Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Zetterberg, H.

Publications and source records attributed to Zetterberg, H..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Heritability and genetic variance of dementia with Lewy bodies

Recent large-scale genetic studies have allowed for the first glimpse of the effects of common genetic variability in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), identifying risk variants with appreciable effect sizes. However, it is currently well established that a substantial portion of the genetic heritable component of complex traits is not captured by genome-wide significant SNPs. To overcome this issue, we have estimated the proportion of phenotypic variance explained by genetic variability (SNP heritability) in DLB using a method that is unbiased by allele frequency or linkage disequilibrium properties of the underlying variants. This shows that the heritability of DLB is nearly twice as high as previous estimates based on common variants only (31% vs 59.9%). We also determine the amount of phenotypic variance in DLB that can be explained by recent polygenic risk scores from either Parkinsons disease (PD) or Alzheimers disease (AD), and show that, despite being highly significant, they explain a low amount of variance. Additionally, to identify pleiotropic events that might improve our understanding of the disease, we performed genetic correlation analyses of DLB with over 200 diseases and biomedically relevant traits. Our data shows that DLB has a positive correlation with education phenotypes, which is opposite to what occurs in AD. Overall, our data suggests that novel genetic risk factors for DLB should be identified by larger GWAS and these are likely to be independent from known AD and PD risk variants.

neuroscience

The MS4A gene cluster is a key regulator of soluble TREM2 and Alzheimer disease risk

Soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2) levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have been associated with Alzheimer disease (AD) status. TREM2 plays a critical role in microglial activation, survival, and phagocytosis; however, the pathophysiological role of sTREM2 in AD is not well understood. Understanding the role of sTREM2 in AD may help reveal biological mechanisms underlying AD and identify novel therapeutic targets. We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify genetic modifiers of CSF sTREM2 levels. Common variants in the membrane-spanning 4-domains subfamily A (MS4A) gene region were associated with higher CSF sTREM2 levels (rs1582763; P = 1.15x10-15) and replicated in independent datasets. The variants associated with increased levels of sTREM2 are also associated with reduced AD risk and delayed age-at-onset. Rs1582763 influences expression of MS4A4A and MS4A6A in multiple tissues, suggesting that one or both of these genes are important for regulating sTREM2. MS4A genes encode transmembrane proteins that may play a role in intracellular protein trafficking in microglia. We used human macrophages to begin to test the relationship between MS4A4A and TREM2 and found that they co-localize intracellularly and that antibody-mediated targeting of MS4A4A reduces sTREM2. Thus, genetic, molecular, and cellular findings suggest that MS4A4A regulates sTREM2. These findings also provide a mechanistic explanation of the original GWAS signal in the MS4A locus for AD risk and indicate that TREM2 is involved in sporadic AD risk in general, not only in TREM2 risk-variant carriers.

genomics

Prion protein quantification in cerebrospinal fluid as a tool for prion disease drug development

Reduction of native prion protein (PrP) levels in the brain is an attractive and genetically validated strategy for the treatment or prevention of human prion diseases. However, clinical development of any PrP-reducing therapeutic will require an appropriate pharmacodynamic biomarker: a practical and robust method for quantifying PrP, and reliably demonstrating its reduction, in the central nervous system (CNS) of a living patient. Here we evaluate the potential of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based quantification of human PrP in human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to serve as a biomarker for PrP-reducing therapeutics. We show that CSF PrP is highly sensitive to plastic adsorption during handling and storage, but its loss can be minimized by addition of detergent. We find that blood contamination does not affect CSF PrP levels, and that CSF PrP and hemoglobin are uncorrelated, together suggesting that CSF PrP is CNS-derived, supporting its relevance for monitoring the tissue of interest and in keeping with high PrP abundance in brain relative to blood. In a cohort with controlled sample handling, CSF PrP exhibits good within-subject test-retest reliability (mean coefficient of variation 13% in samples collected 8-11 weeks apart), a sufficiently stable baseline to allow therapeutically meaningful reductions in brain PrP to be readily detected in CSF. Together, these findings supply a method for monitoring the effect of a PrP-reducing drug in the CNS, enabling the development of prion disease therapeutics with this mechanism of action.

