Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Yo, M. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Yo, M. S..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Humoral immunity induced by LP.8.1 monovalent vaccines against a broad range of SARS-CoV-2 variants including XEC, NB.1.8.1, XFG, and BA.3.2

In the spring of 2025, multiple SARS-CoV-2 Omicron JN.1 subvariants were circulating, with LP.8.1 among the major variants. Pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna, and Novavax/Takeda adopted monovalent LP.8.1 for their 2025-2026 season vaccines, following recommendations issued by the WHO in May 2025. As of November 2025, SARS-CoV-2 variants including LP.8.1, XEC, NB.1.8.1, and XFG--all designated as variants under monitoring--were circulating. In terms of the spike gene, these recent variants as well as LP.8.1 are derived from JN.1. Moreover, BA.3.2, a BA.3 descendant with multiple mutations in the spike gene, has recently emerged and exhibits robust immune evasion. In Japan, the rollout of the LP.8.1-based vaccination has progressed since the end of September 2025. We previously reported the humoral immunity induced by the XBB.1.5-based monovalent vaccine in 2023 and the JN.1-based monovalent vaccine in 2024 in the Japanese population. Here, we investigated the efficiency of humoral immunity induced by two LP.8.1-based vaccines, the mRNA vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech and the recombinant protein-based vaccine from Novavax/Takeda, in Japan. We performed neutralization assays using sera obtained from individuals who received the LP.8.1 mRNA vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech (N=29) or the LP.8.1 recombinant protein vaccine from Novavax/Takeda (N=20) with pseudoviruses harboring spike proteins of B.1.1, BA.5, XBB.1.5, JN.1, LP.8.1, XEC, NB.1.8.1, XFG and BA.3.2. In both mRNA and protein-based vaccinee groups, the change in 50% neutralizing titer (NT50) against variants that were predominant before JN.1 (i.e., B.1.1, BA.5 and XBB.1.5) were smaller than those against JN.1 and its subvariants, including LP.8.1, XEC, NB.1.8.1 and XFG. Consistent with recent studies, neutralizing antibodies against BA.3.2 were induced by both vaccines. However, the induction fold change of BA.3.2 was smaller than those of JN.1 and its subvariants. Next, we tested humoral immune response of participants who received both JN.1-based vaccine in 2024 and LP.8.1-based vaccine in 2025 (N=15). Approximately a year after the JN.1-based vaccination, neutralization titer has waned against all variants tested. However, when we compare the NT50s of pre-vaccination sera between 2025 and 2024, those in 2025 against all variants except for B.1.1 were significantly higher than those last year. This suggests that the cross-neutralizing antibodies induced by JN.1-based vaccination were still maintained for a year. Furthermore, the neutralization abilities against the JN.1 sublineages tested and BA.3.2 were significantly reboosted after the LP.8.1-based vaccination. Our study shows immune boosting by the LP.8.1-based vaccine is effective in achieving cross-neutralization against a broad range of JN.1 sublineages in a JN.1-naive population and in recalling waning humoral immunity against these subvariants.

microbiology↗

Genetic diversity in horseshoe bat ACE2 and sarbecovirus spike proteins mutually shape one another

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) serves as the entry receptor for a wide diversity of sarbecoviruses naturally harboured by horseshoe bats (genus Rhinolophus). Despite the extensive circulation of these viruses in many horseshoe bat species, the potential interactions between virus and receptor evolution remain poorly understood. We sampled individuals of the intermediate horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus affinis) across Vietnam and identified 15 genotypes of ACE2 proteins, 10 of which are previously unreported. Phylogenetic analysis and infectivity assays with a panel of 36 sarbecovirus spike proteins indicated that the R. affinis ACE2 phylogeny has geographic structuring and genotypes originating from different geographic regions exhibit distinct infectivity phenotypes. We detected site-specific positive selection on ACE2 site 24 with the associated substitutions largely affecting the receptors sarbecovirus infectivity profile. Together, our findings suggest that the R. affinis within-species ACE2 diversity has likely been shaped through selection by past sarbecovirus infection. Similarly on the virus end, we use mutagenesis assays and structural analysis through cryo-EM, to delineate the proximal evolution of the Ra22QT77 spike defined by specialization to the ACE2 genotypes of horseshoe bats found in and near southern Vietnam, where the virus was sampled. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of host-sarbecovirus co-evolution dynamics and provide valuable insights into the receptor usage determinants of these viruses. HighlightsO_LIWe identify a total of 15 ACE2 genotypes in R. affinis bats from Vietnam. C_LIO_LIACE2 intraspecific polymorphism is geographically separated and associated with distinct sarbecovirus infectivity. C_LIO_LISite 24 of R. affinis ACE2 experiences positive selection and controls susceptibility to sarbecoviruses. C_LIO_LIBat ACE2s and sarbecovirus spikes are bidirectionally shaped by each others evolution. C_LI

microbiology↗

Genetic diversity of pangolin coronaviruses reveals a key immuno-evasive substitution at spike residue 519

