Biology subjects

Yakushiji-Kaminatsui, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Yakushiji-Kaminatsui, N..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

SPIN1 selectively silences evolutionarily young transposable elements through chromatin regulation

Mammalian genomes encode multiple transposable element (TE) silencing pathways that distinguish their targets through different molecular features, with KRAB zinc finger proteins recognizing DNA sequence, the HUSH complex sensing intronless transcripts, and the PIWI-piRNA pathway using small RNA guides. How chromatin state itself contributes to TE recognition remains less defined. Here we identify Spindlin1 (SPIN1), a three-Tudor-domain histone reader implicated in germline piRNA-directed DNA methylation, as a transcriptional repressor of evolutionarily young TEs in mouse embryonic stem cells. SPIN1 selectively binds LINE and ERV loci carrying H3K4me3 and H3K9me3, a chromatin signature enriched at young, transcription-permissive elements, and recognition of these marks by Tudor domains 1 and 2 is required for TE targeting. SPIN1 engages SPINDOC as a Tudor 1 and 3-dependent cofactor whose loss phenocopies SPIN1 depletion, and associates with the H3K9 methyltransferases SETDB1 and G9a. SPIN1 loss reduces H3K9me3 and is accompanied by increased chromatin accessibility, without altering DNA methylation. Thus, SPIN1 uses a histone-state-based mechanism to identify and repress young TEs in pluripotent cells, mechanistically distinct from its germline mode in which SPIN1 cooperates with the PIWI-piRNA pathway to promote DNA methylation, illustrating how a single histone reader engages distinct silencing machineries across cellular contexts.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2022

The shh limb enhancer is activated in patterned limb regeneration but not in hypomorphic limb regeneration in Xenopus laevis

Xenopus young tadpoles regenerate a limb with the anteroposterior (AP) pattern, but metamorphosed froglets regenerate a hypomorphic limb after amputation. The key gene for AP patterning, shh, is expressed in a regenerating limb of the tadpole but not in that of the froglet. Genomic DNA in the shh limb-specific enhancer, MFCS1 (ZRS), is hypermethylated in froglets but hypomethylated in tadpoles: shh expression may be controlled by epigenetic regulation of MFCS1. Is MFCS1 specifically activated for regenerating the AP-patterned limb? We generated transgenic Xenopus laevis lines that visualize the MFCS1 enhancer activity with a GFP reporter. The transgenic tadpoles showed GFP expression in hoxd13- and shh-expressing domains of developing and regenerating limbs, whereas the froglets showed no GFP expression in the regenerating limbs despite having hoxd13 expression. Genome sequence analysis and co-transfection assays using cultured cells revealed that Hoxd13 can activate Xenopus MFCS1. These results suggest that MFCS1 activation correlates with regeneration of AP-patterned limbs and that re-activation of epigenetically inactivated MFCS1 would be crucial to confer the ability to non-regenerative animals for regenerating a properly patterned limb.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2020

SPECIFIC ECTODERMAL ENHANCERS CONTROL THE EXPRESSION OF HoxC GENES IN DEVELOPING MAMMALIAN INTEGUMENTS

Vertebrate Hox genes are key players in the establishment of structures during the development of the main body axis. Subsequently, they play important roles either in organizing secondary axial structures such as the appendages, or during homeostasis in postnatal stages and adulthood. Here we set up to analyze their elusive function in the ectodermal compartment, using the mouse limb bud as a model. We report that the HoxC gene cluster was globally co-opted to be transcribed in the distal limb ectoderm, where it is activated following the rule of temporal colinearity. These ectodermal cells subsequently produce various keratinized organs such as nails or claws. Accordingly, deletion of the HoxC cluster led to mice lacking nails (anonychia) and also hairs (alopecia), a condition stronger than the previously reported loss of function of Hoxc13, which is the causative gene of the ectodermal dysplasia 9 (ECTD9) in human patients. We further identified two ectodermal, mammalian-specific enhancers located upstream of the HoxC gene cluster, which act synergistically to regulate Hoxc gene expression in the hair and nail ectodermal organs. Deletion of these regulatory elements alone or in combination revealed a strong quantitative component in the regulation of Hoxc genes in the ectoderm, suggesting that these two enhancers may have evolved along with mammals to provide the level of HOXC proteins necessary for the full development of hairs and nails. Significance StatementIn this study, we report a unique and necessary function for the HoxC gene cluster in the development of some ectodermal organs, as illustrated both by the hair and nail phenotype displayed by mice lacking the Hoxc13 function and by the congenital anonychia (absence of nails) in full HoxC cluster mutants. We show that Hoxc genes are activated in a colinear manner in the embryonic limb ectoderm and are subsequently transcribed in developing nails and hairs. We identify two mammalian-specific enhancers located upstream of the HoxC cluster with and exclusive ectodermal specificity. Individual or combined enhancer deletions suggest that they act in combination to raise the transcription level of several Hoxc genes during hairs and nails development.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2019