molecular biology

Neurofilament light as a blood biomarker for neurodegeneration in Down syndrome

INTRODUCTIONDown syndrome (DS) may be considered a genetic form of Alzheimers disease (AD) due to universal development of AD neuropathology, but diagnosis and treatment trials are hampered by a lack of reliable blood biomarkers. A potential biomarker is neurofilament light (NF-L), due to its association with axonal damage in neurodegenerative conditions.\n\nMETHODSWe measured blood NF-L concentration in 100 adults with DS using Simoa NF-light(R) assays, and examined relationships with age, and cross-sectional and longitudinal dementia diagnosis.\n\nRESULTSNF-L levels increased with age (Spearmans rho = 0.789, p<0.001), with a steep increase after age 40, and were predictive of dementia status (p=0.022 adjusting for age, sex, and APOE4) but showed no relationship with longstanding epilepsy or premorbid ability. Baseline NF-L levels were associated with longitudinal dementia status.\n\nDISCUSSIONNF-L is a biomarker for neurodegeneration in DS, with potential for use in future clinical trials to prevent or delay dementia.\n\nResearch in contextO_ST_ABSSystematic reviewC_ST_ABSThe authors reviewed the literature using PubMed searches supplemented with our knowledge of pending papers in this research area. While blood NF-L has been associated with clinical features of progression in a number of neurodegenerative conditions, we have not identified any reports of NF-L associated with cognitive decline in DS, a genetic form of AD.\n\nInterpretationOur findings demonstrate the potential utility of NF-L as a blood biomarker of neurodegeneration in DS, a population that may not be able to tolerate more invasive procedures such as neuroimaging and lumbar punctures to track progression.\n\nFuture directionsThe association between NF-L and other markers of longitudinal AD progression should be explored further in future work.

molecular biology

CSF biomarkers are differentially related to structural and functional changes in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type

The two cardinal pathologies of Alzheimers disease (AD) develop according to distinct anatomical trajectories. Cerebral tau-related pathology first accumulates in the mesial temporal region, while amyloid-related pathology first appears in neocortex. The eventual distributions of these pathologies reflect their anatomical origins. An implication is that the cardinal pathologies might exert preferential effects on the structurofunctional brain changes observed in AD. We investigated this hypothesis in 39 patients with dementia of the Alzheimers type. Interrelationships were analysed between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of the cardinal pathologies, volumetric brain changes using magnetic resonance imaging, and brain metabolism using [18F]-FDG-PET. Amyloid-related pathology was preferentially associated with structurofunctional changes in the precuneus and lateral temporal regions. Tau-related pathology was not associated with changes in these regions. These findings support the hypothesis that tau- and amyloid-pathology exert differential effects on structurofunctional changes in the AD brain. These findings have implications for future therapeutic trials and hint at a more complex relationship between the cardinal pathologies and disruption of brain networks.

neuroscience

Age-accelerated cognitive decline in asymptomatic adults with CSF β-amyloid

ObjectiveCompare cognitive and hippocampal volume (HCV) trajectories in asymptomatic middle-aged and older adults with positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) markers of {beta}-amyloid (A{beta}) or tau to adults without an AD-associated biomarker profile.\n\nMethod392 adults enrolled in a longitudinal cohort study (Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimers Prevention or Wisconsin Alzheimers Disease Research Center) completed a lumbar puncture and at least two biennial or annual neuropsychological evaluations. Cutoffs for A{beta}42, total tau, and phosphorylated tau were developed via receiver operating characteristic curve analyses on a sample of 78 participants (38 dementia, 40 controls). These cutoffs were applied to a separate sample of 314 cognitively healthy adults (mean age at CSF collection = 61.5) and mixed-effects regression analyses tested linear and quadratic interactions of biomarker group x age at each visit on cognitive and HCV outcomes.\n\nResults215 participants (69%) were biomarker negative (preclinical AD Stage 0), 46 (15%) were A{beta}+ only (preclinical AD Stage 1), 25 (8%) were A{beta}+ and tau+ (preclinical AD Stage 2), and 28 (9%) were tau+ only. Both Stage 1 and Stage 2 groups exhibited greater rates of linear decline on story memory and processing speed measures, and non-linear decline on list-learning and set-shifting measures compared to Stage 0. The tau+ only group did not significantly differ from Stage 0 in rates of cognitive decline.\n\nConclusionIn an asymptomatic at-risk cohort, elevated CSF A{beta} (with or without elevated tau) was associated with greater rates of cognitive decline, with the specific pattern of decline varying across cognitive measures.

neuroscience