Biology subjects

Zheng, C. Y.

Publications and source records attributed to Zheng, C. Y..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Linear and categorical coding units in the mouse gustatory cortex drive population dynamics and behavior in taste decision-making

Cortical circuits produce time-varying patterns of population and single neuron activity that play a fundamental role in perceptual and behavioral processes. However, the functional contributions of individual neuron activity to population dynamics and behavior remain unclear. Here we addressed this issue focusing on the mouse gustatory cortex (GC) and using a taste mixture-based decision-making task, high-density electrophysiology, and computational modeling. GC population dynamics represented stimuli linearly during taste sampling and choices categorically before decisions. Single neurons were classified by their linear and categorical activity patterns, revealing subpopulations encoding sensory, perceptual, and decisional variables. To test their functional role, we built a recurrent neural network model of GC. Model perturbations showed linear and categorical neurons were essential for driving normal population dynamics and behavioral performance, whereas many units with other activity patterns could be silenced without consequence. These results have implications that extend beyond GC, and demonstrate the role of linear and categorical coding neurons in cortical dynamics and behavior during perceptual decision-making.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Computational characterization of metacognitive ability in subjective decision-making

Metacognition is the process of reflecting on and controlling ones own thoughts and behaviors. Metacognitive ability is often measured through modeling the relationship between confidence reports and choice behavior in tasks where performance can be objectively measured. Previous work has explored whether metacognitive ability is conserved across different types of tasks, and across different domains such as perception and memory. However, it is unclear whether approaches to the assessment of metacognitive ability that have worked in these contexts can be extended to value-based decision-making where objective accuracy cannot be evaluated. Here, we compare metacognitive ability across different tasks spanning perception and valuation, using Bayesian hierarchical estimation of the parameters of a computational process model of confidence. This model captures metacognitive ability as the uncertainty of an individuals own decision uncertainty, and can do so in the space of any decision variable, regardless of whether it indexes external features or internal, subjective states. We find that metacognitive ability can be reliably estimated in both objective and subjective decision-making tasks, and is relatively well conserved across tasks, especially within domains and similar confidence reporting paradigms.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

THINGS-data: A multimodal collection of large-scale datasets for investigating object representations in brain and behavior

Understanding object representations requires a broad, comprehensive sampling of the objects in our visual world with dense measurements of brain activity and behavior. Here we present THINGS-data, a multimodal collection of large-scale neuroimaging and behavioral datasets in humans, comprising densely-sampled functional MRI and magnetoencephalographic recordings, as well as 4.70 million similarity judgments in response to thousands of photographic images for up to 1,854 object concepts. THINGS-data is unique in its breadth of richly-annotated objects, allowing for testing countless hypotheses at scale while assessing the reproducibility of previous findings. Beyond the unique insights promised by each individual dataset, the multimodality of THINGS-data allows combining datasets for a much broader view into object processing than previously possible. Our analyses demonstrate the high quality of the datasets and provide five examples of hypothesis-driven and data-driven applications. THINGS-data constitutes the core public release of the THINGS initiative (https://things-initiative.org) for bridging the gap between disciplines and the advancement of cognitive neuroscience.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Great Expectations: A Critical Review of and Recommendations for the study of Reward Processing as a Cause and Predictor of Depression

Both human and animal studies support the relationship between depression and reward processing abnormalities, giving rise to the expectation that neural signals of these processes may serve as biomarkers or mechanistic treatment targets. Given the great promise of this research line, we scrutinize those findings and the theoretical claims that underlie them. To achieve this, we apply the framework provided by classical work on causality as well as contemporary approaches to prediction. We identify a number of conceptual, practical, and analytical challenges to this line of research, and use a pre-registered meta-analysis to quantify the longitudinal associations between reward processing aberrations and depression. We also investigate the impact of measurement error on reported data. We find that reward processing abnormalities do not reach levels that would be useful for clinical prediction, yet the evidence thus far does not exclude their possible causal role in depression.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Detecting and harmonizing scanner differences in the ABCD study - annual release 1.0

In order to obtain the sample sizes needed for robustly reproducible effects, it is often necessary to acquire data at multiple sites using different MRI scanners. This poses a challenge for investigators to account for the variance due to scanner, as balanced sampling is often not an option. Similarly, longitudinal studies must deal with known and unknown changes to scanner hardware and software over time. In this manuscript, we have explored scanner-related differences in the dataset recently released by the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) project, a multi-site, longitudinal study of children age 9-10. We demonstrate that scanner manufacturer, model, as well as the individual scanner itself, are detectable in the resting and task-based fMRI results of the ABCD dataset. We further demonstrate that these differences can be harmonized using an empirical Bayes approach known as ComBat. We argue that accounting for scanner variance, including even minor differences in scanner hardware or software, is crucial for any analysis.

neuroscience↗