Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Zarghami, T. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Zarghami, T. S..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Multi-Scale Parcellation of Dynamic Causal Models of the Brain

The hierarchical organization of the brains distributed network has received growing interest from the neuroscientific community, largely because of its potential to enhance our understanding of human cognition and behavior, in health and disease. This interest is motivated by the hypothesis that near-critical brain dynamics enable multiscale integration and segregation of neural dynamics. While most multiscale connectivity analyses focus on structural and functional networks, characterizing the effective connectome across multiple scales has been somewhat overlooked--primarily for computational reasons. The difficulty of estimating large cyclic causal models, together with the scarcity of theoretical frameworks for systematically moving between scales, has hindered progress in this direction. This technical note introduces a top-down multiscale parcellation scheme for dynamic causal models, with application to neuroimaging data. The method is based on Bayesian model comparison, as a generalization of the well-known {Delta}BIC method. To facilitate computation, recent developments in linear dynamic causal modeling (DCM) and Bayesian model reduction (BMR) are deployed. Specifically, a naive version of BMR is introduced, enabling the parcellation scheme to scale to hundreds or thousands of regions. Notably, the derivations reveal an analytical relationship between reduced model evidence and minimum cut problem in graph theory. This duality puts the tools of graph theory at the service of model evidence optimization and significance testing. The proposed method was applied to simulated and empirical causal models to establish face and construct validity. Consequently, the large empirical causal network, inferred from a neuroimaging dataset, exhibited log-log scaling trends, suggestive of scale invariance in multiple dynamical measures. Future generalizations of this technique and its potential applications in systems and clinical neuroscience are discussed.

neuroscience↗

A new causal centrality measure reveals the prominent role of subcortical structures in the causal architecture of the extended default mode network

Network representation has been a groundbreaking concept for understanding the behavior of complex systems in social sciences, biology, neuroscience, and beyond. Network science is mathematically founded on graph theory, where nodal importance is gauged using measures of centrality. Notably, recent work suggests that the topological centrality of a node should not be over-interpreted as its dynamical or causal importance in the network. Hence, identifying the influential nodes in dynamic causal models (DCM) remains an open question. This paper introduces causal centrality for DCM, a dynamics-sensitive and causally-founded centrality measure based on the notion of intervention in graphical models. Operationally, this measure simplifies to an identifiable expression using Bayesian model reduction. As a proof of concept, the average DCM of the extended default mode network (eDMN) was computed in 74 healthy subjects. Next, causal centralities of different regions were computed for this causal graph, and compared against major graph-theoretical centralities. The results showed that the subcortical structures of the eDMN are more causally central than the cortical regions, even though the (dynamics-free) graph-theoretical centralities unanimously favor the latter. Importantly, model comparison revealed that only the pattern of causal centrality was causally relevant. These results are consistent with the crucial role of the subcortical structures in the neuromodulatory systems of the brain, and highlight their contribution to the organization of large-scale networks. Potential applications of causal centrality - to study other neurotypical and pathological functional networks - are discussed, and some future lines of research are outlined.

neuroscience↗

Dysconnection and cognition in schizophrenia: a spectral dynamic causal modeling study

Schizophrenia (SZ) is a severe mental disorder characterized by failure of functional integration (aka dysconnection) across the brain. Recent functional connectivity (FC) studies have adopted functional parcellations to define subnetworks of large-scale networks, and to characterize the (dys)connection between them, in normal and clinical populations. While FC examines statistical dependencies between observations, model-based effective connectivity (EC) can disclose the causal influences that underwrite the observed dependencies. In this study, we investigated resting state EC between the subnetworks of seven large-scale networks, in 66 SZ and 74 healthy subjects from a public dataset. The results showed that a remarkable 33% of the effective connections (among subnetworks) of the cognitive control network had been pathologically modulated in SZ. Further dysconnection was identified within the visual, default mode and sensorimotor networks of SZ subjects, with 24%, 20% and 11% aberrant couplings. Overall, the proportion of diagnostic connections was remarkably larger in EC (24%) than FC (1%) analysis. Subsequently, to study the neural correlates of impaired cognition in SZ, we conducted a canonical correlation analysis between the EC parameters and the cognitive scores of the patients. As such, the self-inhibitions of supplementary motor area and paracentral lobule (in the sensorimotor network) and the excitatory connection from parahippocampal gyrus to inferior temporal gyrus (in the cognitive control network) were significantly correlated with the social cognition, reasoning/problem solving and working memory capabilities of the patients. Future research can investigate the potential of whole-brain EC as a biomarker for diagnosis of brain disorders and for cognitive assessment.

neuroscience↗