Yates, M. C. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2020

Single generation exposure to a captive diet: a primer for domestication selection in a salmonid fish?

Millions of wild animals in captivity are reared on diets that differ in their uptake and composition from natural conditions. Few studies have investigated whether such novel diets elicit unintentional domestication selection in captive rearing and supplementation programs. In highly fecund salmonid fishes, natural and captive mortality is highest in the first few months of exogenous feeding. This high early mortality might be a potent driver of unintentional selection because wild fish normally forage on live prey whereas they are fed almost exclusively pellet feed in captivity: fish that do not adapt pellet feed well under captive conditions experience reduced growth and/or die. We tested this hypothesis by generating a large number of families from F1 captive and wild fish originating from the same three populations and then rearing them each on pellet and natural, live, drifting feed for three months at the beginning of exogenous feeding. We found that captive fish of every population grew faster than wild fish in all diet treatments. Populations exhibited an idiosyncratic response to diet treatment, with two populations exhibiting faster growth on a pellet diet versus the natural diet but another population exhibiting similar growth in both diet treatments. Fish exposed to a natural diet also exhibited higher survival relative to those given a pellet diet. Captive and wild fish did not differ in survival, regardless of population of origin. Overall, we found evidence that rapid domestication selection associated with a single generation exposure to a novel captive diet generates genetically-based changes to individual fitness (e.g., growth and survival) in a wild fish.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Allometric scaling strengthens the relationship between eDNA particle concentration and organism abundance in nature

Organism abundance is a critical parameter in ecology, but its estimation is often challenging. Approaches utilizing eDNA to indirectly estimate abundance have recently generated substantial interest. However, preliminary correlations observed between eDNA concentration and abundance in nature are typically moderate in strength with significant unexplained variation. Here we apply a novel approach to integrate allometric scaling coefficients into models of eDNA concentration and organism abundance. We hypothesize that eDNA particle production scales non-linearly with mass, with scaling coefficients < 1. Wild populations often exhibit substantial variation in individual body size distributions; we therefore predict that the distribution of mass across individuals within a population will influence population-level eDNA production rates. To test our hypothesis, we collected standardized body size distribution and mark-recapture abundance data using whole-lake experiments involving nine populations of brook trout. We correlated eDNA concentration with three metrics of abundance: density (individuals/ha), biomass (kg/ha), and allometrically scaled mass (ASM) ({sum}(individual mass0.73)/ha). Density and biomass were both significantly positively correlated with eDNA concentration (adj. R2 = 0.59 and 0.63, respectively), but ASM exhibited improved model fit (adj. R2 = 0.78). We also demonstrate how estimates of ASM derived from eDNA samples in unknown systems can be converted to biomass or density estimates with additional size structure data. Future experiments should empirically validate allometric scaling coefficients for eDNA production, particularly where substantial intraspecific size distribution variation exists. Incorporating allometric scaling may improve predictive models to the extent that eDNA concentration may become a reliable indicator of abundance in nature.

ecology↗