The role of ducks in detecting Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in small-scale backyard poultry farms
Previous research efforts on highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza (HPAI) suggest that different avian species exhibit a varied severity of clinical signs after infection. Waterfowl, such as ducks or geese, can be asymptomatic and act as silent carriers of H5N1, making detection harder and increasing the risk of further transmission, potentially leading to significant economic losses. For backyard hobby farmers, passive reporting is a common HPAI detection strategy. We aim to quantify the effectiveness of this strategy by simulating the spread of H5N1 in a mixed-species, small-population backyard flock. Quantities such as detection time and undetected burden of infection in various scenarios are compared. Our results indicate that the presence of ducks can lead to a higher risk of an outbreak and a higher burden of infection. If most ducks within a flock are resistant to H5N1, detection can be significantly delayed. We find that within-flock infection dynamics can heavily depend on the species composition in backyard farms. Ducks, in particular, can pose a higher risk of transmission within a flock or between flocks. Our findings can help inform surveillance and intervention strategies at the flock and local levels. Author summaryWe addressed the gap in our understanding of within-flock transmission dynamics of H5N1, particularly for small-scale, backyard farms, where it is reasonably realistic for multiple species of birds to be housed together. These smaller flocks may differ from their larger, industrialised counterparts in their structure and management, and may play a key role in the persistence and spread of H5N1. Notably, we know from the literature that waterfowl, such as ducks, can be asymptomatic after contracting H5N1 and thus act as silent carriers of the virus, which could amplify the risk posed to other species of birds, mammals, and humans. We used a stochastic mechanistic model that accounted for such possibilities and simulated the possible outcomes of an outbreak. We found that while the presence of chickens is more likely to lead to high mortality upon infection, ducks can make H5N1 harder to detect within a flock, and thus cause a greater burden of infection, which increases the risk of potential between-flock and between-site transmissions. Our findings are consistent with the current literature and can help inform surveillance and control strategies.