertainty guided by prior knowledge about the worlds causal structure and properties. According to Bayesian probability theory, optimal decision making relies on integrating prior knowledge with current sensory inputs, weighted by their relative precisions (i.e., inverse of uncertainty). Thus, representing uncertainty is essential for optimal decisions. Although extensive research suggests that human perceptual decision making follows Bayesian principles, the neural underpinnings of priors and their uncertainties remain elusive. In this five-day study, we employed psychophysics, Bayesian causal inference models, and offline low-frequency (i.e., 1Hz) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to probe the role of right intraparietal sulcus (IPS), a key region for spatial processing, in the integration of prior knowledge with auditory/visual inputs for spatial decisions. Model-free and Bayesian modelling analyses consistently showed a reduction in the precision of observers long-term spatial prior and in the influence of their previous spatial choices on their current spatial decisions for right IPS-TMS compared to sham-TMS. In contrast, the causal prior and the auditory/visual uncertainties remained unaffected. The results show that offline IPS-TMS can selectively reduce the precision or influence of observers long-term spatial prior and their short-term spatial expectations on perceptual decisions, without affecting their causal prior or sensory uncertainties (i.e., likelihood). Our findings provide causal evidence for the role of parietal cortex, situated at the top of the audiovisual spatial processing hierarchy, in encoding the uncertainty of spatial - but not causal - priors during perceptual decision-making. Significance statementPerceptual decisions under uncertainty are pervasive in everyday life. Substantial evidence suggests that humans perform perceptual decisions near-optimally. They combine sensory inputs with prior knowledge about the signals causal structure and locations weighted by their uncertainties. Yet, the neural underpinnings remain elusive. Combining psychophysics, Bayesian models, and offline low-frequency inhibitory transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we provide causal evidence that the parietal cortex is crucial for encoding the uncertainty of spatial - but not causal - priors during perceptual decision-making. Intriguingly, observers relied less on their long-term and short-term prior spatial expectations after parietal-TMS, as compared to sham-TMS. These results provide important insights into the neural substrates of priors and their uncertainties as key ingredients for near-optimal decisions consistent with normative Bayesian principles.

neuroscience↗

Tracking the online construction of linguistic meaning through negation

Combinatoric linguistic operations underpin human language processes, but how meaning is composed and refined in the mind of the reader is not well understood. We address this puzzle by exploiting the ubiquitous function of negation. We track the online effects of negation ("not") and intensifiers ("really") on the representation of scalar adjectives (e.g., "good") in parametrically designed behavioral and neurophysiological (MEG) experiments. The behavioral data show that participants first interpret negated adjectives as affirmative and later modify their interpretation towards, but never exactly as, the opposite meaning. Decoding analyses of neural activity further reveal significant above chance decoding accuracy for negated adjectives within 600 ms from adjective onset, suggesting that negation does not invert the representation of adjectives (i.e., "not bad" represented as "good"); furthermore, decoding accuracy for negated adjectives is found to be significantly lower than that for affirmative adjectives. Overall, these results suggest that negation mitigates rather than inverts the neural representations of adjectives. This putative suppression mechanism of negation is supported by increased synchronization of beta-band neural activity in sensorimotor areas. The analysis of negation provides a steppingstone to understand how the human brain represents changes of meaning over time.

neuroscience↗

Spatial attention and expectations rely on modality-specific and multisensory mechanisms

In our natural environment, the brain needs to combine signals from multiple sensory modalities into a coherent percept. While spatial attention guides perceptual decisions by prioritizing processing of signals that are task-relevant, spatial expectations encode the probability of signals over space. Previous studies have shown that behavioral effects of spatial attention generalize across sensory modalities. However, because they manipulated spatial attention as signal probability over space, these studies could not dissociate attention and expectation or assess their interaction. In two experiments, we orthogonally manipulated spatial attention (i.e., task-relevance) and expectation (i.e., signal probability) selectively in one sensory modality (i.e., primary modality) (experiment 1: audition, experiment 2: vision) and assessed their effects on primary and secondary sensory modalities in which attention and expectation were held constant. Our results show behavioral effects of spatial attention that are comparable for audition and vision as primary modalities; yet, signal probabilities were learnt more slowly in audition, so that spatial expectations were formed later in audition than vision. Critically, when these differences in learning between audition and vision were accounted for, both spatial attention and expectation affected responses more strongly in the primary modality in which they were manipulated, and generalized to the secondary modality only in an attenuated fashion. Collectively, our results suggest that both spatial attention and expectation rely on modality-specific and multisensory mechanisms.

neuroscience↗

The intricate interplay of spatial attention and expectation

Spatial attention and expectation are two critical top-down mechanisms controlling perceptual inference. Based on previous research it remains unclear whether their influence on perceptual decisions is additive or interactive.\n\nWe developed a novel multisensory approach that orthogonally manipulated spatial attention (i.e. task relevance) and expectation (i.e. signal probability) selectively in audition and evaluated their effects on observers responses in vision. Critically, while experiment 1 manipulated expectation directly via the probability of task-relevant auditory targets across hemifields, experiment 2 manipulated it indirectly via task-irrelevant auditory non-targets.\n\nSurprisingly, our results demonstrate that spatial attention and signal probability influence perceptual decisions either additively or interactively. These seemingly contradictory results can be explained parsimoniously by a model that combines spatial attention, general and spatially selective response probabilities as predictors with no direct influence of signal probability. Our model provides a novel perspective on how spatial attention and expectations facilitate effective interactions with the environment.

neuroscience↗