Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Zea-Redondo, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Zea-Redondo, L..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Specialised super-enhancer networks in stem cells and neurons

Super-enhancers (SEs) are clusters of enhancers with high transcriptional activity that play essential roles in defining cell identity through regulation of nearby genes. SEs preferentially form multiway chromatin interactions with other SEs and highly transcribed regions in embryonic stem cells. However, the properties of the interacting SEs and their specific contributions to complex regulatory interactions in differentiated cell types remain poorly understood. Here, we compare the structural and functional properties of SEs between embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and dopaminergic neurons (DNs) by combining Genome Architecture Mapping (GAM), chromatin accessibility, histone modification, and transcriptome data. Most SEs are cell-type specific and establish extensive pairwise and multiway chromatin interactions with other SEs and genes with cell-type specific expression. SE interactions span megabase genomic distances and frequently connect distant topologically associating domains. By applying network centrality analyses, we detected SEs with different hierarchical importance. Highest network centrality SEs contain binding motifs for cell-type specific transcription factors, and are candidate regulatory hubs. The functional heterogeneity of SEs is also highlighted by their organisation into modular sub-networks that differ in structure and spatial scale between ESCs and DNs, with more specific and strongly connected SE modules in post-mitotic neurons. Our results uncover both the high complexity and specificity of SE-based 3D regulatory networks and provide a resource for prioritizing SEs with potential roles in transcriptional regulation and disease.

genomics↗

SRRM2 splicing factor modulates cell fate in early development

Embryo development is an orchestrated process that relies on tight regulation of gene expression to guide cell differentiation and fate decisions. Alternative splicing is modulated during development as an additional layer of regulation to reprogram gene expression patterns. The Srrm2 splicing factor has recently been implicated in developmental disorders and diseases, but its role in early mammalian development remains unexplored. Here, we show that Srrm2 dosage is critical for maintaining embryonic stem cell pluripotency and cell identity. Srrm2 heterozygosity promotes loss of stemness, characterized by the coexistence of cells expressing naive and formative pluripotency markers, together with extensive changes in gene expression, including genes regulated by serum- response transcription factor and differentiation-related genes. Depletion of Srrm2 by RNA interference in embryonic stem cells shows that the earliest effects of Srrm2 half-dosage are specific alternative splicing events on a small number of genes, followed by expression changes in metabolism and differentiation-related genes. Our findings unveil molecular and cellular roles of Srrm2 in stemness and lineage commitment, shedding light on the roles of splicing regulators in early embryogenesis, developmental diseases and tumorigenesis. Summary statementThis article emphasizes the importance of splicing regulators in early mammalian development by uncovering roles of SRRM2 splicing factor dosage in pluripotency, providing novel insights for a better understanding of Srrm2-related diseases.

developmental biology↗

3D genome topologies distinguish pluripotent epiblast and primitive endoderm cells in the mouse blastocyst

The development of embryonic cell lineages is tightly controlled by transcription factors that regulate gene expression and chromatin organisation. To investigate the specialisation of 3D genome structure in pluripotent or extra-embryonic endoderm lineages, we applied Genome Architecture Mapping (GAM) in embryonic stem (ES) cells, extra-embryonic endoderm (XEN) stem cells, and in their in vivo counterparts, the epiblast (Epi) and primitive endoderm (PrE) cells, respectively. We discover extensive differences in 3D genome topology including the formation domain boundaries that differ between Epi and PrE lineages, both in vivo and in vitro, at lineage commitment genes. In ES cells, Sox2 contacts other active regions enriched for NANOG and SOX2 binding sites. PrE-specific genes, such as Lama1 and Gata6, form repressive chromatin hubs in ES cells. Lama1 activation in XEN or PrE cells coincides with its extensive decondensation. Putative binding sites for OCT4 and SNAIL, or GATA4/6, distinguish chromatin contacts unique to embryonic or extra-embryonic lineages, respectively. Overall, 3D genome folding is highly specialised in early development, especially at genes encoding factors driving lineage identity. HighlightsO_LIES and XEN cells have specialised 3D genome structures C_LIO_LIGAM applied in the blastocyst distinguishes Epi and PrE genome structures C_LIO_LILineage specific genes establish cell-type specific chromatin contacts C_LIO_LISpecific chromatin contacts feature putative bindings sites for GATA4/6 in XEN cells and SNAIL in ES cells C_LI

developmental biology↗