Wright, D. S. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2023

Oviposition behaviour is not affected by ultraviolet light in a butterfly with sexually-dimorphic expression of a UV-sensitive opsin

Animal vision is important for mediating multiple complex behaviours. In Heliconius butterflies, vision guides fundamental behaviours such as oviposition, foraging and mate choice. Colour vision in Heliconius involves ultraviolet (UV), blue and long-wavelength sensitive photoreceptors (opsins). Additionally, Heliconius possess a duplicated UV opsin, and its expression varies widely within the genus. In Heliconius erato, opsin expression is sexually dimorphic; only females express both UV-sensitive opsins, enabling UV wavelength discrimination. However, the ecological pressures that have driven these sex-specific differences in visual perception remain unresolved. Heliconius females invest heavily in finding hostplants to lay their eggs, a behaviour heavily reliant on visual cues. We tested whether UV vision is used for oviposition in H. erato and Heliconius himera females by manipulating the availability of UV in behavioural experiments under naturalistic conditions. We found that UV did not influence the number of oviposition attempts or the number of eggs laid. In addition, their hostplant, Passiflora punctata, does not reflect UV wavelengths, and models of H. erato female vision suggest only minimal stimulation of the UV opsins. Overall, these findings suggest that UV wavelengths do not directly affect the ability of Heliconius females to find suitable oviposition sites. Alternatively, UV discrimination could be used in the context of foraging or mate choice, but this remains to be tested.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2022

The clock gene Per1 expression may exert diurnal control over hippocampal memory consolidation

The circadian system influences many different biological processes, including memory performance. While the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) functions as the brains central pacemaker, satellite clocks have also been identified in other brain regions, such as the memory-relevant dorsal hippocampus. Although it is unclear how these satellite clocks contribute to brain function, one possibility is that they may serve to exert diurnal control over local processes. Within the hippocampus, for example, the local clock may contribute to time-of-day effects on memory. Here, we used the hippocampus-dependent Object Location Memory task to determine how memory is regulated across the day/night cycle in mice. First, we systematically determined which phase of memory (acquisition, consolidation, or retrieval) is modulated across the 24h day. We found that mice show better long-term memory performance during the day than at night, an effect that was specifically attributed to diurnal changes in memory consolidation, as neither memory acquisition nor memory retrieval fluctuated across the day/night cycle. Using RNA-sequencing we identified the circadian clock gene Period1 (Per1) as a key mechanism capable of supporting this diurnal fluctuation in memory consolidation, as Per1 oscillates in tandem with memory performance. We then show that local knockdown of Per1 within the dorsal hippocampus has no effect on either the circadian rhythm or sleep behavior, although previous work has shown this manipulation impairs memory. Thus, Per1 may independently function within the dorsal hippocampus to regulate memory in addition to its known role in regulating the circadian rhythm within the SCN. Per1 may therefore exert local diurnal control over memory consolidation within the dorsal hippocampus.

neuroscience↗