Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Yost, R. T.

Publications and source records attributed to Yost, R. T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Recovery from social isolation requires dopamine in males, but not the autism-related gene nlg3 in either sex

Social isolation causes profound changes in social behaviour in a variety of species including humans, monkeys, mice, bees, and vinegar flies. However, the genetic and molecular mechanisms modulating behavioural responses to both social isolation and social recovery remain to be elucidated. In this study, we quantified the behavioural response of vinegar flies to social isolation through the use of two distinct protocols, one involving flies social space preference and the other assessing flies sociability, defined as their spontaneous tendencies to form groups. We found that social isolation increased social space and reduced sociability. These effects of social isolation, however, were reversible and could be reduced after 3 days of group housing. Flies with a loss of function of neuroligin3 (ortholog of autism-related neuroligin genes) with known increased social space in a socially enriched environment, were still able to recover from social isolation. Using a UAS-TH-RNAi driven in all neurons, we show that dopamine is important for a response to social isolation and recovery in males but not in females. Furthermore, only in males, dopamine levels are reduced after isolation and are not recovered after group housing. Finally, in socially enriched flies with a loss of function of neuroligin3, dopamine levels are reduced in males, but not in females. We propose a model to explain how dopamine and neuroligin3 are involved in the behavioural response to social isolation and its recovery in a dynamic and sex-specific manner.

neuroscience↗

Is Drosophila melanogaster Stress Odorant (dSO) really an alarm pheromone?

Social interactions are crucial for the reproduction and survival of many organisms, including those using visual, auditory and olfactory cues to signal the presence of danger. Drosophila melanogaster emits an olfactory alarm signal, termed the Drosophila stress odorant (dSO) in response to mechanical agitation or electric shock, and conspecifics avoid areas previously occupied by stressed individuals. However, the contextual, genetic and neural underpinnings of the emission of, and response to dSO, have received little attention. Using a binary choice assay, we determined that neither age and sex of emitters, nor the time of the day, affected the emission or avoidance of dSO. However, both sex and mating status affected the response to dSO. We also demonstrated that dSO was not species specific so it should not be considered a pheromone but a general alarm signal for Drosophila. However, the response levels to both intra and inter-specific cues differed between species and possible reasons for these differences are discussed. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIEmission of dSO, a highly volatile chemical blend emitted by stressed flies, is not context specific C_LIO_LIResponse to dSO is context specific, affected by factors such as age and mating status. C_LIO_LIAs flies respond to volatiles for stressed heterospecifics, dSO should not be considered an alarm pheromone, but as an alarm cue. C_LI

animal behavior and cognition↗