Biology subjects

Zirden, L. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Zirden, L. C..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Differences in substrate engagement and Retinoblastoma protein (RB) binding of human KDM5A and KDM5B

Trimethylation of lysine 4 of histone H3 (H3K4me3) is a post-translational modification (PTM) enriched at promoters of actively transcribed genes. H3K4me3 is removed by the human histone demethylases of the KDM5 family. KDM5 demethylases act as transcriptional repressors through their catalytic activity in addition to more complex roles that depend on their interactions with other chromatin regulators and may be independent of demethylase activity. To better understand the mechanistic differences of the closely related paralogs KDM5A and KDM5B as well as their interactions with Retinoblastoma protein (RB), we systematically analyzed and compared their demethylase activities, nucleosome engagement, and RB binding. We used recombinant nucleosome binding and demethylase activity assays, as well as an integrative structural biology approach using negative-stain electron microscopy (EM), AlphaFold predictions, and cross-linking mass spectrometry for a comprehensive in vitro analysis of these critical and largely non-redundant enzymes. KDM5A and KDM5B showed differences in enzyme kinetics using peptide substrates, as well as in nucleosome binding. Furthermore, KDM5A interacts with RB, mainly mediated by its canonical LxCxE RB binding motif. KDM5B, on the other hand, lacks an LxCxE binding motif and does not stably bind to RB under the conditions tested here. RB directly interacts with nucleosomes, and its nucleosome binding does not measurably affect KDM5A demethylase activity or nucleosome interactions. Our findings provide a biochemical framework for the differences between KDM5A and KDM5B regarding RB interactions and nucleosome engagement.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2024

Conformational plasticity of a BiP-GRP94 chaperone complex

Hsp70/Hsp90-chaperones and their regulatory co-chaperones are critical for maintaining protein homeostasis. GRP94, the sole Hsp90-chaperone in the secretory pathway of mammalian cells, is essential for the maturation of important secretory and transmembrane proteins. Without the requirement of co-chaperones, the Hsp70-protein BiP controls regulatory conformational changes of GRP94 - the structural basis of which has remained elusive. Here, we biochemically and structurally characterize the formation of a BiP-GRP94 chaperone complex and its transition to a conformation expected to support the loading of substrate proteins from BiP onto GRP94. BiP initially binds to the open GRP94 dimer via an interaction interface that is conserved among Hsp70/90 paralogs. Subsequently, binding of a second BiP protein stabilizes a semi-closed GRP94 dimer, thereby advancing the chaperone cycle. Our findings highlight a fundamental mechanism of direct Hsp70/90 cooperation, independent of co-chaperones.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2023

Activation of automethylated PRC2 by dimerization on chromatin

Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) is an epigenetic regulator that trimethylates lysine 27 of histone 3 (H3K27me3) and is essential for embryonic development and cellular differentiation. H3K27me3 is associated with transcriptionally repressed chromatin and is established when PRC2 is allosterically activated upon methyl-lysine binding by the regulatory subunit EED. Automethylation of the catalytic subunit EZH2 stimulates its activity by an unknown mechanism. Here, we show that PRC2 forms a dimer on chromatin in which an inactive, automethylated PRC2 protomer is the allosteric activator of a second PRC2 that is poised to methylate H3 of a substrate nucleosome. Functional assays support our model of allosteric trans-autoactivation via EED, suggesting a novel mechanism mediating context- dependent activation of PRC2. Our work showcases the molecular mechanism of auto- modification coupled dimerization in the regulation of chromatin modifying complexes.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2021

AMPK-dependent phosphorylation is required for transcriptional activation of TFEB/TFE3

Increased autophagy and lysosomal activity promote tumor growth, survival and chemo-resistance. During acute starvation, autophagy is rapidly engaged by AMPK activation and mTORC1 inhibition to maintain energy homeostasis and cell survival. TFEB and TFE3 are master transcriptional regulators of autophagy and lysosomal activity and their cytoplasm/nuclear shuttling is controlled by mTORC1-dependent multisite phosphorylation. However, it is not known whether and how the transcriptional activity of TFEB or TFE3 is regulated. We show that AMPK mediates phosphorylation of TFEB and TFE3 on three serine residues, leading to TFEB/TFE3 transcriptional activity upon nutrient starvation, FLCN depletion and pharmacological manipulation of mTORC1 or AMPK. AMPK loss does not affect TFEB/TFE3 nuclear localization nor protein levels but reduces their transcriptional activity. Collectively, we show that mTORC1 specifically controls TFEB/TFE3 cytosolic retention whereas AMPK is essential for TFEB/TFE3 transcriptional activity. This dual and opposing regulation of TFEB/TFE3 by mTORC1 and AMPK is reminiscent of the regulation of another critical regulator of autophagy, ULK1. Surprisingly, we show that chemoresistance is mediated by AMPK-dependent activation of TFEB, which is abolished by pharmacological inhibition of AMPK or mutation of serine 466/467/469 to alanine residues within TFEB. Altogether, we show that AMPK is a key regulator of TFEB/TFE3 transcriptional activity, and we validate AMPK as a promising target in cancer therapy to evade chemotherapeutic resistance.

cancer biology↗