Malayan pangolins are unprecedented hosts for several SARS-CoV-2-related coronaviruses, which have previously been known to only infect Rhinolophus bats. Much debate has hence surrounded their possible role as intermediate hosts in the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, but the virological phenotypes of most pangolin coronaviruses (pCoVs) remain unclear. Here, we comprehensively analyze all pCoVs to date identified from trafficked pangolins seized in the Guangdong province of China, which are remarkably similar to SARS-CoV-2 in the spike protein. We explore an unknown genetic diversity within these viruses and uncover how this diversity translates to different virological phenotypes. Strikingly, several Guangdong pCoVs harbor a lysine substitution at residue 519 of spike protein, which contributes to marked immune evasion potentially by modulating the conformational state of spike protein. Furthermore, we highlight that a similar immuno-evasive mutation at residue 519 of the spike protein was acquired by SARS-CoV-2. These findings support that pangolin- and human-infecting coronaviruses represent independent spillover events from natural bat reservoirs, and that immuno-evasive mutations at residue 519 may be a common vector of viral evolution in coronaviruses that infect non-bat hosts.

microbiology↗

Molecular basis of sarbecovirus evolution and receptor tropism in natural hosts, potential intermediate hosts, and humans

The spike protein of many sarbecoviruses binds to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor and facilitates viral entry. The diversification of the sarbecovirus spike gene and the mammalian ACE2 gene suggests that sarbecoviruses and their hosts have co-evolved, and the genetic diversity in these genes affects the host tropism of sarbecoviruses. Better comprehending the evolutionary potential of sarbecoviruses can lead to preparedness for the next pandemic. However, the host tropism of sarbecoviruses is not fully understood. Here, we performed round-robin pseudovirus infection assays using 53 sarbecoviruses and ACE2s from 17 mammals to elucidate the ACE2 tropism of sarbecoviruses in natural hosts, potential intermediate hosts and humans. We determined the factors responsible for the ACE2 tropism of sarbecoviruses through structural, phylogenetic analyses, and infection experiments, revealing which substitutions can expand the host range of sarbecoviruses. These results highlight the mechanisms modulating host tropism throughout sarbecovirus evolution.

microbiology↗

Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 KP.3, LB.1 and KP.2.3 variants

The SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 variant, arising from BA.2.86.1 with a substitution in the spike (S) protein, S:L455S, exhibited increased fitness and outcompeted the previously predominant XBB lineages by the beginning of 2024. Subsequently, JN.1 subvariants including KP.2 and KP.3, which convergently acquired S protein substitutions such as S:R346T, S:F456L, and S:Q493E, have emerged concurrently. Furthermore, JN.1 subvariants such as LB.1 and KP.2.3, which convergently acquired S:S31del in addition to the above substitutions, have emerged and spread as of June 2024. Here we investigated the virological properties of KP.3, LB.1 and KP.2.3. We estimated the relative effective reproduction number (Re) of KP.3, LB.1, and KP.2.3 using a Bayesian multinomial logistic model based on the genome surveillance data from Canada, the UK, and the USA, where these variants have spread from March to April 2024. The Re of KP.3 is more than 1.2-fold higher than that of JN.1 and higher than or comparable to that of KP.2 in these countries. Importantly, the Re values of LB.1 and KP.2.3 are even higher than those of KP.2 and KP.3. These results suggest that the three variants we investigated herein, particularly LB.1, and KP.2.3, will become major circulating variants worldwide in addition to KP.2 and KP.3. The pseudovirus infectivity of KP.2 and KP.3 was significantly lower than that of JN.1. On the other hand, the pseudovirus infectivity of LB.1 and KP.2.3 was comparable to that of JN.1. Neutralization assay was conducted by using four types of breakthrough infection (BTI) sera with XBB.1.5, EG.5, HK.3 and JN.1 infections as well as monovalent XBB.1.5 vaccine sera. In all four groups of BTI sera tested, the 50% neutralization titers (NT50) against LB.1 and KP.2.3 were significantly lower than those against JN.1 (2.2-3.3-fold and 2.0-2.9-fold) and even lower than those against KP.2 (1.6-1.9-fold and 1.4-1.7 fold). Although KP.3 exhibited neutralization resistance against all BTI sera tested than JN.1 (1.6-2.2-fold) with statistical significance, there were no significant differences between KP.3 and KP.2. In the case of infection-naive XBB.1.5 vaccine sera, the NT50 values of JN.1 subvariants were very low. In the case of XBB.1.5 vaccine sera after natural XBB infection, the NT50 values against KP.3, LB.1 and KP.2.3 were significantly lower than those of JN.1 (2.1-2.8-fold) and even lower than KP.2 after infection (1.4-2.0-fold). Overall, our results suggest that the S substitutions convergently acquired in the JN.1 subvariants contribute to immune evasion, and therefore, increase their Re when compared to parental JN.1. More importantly, LB.1 and KP.2.3 exhibited higher pseudovirus infectivity and more robust immune resistance than KP.2. These data suggest that S:S31del is critical to exhibit increased infectivity, increased immune evasion, and therefore, potentially contributes to increased Re.

microbiology↗