Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Yakovlev, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Yakovlev, L..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Tactile vs Motor Imagery: the Effects on Corticospinal Excitability Assessed with single-pulse TMS

Tactile Imagery (TI) remains a fairly understudied phenomenon despite an increased attention to this topic in recent years. Here we investigated the effects of TI on corticospinal excitability by measuring motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The effects of TI were compared with those of tactile stimulation (TS) and kinesthetic motor imagery (kMI). Twenty-two participants performed three tasks in randomly assigned order: imagine finger tapping (kMI); experience vibratory sensations in the middle finger (TS); and mentally reproduce the sensation of vibration (TI). MEPs increased during both kMI and TI, with a stronger increase for kMI. No statistically significant change in MEP was observed during TS. The demonstrated differential effects of kMI, TI and TS on corticospinal excitability have practical implications for the development of imagery-based and TS-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), particularly the ones intended to improve neurorehabilitation by evoking plastic changes in sensorimotor circuitry. Significance StatementWhile it is known that tactile imagery (TI) engages the primary somatosensory cortex similarly to physical tactile perceptions, it is not well understood how TI affects neural processing in the primary motor cortex (M1), the area that controls voluntary movements while receiving somatosensory feedback. This study employed transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to examine the responsiveness of M1 to different types of somatosensory imagery in response to TMS. TI facilitated the responses in the forearm and hand muscles but to a significantly lesser extent compared to kinesthetic motor imagery (kMI). This demonstration of the distinct effects of TI and kMI on corticospinal excitability highlights the importance of selecting an imagery strategy when using imagery to modulate cortical representation of the body. These findings have practical implications for the development of imagery-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) intended for rehabilitation of sensorimotor impairments.

neuroscience↗

Tactile Imagery Affects Cortical Responses to Vibrotactile Stimulation of the Fingertip

Although imagery of tactile sensations is not so well studied compared to other types of mental imagery, it is potentially very useful for brain computer interfaces (BCIs) where it could produce neural modulations needed for BCI operations. Here we assessed neural modulations associated with tactile imagery (TI) by comparing its effects on cortical responses to the effects of actual vibrotactile stimulation of the fingertip. We found that both TI and vibrostimulation evoked event-related frequency changes of the electroencephalographic (EEG) activity. Moreover, TI affected somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) evoked by short pulses of vibration. EEG data were collected in 29 participants trained to perform tactile imagery task. Responses to vibratory pulses were measured with and without TI. These SEPs consisted of three prominent components: a P100 response in the centro-parietal regions, a P200 response in the frontal region, and a P300 response in the central regions. The TI consistently resulted in an increase in ipsilateral P100, ipsi- and contralateral P300 and frontal P200. Moreover, TI strengthened the {theta}-band ERS in the frontal region that occurred in response to vibration. These findings suggest that TI not only modulates EEG patterns by itself but also affects cortical processing of physical somatosensory stimuli. Such conjoint processing of both real and imagined somatic sensations could be utilized in BCIs, particularly in clinically relevant BCI that strive to restore somatosensory processing by combining centrally-induced and peripheral activities. Significance StatementWhile it is known that tactile imagery (TI) engages the same cortical areas that are active during the processing of real tactile inputs, neural mechanisms of such shared representation are not well understood. This study employed EEG recordings to examine the interaction between real and imagined somatic sensations. It was found that TI both changes EEG oscillatory activity and facilitates cortical responses to real tactile stimuli. Therefore combining TI with tactile stimulation could be useful for tactile-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), particularly the ones of clinical utility for neurorehabilitation and sensory substitution.

neuroscience↗

Lateralized Sensorimotor Evoked Potentials during Visuomotor Transformation in Real and Imagined Movements

The neural mechanisms underlying motor preparation have attracted much attention, particularly because of the assertion that they are similar to the mechanisms of motor imagery (MI), a technique widely used in motor rehabilitation and brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). Here we clarified the process of visuomotor transformation for the real and imagined movements by analyzing EEG responses that were time locked to the appearance of visual targets and movement onsets. The experimental task required responding to target stimuli with button presses or imagined button presses while ignoring distractors. We examined how different components of movement-related potentials (MRPs) varied depending on the reaction time (RT) and interpreted the findings in terms of the motor noise accumulation hypothesis. Furthermore, we compared MRPs and event-related desynchronization (ERD) for overt motor actions versus motor imagery. For the MRPs, we distinguished lateralized readiness potentials (LRPs) and reafferent potentials (RAPs). While MRPs were similar for the real and imagined movements, imagery-related potentials were not lateralized. The amplitude of the late potentials that developed during motor imagery at the same time RAPs occurred during real movements was correlated with the amplitude of {beta}-ERD. As such they could have represented sensorimotor activation triggered by the imagery. LRPs that occurred during real movements lasted longer for longer RTs, which is consistent with activity accumulation in the motor cortex prior to overt action onset. LRPs occurred for non-target stimuli, as well, but they were small and short lived. We interpret these results in terms of a visuomotor transformation, where information flows from visual to motor areas and results in a movement, a decision not to move and/or a mental image of a movement. The amplitude of the late positive peak that developed during MI was correlated with the amplitude of the {beta}-ERD. Since the latency of this component was consistent with the timing of RAP, we suggest that it is a non-lateralized RAP-like component associated with sensorimotor activation during kinesthetic MI.

neuroscience↗

Event-Related Desynchronization induced by Tactile Imagery: an EEG Study

It is well known that both the movement of the hand itself and the mental representation of it lead to event-related desynchronization (ERD) of EEG recorded over the corresponding motor areas of the cerebral cortex. Similarly, in somatosensory cortical areas, ERD occurs upon tactile stimulation of the hand, but whether this effect is caused by mental representation of sensations from tactile stimulation remains poorly understood. In the present study, the effects on the EEG of imaginary vibrotactile sensations on the right hand were compared with the effects of real vibrotactile stimulation. Both actual vibrotactile stimulation and mental representation of it have been found to elicit contralateral ERD patterns, particularly prominent in the -band and most pronounced in the C3 region. The paper discusses tactile imagery as a part of the complex sensorimotor mental image and its prospects for using EEG patterns of imagery-induced tactile sensations as control signals in BCI circuits independently and when combined with ERD based on movement imagination to improve the efficiency of neurointerface technologies in rehabilitation medicine, in particular, to restore movements after a stroke and neurotrauma.

neuroscience↗