IMPACT OF GENOME ARCHITECTURE UPON THE FUNCTIONAL ACTIVATION AND REPRESSION OF Hox REGULATORY LANDSCAPES

BackgroundThe spatial organization of the mammalian genome relies upon the formation of chromatin domains of various scales. At the level of gene regulation in cis, collections of enhancer sequences define large regulatory landscapes that usually match with the presence of topologically associating domains (TADs). These domains are largely determined by bound CTCF molecules and often contain ranges of enhancers displaying similar or related tissue specificity, suggesting that in some cases such domains may act as coherent regulatory units, with a global on or off state.\n\nResultsBy using the HoxD gene cluster as a paradigm, we investigated the effect of large genomic rearrangements affecting the two TADs flanking this locus, including their fusion into a single chromatin domain. We show that, within a single hybrid TAD, the activation of both proximal and distal limb enhancers initially positioned in either TADs globally occurred as when both TADs are intact. We also show that the timely implementation of distal limb enhancers depends on whether or not target genes had previously responded to proximal enhancers, due to the presence or absence of H3K27me3 marks.\n\nConclusionsFrom this work, we conclude that antagonistic limb proximal and distal enhancers can exert their specificities when positioned into the same TAD and in the absence of their genuine target genes. We also conclude that removing these target genes reduced the coverage of a regulatory landscape by chromatin marks associated with silencing and thus prolonged its activity in time. Since Polycomb group proteins are mainly recruited at the Hox gene cluster, our results suggest that Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) can extend its coverage to far-cis regulatory sequences as long as confined to the neighboring TAD structure.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2018

CONSERVATION AND VARIATIONS OF BIMODAL HoxD GENE REGULATION DURING TETRAPOD LIMB DEVELOPMENT

In all tetrapods examined thus far, the development and patterning of limbs require the activation of gene members of the HoxD cluster. In mammals, they are controlled by a complex bimodal regulation, which controls first the proximal patterning, then the distal structure, allowing at the same time the formation of the wrist and ankle articulations. We analyzed the implementation of this regulatory mechanism in chicken, i.e. in an animal where large morphological differences exist between fore-and hindlimbs. We report that while this bimodal regulation is globally conserved between mammals and avian, some important modifications evolved at least between these two model systems, in particular regarding the activity of specific enhancers, the width of the TAD boundary separating the two regulations and the comparison between the forelimb versus hindlimb regulatory controls. Some aspects of these regulations seem to be more conserved between chick and bats than with the mouse situation, which may relate to the extent to which forelimbs and hindlimbs of these various animals differ in their functions.\n\nAUTHOR SUMMARYThe morphologies of limbs largely vary either amongst tetrapod species, or even between the fore-and hindlimbs of the same animal species. In order to try and evaluate whether variations in the complex regulation of Hoxd genes during limb development may contribute to these differences, we compared their transcriptional controls during both fore-and hindlimb buds development in either the mouse, or the chicken embryos. We combined transcriptome analyses with 3D genome conformation, histone modification profiles and mouse genetics and found that the regulatory mechanism underlying Hoxd gene expression was highly conserved in all contexts, though with some clear differences. For instance, we observed a variation in the TAD boundary interval between the mouse and the chick, as well as differences in the activity of a conserved enhancer element (CS93) situated within the T-DOM regulatory landscape. In contrast to the mouse, the chicken enhancer indeed displayed a stronger activity in fore-than in hindlimb buds, coinciding with the observed striking differences in the mRNA levels. Altogether, differences in both the timing and duration of TAD activities and in the width of their boundary may parallel the important decrease in Hoxd gene transcription in chick hindlimb versus forelimb buds. These differences may also account for the slightly distinct regulatory strategies implemented by mammals and birds at this locus, potentially leading to substantial morphological variations.

developmental biology↗