Wuerbel, H. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2022

Evidence for HARKing in mouse behavioural tests of anxiety

Anxiety disorders are among the most common mental health conditions needing new and better treatments. Research and development of anxiolytic drugs using animal models heavily rely on behavioural tests, most of which measure anxiolytic effects by increased exploratory activity in potentially threatening environments. However, interpretation of such tests is ambiguous because reduced exploratory activity can reflect either anxiety or sedation by the compound. Based on a systematic review of the sensitivity of mouse behavioural tests of anxiety to anxiolytic drugs, we analysed outcomes of 206 studies testing the effect of diazepam in either the open-field test or the hole-board test, as outcomes of these tests showed substantial variation in both direction and strength of the drug effect. Surprisingly, we found that both the rationale given for using the test, whether to detect anxiolytic or sedative effects, and the predicted effect of diazepam, anxiolytic or sedative, strongly depended on the reported test results. The most likely explanation for such strong dependency is post-hoc reasoning, also called hypothesizing after the results are known (HARKing). HARKing can invalidate study outcomes and hampers evidence synthesis by inflating effect sizes. It may also lead researchers into blind alleys, put patients in clinical trials at risk, and waste animals, time, and resources for inconclusive research.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2022

Rearing environment persistently modulates the phenotype of mice

The phenotype of an organism results from its genotype and the influence of the environment throughout development. Even when using animals of the same genotype, independent studies may test animals of different phenotypes, resulting in poor replicability due to genotype-by-environment interactions 1-4. Thus, genetically defined strains of mice may respond differently to experimental treatments depending on their rearing environment 5. However, the extent of such phenotypic plasticity and its implications for the replicability of research findings have remained unknown. Here, we examined the extent to which common environmental differences between rearing facilities modulate the phenotype of genetically homogeneous (inbred) mice. We conducted a comprehensive multi-center study, where inbred mice from the same breeding stock were reared in five different facilities throughout early life and adolescence, before being transported to a single test laboratory. We found persistent effects of rearing facility on the composition and heterogeneity of the gut microbial community. These effects were paralleled by persistent differences in body weight and in the behavioural phenotype of the mice. Furthermore, we show that common variation among rearing facilities is strong enough to influence epigenetic patterns in neurons at the level of chromatin organization. We detected changes in chromatin organization in the regulatory regions of genes involved in nucleosome assembly, neuronal differentiation, synaptic plasticity and regulation of behavior. Our findings demonstrate that common environmental differences between rearing facilities may produce facility-specific phenotypes, from the molecular to the behavioural level. We expect our findings to stimulate further research into the mechanisms and drivers of these epigenetic changes mediated by the laboratory environment. Furthermore, they highlight an important limitation of inferences from single-laboratory studies and a need to account for the animals environmental background in study design to produce robust and replicable findings.

neuroscience↗