Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Zarate Penate, E.

Publications and source records attributed to Zarate Penate, E..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Immune gene co-expression networks are constrained by a non-linear topology spectral relationship

Inter-individual heterogeneity poses a fundamental challenge to systems-level characterization of immune states. When examined in isolation, network metrics exhibit extensive distributional overlap between conditions, providing little discriminatory power at the donor level. We hypothesized that immune states differ not in isolated properties but in the geometric constraints governing their joint distribution. We constructed donor-level gene co-expression networks from peripheral blood mononuclear cells across a Discovery cohort (CLARITY/SLE; n[~]Healthy[~] = 74, n[~]Disease[~] = 86) and an independent Validation cohort (STEPHENSON/COVID-19), totaling 259 unique donors. Network modularity (Q) and leading eigenvalue ({lambda}[~]max[~]) distributions overlapped substantially between conditions (Q: Wilcoxon p = 0.913, Cliffs {delta} = 0.01, 95% CI [-0.17, 0.19]; {lambda}[~]max[~]: p = 0.108, {delta} = 0.15, 95% CI [-0.04, 0.34]). However, mapping donors into a joint modularity-spectral energy space revealed a non-monotonic organizational constraint: networks with high modularity exhibit constrained spectral energy, while low-modularity networks permit dominant collective modes. Critically, configurations combining high modularity with high spectral leakage are empirically absent--defining an empirically unoccupied (forbidden) zone in the state space. The two cohorts occupy opposite arms of this U-shaped crossover (Discovery: {rho} = -0.39; Validation: {rho} = +0.41), explaining their opposite correlation signs as sampling different regions of a single underlying constraint. This geometry persists across network densities (5-10%), sampling depths (500-800 cells), and within major cell lineages (CD4+ T cells, Monocytes). These findings characterize immune network organization not by univariate biomarkers, but by geometric boundaries that constrain permissible configurations. Significance StatementImmune responses vary substantially across individuals, frustrating efforts to identify universal organizational principles. We analyzed gene co-expression networks from peripheral blood mononuclear cells across 259 donors in two independent cohorts and found that neither network modularity nor spectral dominance alone distinguishes healthy from disease states--distributions overlap extensively. However, plotting these properties jointly reveals that observed immune networks are confined to a restricted region of the modularity-spectral energy space, while configurations combining high modularity with high spectral energy are empirically absent. This geometric constraint persists across cohorts, sampling depths, and cell lineages, suggesting a robust structural trade-off between compartmentalization and collective coordination in immune network architecture.

immunology↗

A Falsifiable Framework for Testing Neutralityin T-Cell Receptor Repertoire Databases

BackgroundT-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire databases aggregate antigen-specific sequences from hundreds of studies, exhibiting heavy-tailed occurrence distributions commonly interpreted as signatures of selection or criticality. However, distinguishing genuine non-neutral dynamics from neutral drift with realistic biological constraints requires explicit computational null models--currently absent from repertoire immunology. MethodsWe developed a biologically calibrated neutral null model incorporating thymic output, negative selection, and peripheral homeostasis with parameters independently derived from immunology literature (Robins et al. 2009, naive repertoires). The model was validated against empirical repertoire statistics before generating predictions. We compared neutral predictions to occurrence patterns from 24,847 TCR-epitope combinations in VDJdb across four viral targets using multi-observable testing (power-law exponent, Shannon entropy, public clonotype fraction) with Bonferroni-corrected thresholds. ResultsThe neutral null model successfully reproduced three independent benchmarks. Public clonotype fraction in VDJdb (3.10%) significantly exceeded neutral predictions (1.47%{+/-}0.29%, 100th percentile, p < 0.001, Cohens d = 5.62), inconsistent with neutrality at stringent thresholds (Bonferroni ' = 0.0167). In contrast, power-law exponent ( = 2.450 vs. 2.391 {+/-} 0.177, p = 0.739, d = 0.33) and Shannon entropy (H = 12.10 vs. 12.34 {+/-} 1.17 bits, p = 0.838, d = -0.21) showed negligible deviations. This dissociation--public fraction deviates while diversity metrics remain neutral-consistent--is consistent with but does not prove selective enrichment for cross-individual TCR convergence. Supplementary analyses confirmed public enrichment is temporally stable (2009-2024, no significant trend p > 0.40) and universal across viral pathogens (CMV, EBV, Influenza, SARS-CoV-2, ANOVA p > 0.68), constraining plausible curation bias mechanisms. ConclusionsWe present a rigorous falsificationist framework for testing neutrality in TCR repertoires via pre-validated computational nulls, multi-observable comparisons, and honest power reporting. Application to VDJdb reveals public clonotype patterns suggestive of non-neutral processes (functional selection or curation bias), establishing testable hypotheses for experimental follow-up. The framework--emphasizing independent validation, pre-specified decision criteria, and effect size quantification--generalizes to antibody repertoires, microbiomes, and evolutionary systems requiring mechanistic discrimination between drift and selection. Author SummaryDetermining whether T-cell receptor occurrence patterns arise from random drift or functional selection is fundamental to understanding adaptive immunity, yet current approaches rely on descriptive statistics rather than rigorous hypothesis testing. We developed the first falsifiable framework for testing neutrality in TCR databases using a biologically realistic computational null model validated against independent empirical benchmarks. Applying this framework to VDJdb, we find that public clonotype frequencies (sequences appearing across many individuals) deviate significantly from neutral predictions, while overall repertoire diversity remains consistent with neutrality. This pattern suggests--but does not definitively prove--that selection or curation bias operates specifically on cross-individual TCR convergence. Our contribution is methodological: we demonstrate how to test mechanistic hypotheses rigorously rather than describe patterns phenomenologically. The framework is immediately applicable to ongoing debates in repertoire immunology and generalizes to other biological systems exhibiting heavy-tailed distributions.

bioinformatics↗