Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Yu, C. W.

Publications and source records attributed to Yu, C. W..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

RNA-binding proteins provide specificity to the PAN2-PAN3 mRNA deadenylation complex

Cytoplasmic shortening of mRNA poly(A) tails represses eukaryotic gene expression by inhibiting efficient translation and committing an mRNA to decay. The CCR4-NOT deadenylase machinery interacts with sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), termed RNA adaptors, to target specific transcripts for deadenylation. In contrast, the PAN2-PAN3 deadenylation complex is thought to be predominantly recruited to mRNAs via interaction with the poly(A) binding protein, raising the question of whether it acts in a transcript-specific manner. Here, using biochemical reconstitution, we show that PAN2-PAN3 can also be recruited to specific RNAs via RNA adaptors, including MEX3, YTHDF and ZFP36 proteins. In cells, we find that a diverse range of RNA adaptors interact with both major deadenylation complexes. Thus, our data suggest that, in addition to CCR4-NOT, PAN2-PAN3 also contributes to the specificity of mRNA degradation and the robustness of post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression.

molecular biology↗

Phosphorylation-dependent tuning of mRNA deadenylation rates

mRNA decay is a major determinant of gene regulation that is controlled through shortening of mRNA poly(A) tails by the Ccr4-Not complex. The specificity of deadenylation can be mediated through RNA adaptors - RNA-binding proteins that tether substrate mRNAs to Ccr4-Not in a regulated and context-specific manner. Interaction with Ccr4-Not is mediated by intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) within the RNA adaptors. Due to the difficulty in studying large IDR-containing complexes, the determinants of specificity and their regulation remain unclear. Here we use structural biology and biochemical reconstitution to show that dispersed segments within IDRs of RNA adaptors bind to several distinct binding sites on Ccr4-Not through multivalent interactions. We further demonstrate that binding can be modulated by phosphorylation, altering the consequent deadenylation rate in a continuously tunable manner. This mechanism is broadly applicable in evolutionarily divergent IDRs from multiple RNA adaptors including fission yeast Puf3, and human Pumilio/PUM1 and Tristetraprolin/TTP. Together, our work suggests that multivalent interactions and phosphorylation represent conserved strategies for regulating gene expression. Thus, in response to cellular cues, mRNA decay can be regulated by a graded mechanism, rather than a bistable on/off switch, rationalizing how post-transcriptional gene expression is fine-tuned.

molecular biology↗

Juxtaposition of Bub1 and Cdc20 on phosphorylated Mad1 during catalytic mitotic checkpoint complex assembly

In response to improper kinetochore-microtubule attachments in mitosis, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) assembles the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) to inhibit the anaphase- promoting complex/cyclosome, thereby delaying entry into anaphase. The MCC is a complex of Mad2, Cdc20 and BubR1:Bub3. Its assembly is catalysed by unattached kinetochores on a catalytic Mad1:Mad2 platform. Mad1-bound closed-Mad2 (C-Mad2) recruits open-Mad2 (O- Mad2) through self-dimerization. This interaction, combined with Mps1 kinase-mediated phosphorylation of Bub1 and Mad1, accelerates MCC assembly, in a process that requires conversion of O-Mad2 to C-Mad2 and concomitant binding of Cdc20. How Mad1 phosphorylation catalyses MCC assembly is poorly understood. In this study we characterized Mps1 phosphorylation of Mad1 and obtained structural insights into a phosphorylation-specific Mad1:Cdc20 interaction. This interaction, together with the Mps1-phosphorylation dependent association of Bub1 and Mad1, generates a tripartite assembly of Bub1 and Cdc20 onto the C- terminal domain of Mad1 (Mad1CTD). We additionally identified a folded state of the Mad1:Mad2 complex that suggests how the Cdc20:Mad1CTD interaction brings the Mad2- interacting motif (MIM) of Cdc20 (Cdc20MIM) into close proximity with O-Mad2. We also show that Cdc20MIM is sufficient to catalyse Mad2 conversion and its entrapment by the Mad2 safety- belt. Thus, Mps1-dependent formation of the MCC-assembly scaffold functions to position and orient Cdc20MIM near O-Mad2, thereby catalysing formation of C-Mad2:Cdc20.

biochemistry↗

The bacterial actin-like cell division protein FtsA forms curved antiparallel double filaments upon binding of FtsN

