Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Zajitschek, F.

Publications and source records attributed to Zajitschek, F..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Dietary restriction fails to extend life in stressful environments

Moderate dietary restriction often prolongs life in laboratory animals, and this response has been interpreted as an adaptive strategy that promotes survival during famine. However, dietary restriction can also increase frailty, and it therefore remains unclear whether restricted diets prolong life under stressful conditions like those experienced by wild animals. We manipulated adult dietary protein of Drosophila melanogaster across a gradient of ambient temperature. We found that protein restriction increased longevity of both sexes at benign ambient temperatures (25-27{degrees}C), but failed to extend or even reduced longevity of flies maintained in cold (21-23{degrees}C) or hot (29{degrees}C) conditions. Protein restriction also generally reduced reproductive performance, and did not consistently enhance performance of F1, F2 or F3 descendants. Our results challenge the long-held idea that extended longevity of diet-restricted laboratory animals represents an adaptive survival strategy in natural populations, and suggest instead that this response is an artefact of benign laboratory conditions.

evolutionary biology↗

Sex-specific effects of developmental density on life history and age-dependent flight traits

The environment organisms experience during development can have effects which carry over into their adult lives. These developmental environments may not only affect adult traits at a given point in time, but also how these traits change with age. Generally, stressful developmental environments can lead to sub-optimal adult fitness traits and a faster deterioration of these traits with age. But whether these environments affect how performance traits change with age or whether they affect males and females differently lacks evidence. Here, we test the sex-specific effects of crowding during development on life history traits such as lifespan, fecundity, age-dependent survival, and reproductive senescence, as well as flight performance traits, in the seed beetle-Callosobruchus maculatus. We show that although developmental crowding has no effect on flight performance of either sex, on male adult lifespan, or on female age-dependant survival, it is detrimental to female lifespan and fecundity, as well as female age-dependent reproduction. Additionally, we show that flight traits can change with age and differ between males and females, which may be reflective of sex-specific life-histories and behaviour. Our study has implications for understanding how developmental environments affect life history and behavioural strategies of both males and females.

evolutionary biology↗

Sex and Power: sexual dimorphism in trait variability and its eco-evolutionary and statistical implications

Biomedical and clinical sciences are experiencing a renewed interest in the fact that males and females differ in many anatomic, physiological, and behavioral traits. Sex differences in trait variability, however, are yet to receive similar recognition. In medical science, mammalian females are assumed to have higher trait variability due to estrous cycles (the estrus-mediated variability hypothesis); historically in biomedical research, females have been excluded for this reason. Contrastingly, evolutionary theory and associated data support the greater male variability hypothesis. Here, we test these competing hypotheses in 218 traits measured in >26,900 mice, using meta-analysis methods. Neither hypothesis could universally explain patterns in trait variability. Sex-bias in variability was trait-dependent. While greater male variability was found in morphological traits, females were much more variable in immunological traits. Sex-specific variability has eco-evolutionary ramifications including sex-dependent responses to climate change, as well as statistical implications including power analysis considering sex difference in variance.

evolutionary biology↗

Costs and benefits of giant sperm and sperm storage organs in Drosophila melanogaster

In the Drosophila lineage, both sperm and the primary female sperm storage organ, the seminal receptacle (SR), may reach extraordinary lengths. In D. melanogaster, long SRs bias fertilization toward long sperm during the displacement stage of sperm competition. This sperm-SR interaction, together with a genetic correlation between the traits, suggests that the coevolution of exaggerated sperm and SR lengths may be driven by Fisherian runaway selection. To further understand the costs and benefits of long sperm and SR genotypes in both sexes, we measured male and female fitness in inbred lines of D. melanogaster derived from four populations previously selected for long sperm, short sperm, long SRs, or short SRs. We specifically asked: do long SRs impose costs or benefits on the females that bear them? Do genotypes that generate long sperm in males impose a fitness cost on females sharing those genotypes? Is long sperm an honest indicator of male viability and associated with increased fitness? And finally, are the benefits of long sperm restricted to competitive fertilization success, or do long-sperm males also have increased mating success and fecundity in single matings? We found that both sexes have increased longevity in long sperm and long SR genotypes, with fewer reproduction-related benefits and evidence for trade-offs in males, compared to females. Our results suggest that sperm length and SR length are both indicators of increased viability.

evolutionary biology↗