Zilpelwar, S. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2023

Measuring human cerebral blood flow and brain function with fiber-based speckle contrast optical spectroscopy system

Cerebral blood flow (CBF) is an important indicator of brain health and function. Diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) is an optical technique that enables non-invasive and continuous bedside monitoring of human CBF. However, traditional DCS consisting of a few channels has relatively low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), preventing measurements at long source detector separations (SDS) with increased sensitivity to cerebral rather than extracerebral blood flow. Here we developed a fiber-based speckle contrast optical spectroscopy (SCOS) system and the corresponding data analysis pipeline to measure CBF variations. We show that SCOS outperforms traditional DCS by more than an order of magnitude in SNR with comparable financial cost. We also demonstrated human brain function measurements during a cognitive task at an SDS of 33 mm. This technology will establish the foundation for devices that use spatial speckle statistics to non-invasively monitor human CBF, leading to a new functional neuroimaging approach for cognitive neuroscience.

bioengineering↗

bioRxiv2021

Guidelines for obtaining an absolute blood flow index with laser speckle contrast imaging

Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) is a technique broadly applied in research and clinical settings for full-field characterization of tissue perfusion. It is based on the analysis of speckle pattern contrast, which can be theoretically related to the decorrelation time - a quantitative measure of dynamics. A direct contrast to decorrelation time conversion, however, requires prior knowledge of specific parameters of the optical system and scattering media and thus is often impractical. For this reason, and because of the nature of some of the most common applications, LSCI is historically used to measure relative blood flow change. Over time, the belief that the absolute blood flow index measured with LSCI is not a reliable metric and thus should not be used has become more widespread. This belief has resulted from the use of LSCI to compare perfusion in different animal models and to obtain longitudinal blood flow index observations without proper consideration given to the stability of the measurement. Here, we aim to clarify the issues that give rise to variability in the repeatability of the quantitative blood flow index and to present guidelines on how to make robust absolute blood flow index measurements with conventional single-exposure LSCI. We also explain how to calibrate contrast to compare measurements from different systems and show examples of applications that are enabled by high repeatability.

bioengineering↗