Biology subjects

Zambrano-Mila, M. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Zambrano-Mila, M. S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

HM-DyadCap - Capture and Mapping of 5-Hydroxymethyl-cytosine/5-Methylcytosine CpG Dyads in Mammalian DNA

5-Methylcytosine (mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (hmC) are the main epigenetic modifications of mammalian DNA, and play crucial roles in cell differentiation, development, and tumorigenesis. Both modifications co-exist with unmodified cytosine in palindromic CpG dyads in different symmetric and asymmetric combinations across the two DNA strands, each having unique regulatory potential. To facilitate investigating the individual functions of such dyad modifications, we report HM-DyadCap. This method employs an evolved methyl-CpG-binding domain (MECP2 HM) for the direct capture and sequencing of DNA fragments containing the CpG dyad hmC/mC. Binding studies reveal a high discrimination of MECP2 HM against off-target dinucleotides. We conduct comparative mapping experiments for mESC genomes with HM-DyadCap, standard MethylCap employing wild type MECP2, as well as MeDIP and hMeDIP protocols. We find that MECP2 HM is blocked by hmC glucosylation, and conduct control enrichments with glucosylated genomes that indicate highly selective enrichment of hmC/mC dyads by MECP2 HM. Metagene profiles correlate hmC/mC marks with actively transcribed genes, and reveal global enrichment in gene bodies as well as depletion at transcription start sites. We anticipate that HM-DyadCap will enable effective enrichment and mapping of hmC/mC marks with broad applicability for unravelling the function of this dyad in chromatin biology and cancer.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2023

Dissecting the basis for differential substrate specificity of ADAR1 and ADAR2

Millions of adenosines are deaminated throughout the transcriptome by ADAR1 and ADAR2, modulating double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) immunogenicity and recoding mRNA. The high variability in the susceptibility of different adenosines to editing begs the question of what are the determinants of substrate specificity. Here, we systematically monitor how secondary structure modulates ADAR2 vs ADAR1 substrate selectivity, on the basis of systematic probing of thousands of synthetic sequences transfected into ADAR1-deleted cell lines exogenously expressing either ADAR2 or ADAR1. In both cases, structural disruptions gave rise to symmetric, strand-specific induced editing at a fixed offset, but of varying length: -26 nt for ADAR2, and -35 nt for ADAR1. We dissect the basis for the differences in offset between ADAR1 and ADAR2 via diverse mutants, domain-swaps, and ADAR evolutionary homologs, and reveal that it is encoded by the differential RNA binding domain architecture. We demonstrate that this offset-enhanced editing can allow an improved design of ADAR2-recruiting therapeutics, with proof-of-concept experiments suggestive of increased on-target and potentially decreased off-target editing. Our findings provide novel insight into the determinants guiding ADAR2 substrate selectivity and into the roles of the RNA binding domains of ADAR1 and ADAR2 in mediating differential targeting, and should facilitate the design of improved ADAR-recruiting therapeutics.

biochemistry↗