Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Yogarajah, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Yogarajah, M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Delineating the heartbeat-evoked potential from cardiac artefact

Introduction The heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) is widely interpreted as an EEG/MEG marker of cortical processing of cardiac afferent signals. It is superimposed on electrical and mechanical signals generated by the heartbeat. Because the neural response and cardiac artefact share the same trigger, conventional averaging and blind-source correction lack an observable cardiac-only reference. Methods We used clinically acquired EEGs with isoelectric-appearing cerebral activity and preserved cardiac activity as a negative control for non-neural heartbeat-locked scalp signal. Thirty-nine isoelectric participants were compared with 118 heart-rate-matched participants whose clinical EEGs were reported as normal. Participant-level heartbeat averages were analysed using covariate-adjusted spatiotemporal permutation tests. We characterised interindividual cardiac-artefact morphology and tested the primary group contrast across average-reference, surface-Laplacian and cardiac-artefact-directed ICA analyses, with pseudotrial correction for heartbeat-independent EEG activity. Results Cardiac-artefact morphology varied markedly across isoelectric participants and was predominantly posterior or posterolateral. In the prespecified primary analysis, controls showed a negative frontocentral cluster persisted at 90-365 ms, p=.016, and a posterior cluster at 145-310 ms, p=.03. The topography of the first cluster aligns with the spatiotemporal characteristics of the early window of the HEP as identified in the literature. This cluster was negative in polarity at the scalp. This suggests positive voltage changes in the early HEP are in fact reductions in HEP activity. Exploratory analyses explored the effects of montage, and artefact correction with independent component analysis to remove CA. There was no significant group difference in ECG. Conclusion These findings provide an important first empirical scalp-level dissociation of the early HEP from CA using an inversion-of-ground-truth approach. A robustly observed cluster of difference, consistent with the early HEP, suggests that this part of the HEP is a distinct, frontocentral, negative cortical response.

neuroscience↗

Can the heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) be separated from Cardiac Artefact (CA) using beamforming?

The heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP), a cortical response to heartbeats and neural marker of interoception, is clinically relevant but heavily contaminated by scalp cardiac-artefact (CA), making reliable distinction challenging. Because HEP and cardiac potentials are anatomically distinct, they may be separable via beamforming, a source localisation method isolating brain activity while suppressing external interference. Here, the first known validation of EEG beamforming for HEP source reconstruction was attempted, quantifying waveform recovery and spatial accuracy using simulated data. Linearly constrained minimal variance (LCMV) beamforming was used (A) to test signal recovery, 128-channel EEG was simulated for three models with known HEP waveforms: (1) a single right insula (R-Ins) HEP; (2) temporally distinct HEPs in R-Ins and right anterior cingulate cortex (R-ACC); (3) overlapping HEPs in both regions. Recovery was assessed by correlating reconstructed and known waveforms. (B) To test CA suppression, CA from brain-dead isoelectric EEGs was integrated to simulations, with varying source (-10-50dB) and sensor (0-30dB) signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). (C) To analyse empirical EEG from hypertensive and anxiety individuals (n=106). Null-space projection, using subject-specific QRS waveforms and its temporal derivative, removed residual CA in source waveforms. In model-1, beamforming achieved near-perfect recovery without CA (r>0.99, error=0mm) at -30dB source SNR, remaining robust in the presence of CA (r=0.72-0.94, error=0-5.7mm) but degrading below -20dB (r<0.3, error=27mm). Models 2 and 3 showed similar recovery but introduced R-ACC-to-R-Ins leakage. In empirical data, beamforming revealed significant HEP activity in R-Ins and R-ACC (p<0.001). A significant late R-ACC HEP difference (250-500ms post-R-peak) between hypertension and controls emerged after excluding low-SNR subjects and strengthened following QRS cleaning (p=0.035, d=0.96). LCMV beamforming reliably recovers simulated HEPs while suppressing CA given sufficient SNR. Applied empirically, beamforming detected clinically meaningful group differences in interoceptive regions (R-Ins/R-ACC), offering a source-level approach to separate HEP from CA that complements sensor-level methods.

neuroscience↗

Methodological approaches to derive the heartbeat-evoked potential: pastpractices and future recommendations

The heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) is an implicit, electrophysiological marker of cortical heartbeat processing and interoception, with increasing clinical relevance. However, on the scalp, HEP are low-amplitude signals mixed with cardiac field artefacts (CFA), requiring signal processing pipelines to separate HEP from CFA. This review evaluates current analytical approaches, addresses methodological gaps in HEP pipelines, and examines the impact of key parameter choices. HEP processing methods/parameters used in EEG (N=101) and MEG (N=10) studies were investigated, focusing on the effects of HEP window, electrodes, filters, independent component analysis (ICA) and artefact subspace reconstruction (ASR), on HEP extraction, using Temple Universitys normal scalp EEG data. EEG and MEG studies revealed clear inconsistencies in HEP parameter use and reporting. ASR-20 (ASR threshold for artifact identification) performed comparably to ICA for artefact removal, supporting its potential real-time EEG applicability. Epoch rejection, a HEP quality metric, appeared equivalent between ICA and ASR-20 after artefact removal. Linear Mixed Model analysis identified significant effects of RR interval, maximum epoch amplitude, HEP window and baseline correction start time on measured HEP amplitude. Publications should report critical values for reliable HEP extraction, emphasising the need for standardised methods to enhance study comparability and reproducibility.

neuroscience↗