Cell growth and division of walled bacteria depend on the synthesis and remodelling of peptidoglycan (PG). These activities are carried out by two multiprotein complexes, the elongasome and the divisome during cell elongation and division, respectively. Filaments of tubulin-like FtsZ form the cytoplasmic scaffold for divisome assembly, the Z-ring. In E. coli, the actin homologue FtsA anchors the Z-ring to the membrane and recruits downstream divisome components, including bitopic FtsN. FtsN is recruited late and activates the periplasmic PG synthase FtsWI. To start unravelling the activation mechanism involving FtsA and FtsN, we showed that E. coli FtsA forms antiparallel double filaments on lipid monolayers when also binding FtsNs cytoplasmic tail, and that Vibrio maritimus FtsA crystallised as an equivalent double filament. We structurally located the FtsA-FtsN interaction site in FtsAs IA-IC interdomain cleft and confirmed FtsA double filament formation in vivo using site-specific cysteine cross-linking. FtsA-FtsN double filaments reconstituted on and in liposomes preferred negative Gaussian curvature, as was previously shown for the elongasomes actin, MreB. MreB filaments serve as curvature-sensing "rudders", orienting insertion of PG around the cells circumference. We propose that curved antiparallel FtsA double filaments function similarly in the divisome: FtsA filaments, together with dynamic FtsZ filaments orient and concentrate cell-constricting septal PG synthesis in the division plane.

microbiology↗

Dynamics in Fip1 regulate eukaryotic mRNA 3'-end processing

Cleavage and polyadenylation factor (CPF/CPSF) is a multiprotein complex essential for mRNA 3-end processing in eukaryotes. It contains an endonuclease that cleaves pre-mRNAs, and a polymerase that adds a poly(A) tail onto the cleaved 3-end. Several CPF subunits, including Fip1, contain intrinsically-disordered regions (IDRs). IDRs within multiprotein complexes can be flexible, or can become ordered upon interaction with binding partners. Here, we show that yeast Fip1 anchors the poly(A) polymerase Pap1 onto CPF via an interaction with zinc finger 4 of another CPF subunit, Yth1. We also reconstitute a fully recombinant 850-kDa CPF. By incorporating selectively-labelled Fip1 into recombinant CPF, we could study the dynamics of this single protein within the megadalton complex using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR). This reveals that a Fip1 IDR that connects the Yth1- and Pap1-binding sites remains highly dynamic within CPF. Together, our data suggest that Fip1 dynamics mediate conformational transitions within the 3-end processing machinery to coordinate cleavage and polyadenylation.

molecular biology↗

Drawing the Borders of Olfactory Space

In studies of vision and audition, stimuli can be chosen to span the visible or audible spectrum; in olfaction, the axes and boundaries defining the analogous odorous space are unknown. As a result, the population of olfactory space is likewise unknown, and anecdotal estimates of 10,000 odorants have endured. The journey a molecule must take to reach olfactory receptors (OR) and produce an odor percept suggests some chemical criteria for odorants: a molecule must be 1) volatile enough to enter the air phase, 2) non-volatile and hydrophilic enough to sorb into the mucous layer coating the olfactory epithelium, 3) hydrophobic enough to enter an OR binding pocket, and 4) activate at least one OR. Here, we developed a simple and interpretable quantitative model that reliably predicts if a molecule is odorous or odorless based solely on the first three criteria. Applying our model to a database of all possible small organic molecules, we estimate that over 30 billion possible compounds are odorous, 6 orders of magnitude larger than current estimates of 10,000. With this model in hand, we can define the boundaries of olfactory space in terms of molecular volatility and hydrophobicity, enabling representative sampling of olfactory stimulus space.

neuroscience↗

Reverse-engineering human olfactory perception from chemical features of odor molecules

Despite 25 years of progress in understanding the molecular mechanisms of olfaction, it is still not possible to predict whether a given molecule will have a perceived odor, or what olfactory percept it will produce. To address this stimulus-percept problem for olfaction, we organized the crowd-sourced DREAM Olfaction Prediction Challenge. Working from a large olfactory psychophysical dataset, teams developed machine learning algorithms to predict sensory attributes of molecules based on their chemoinformatic features. The resulting models predicted odor intensity and pleasantness with high accuracy, and also successfully predicted eight semantic descriptors (\"garlic\", \"fish\", \"sweet\", \"fruit\", \"burnt\", \"spices\", \"flower\", \"sour\"). Regularized linear models performed nearly as well as random-forest-based approaches, with a predictive accuracy that closely approaches a key theoretical limit. The models presented here make it possible to predict the perceptual qualities of virtually any molecule with an impressive degree of accuracy to reverse-engineer the smell of a molecule.\n\nOne Sentence SummaryResults of a crowdsourcing competition show that it is possible to accurately predict and reverse-engineer the smell of a molecule.

neuroscience↗